Over the last five years, a
lot has changed for Pfizer Inc, one of the world’s leading pharmaceutical companies based on pharma sales revenue. From entering into an agreement with German biotechnology company BioNTech SE in August 2018 for joint research
and development of mRNA-based influenza vaccines to merging its off-patent
branded and generic drug business, known as Upjohn, with Mylan to form Viatris and launching
Covid-19 vaccine Comirnaty and antiviral drug Paxlovid during the pandemic,
the New York-headquartered pharma giant has witnessed substantial
transformation in the recent past.The launch of Covid products was
undoubtedly the biggest event for the 174-year-old drugmaker, propelling it to the number 1 slot in 2021 with a turnover of US$ 81.3 billion, surpassing competitors such as AbbVie, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, and several others. In 2022, Pfizer further consolidated its position, with revenues exceeding US$ 100 billion, largely due to the success of its Covid products. This success of Covid products filled Pfizer’s coffers, allowing it to expand through the acquisition of smaller companies. Pfizer’s new brand identity and logo,
unveiled in 2021, signaled the company's shift from "commerce to science".Pfizer commercially operates through two segments — Biopharma, or its innovative science-based biopharmaceutical business that posted revenues worth US$ 98.98 billion in 2022, and Pfizer CentreOne (PC1),
a global contract development and manufacturing organization as well as a
leading supplier of specialty active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with US$ 1.3 billion in 2022 revenues.Pfizer’s core therapeutic areas are inflammation and immunology, internal medicine, oncology, rare diseases, vaccines and anti-infectives.View our Dashboard to know more about Pfizer's Drugs in Development (Free Excel)Pfizer in acquisition overdrive: Buys Seagen for US$ 43 bn, Biohaven for
US$ 11.6 bnPfizer has been utilizing its
war chest generated during the pandemic in acquiring companies that would help
grow the business when Covid is behind us and its other best-selling drugs
(such as Ibrance, Vyndaqel/Vyndamax, Xeljanz and Xtandi) face expiration of patents. In November 2021, Pfizer snapped
up Trillium Therapeutics for US$ 2.22 billion. Trillium is a
clinical stage immuno-oncology company developing innovative therapies for the
treatment of cancer. In March 2022, Pfizer acquired
Arena Pharmaceuticals for US$ 6.7 billion, a company that
develops novel therapies to treat immune-inflammatory ailments. Then, in Oct 2022 it completed the US$ 11.6 billion buyout of migraine specialist Biohaven. This brought Biohaven’s leading oral migraine drug in the US – Nurtec ODT (rimegepant) – into Pfizer’s fold. In June 2022, Pfizer completed the acquisition of ReViral Limited, gaining access to
its experimental drugs used to combat respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)
infections. In October, Pfizer paid US$ 5.4 billion for blood disorder
drugmaker Global Blood Therapeutics (GBT). Through this buyout, Pfizer has added GBT’s approved drug, Oxbryta, along with two other sickle cell medicines – GBT601 and inclacumab (both in mid- to late-stage testing) – to its portfolio.And this month, Pfizer
announced it will acquire Seattle-based cancer specialist Seagen for US$ 43 billion, its biggest acquisition in the recent past. “We are not buying the golden eggs,” Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer, said post the announcement. “We are acquiring the goose that is laying the golden eggs.”The Pfizer-Seagen deal is
also the largest biopharma acquisition since 2019, when BMS bought Celgene for US$ 74 billion. Seagen is a leader
in antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) technology. This deal will bring four
commercial medicines (Adcetris, Padcev, Tukysa and Tivdak) and a deep pipeline of ADC candidates to Pfizer’s fold.Seagen is likely to post US$
2.2 billion in revenues this year, which is expected to grow to over
US$ 10 billion (risk-adjusted) by 2030. Earlier this year, Bourla had said the company has planned to use its “extraordinary firepower” to buy products that will deliver US$ 25 billion in
incremental revenue by 2030. While Seagen will
bring in US$ 10 billion, another US$ 10.5 billion will come from Arena,
Biohaven, GBT and ReViral.View our Dashboard to know more about Pfizer's Drugs in Development (Free Excel) Diminishing demand for Covid products, expiring patents to drag turnover
downPfizer’s turnover has nearly doubled since 2018, when it was at US$ 53.6 billion. In July 2019,
Pfizer had announced the plan to combine
Upjohn with Mylan to form a new company — Viatris. With the separation of the Upjohn business and the formation of a consumer healthcare joint venture with GSK in 2019, Pfizer
transformed into a more focused player in innovative medicines and vaccines.
However, this restructuring measure also
led to a drop in its turnover to US$ 51.8 billion in 2019 and to US$ 41.9 billion in 2020. From the number three slot in 2018 (behind J&J and Roche), Pfizer’s ranking fell to eight in 2020.
However, Covid turned its fortunes yet again and its turnover increased to US$
81.3 billion in 2021.When we split Pfizer’s 2022 revenues of US$ 100.3 billion, we notice that its
portfolio has 10 products with sales greater
than US$ 1 billion. These include the Covid-19 vaccine Comirnaty with US$ 37.8
billion in revenues, Paxlovid with US$ 18.9 billion, anticoagulant Eliquis with US$ 6.5
billion, and the Prevnar family of pneumococcal vaccines with US$ 6.3 billion
in revenues. Pfizer's partner BMS recorded sales of US$ 11.8 billion for Eliquis in 2022.With a drop in Covid cases,
demand for Comirnaty and Paxlovid has decreased significantly. In 2023,
Comirnaty’s revenue is likely to drop 64 percent to around US$ 13.5 billion, and Paxlovid’s revenue is likely to plummet by around 58 percent to around US$ 8 billion.Pfizer expects its 2023
revenues to be between US$ 67 billion and US$ 71 billion, reflecting an
operational decline of over 30 percent. However, when we exclude the revenues
of Covid products, we are likely to see a growth in revenues of around 7 to 9 percent, coming primarily from new product launches, recently acquired products and Pfizer’s in-line portfolio.“Pfizer expects 2024 sales of Covid products to stabilize, then starting in 2025 and continuing in
2026 and beyond, it expects to see an increase in Covid-19 vaccination rates, assuming the successful development and approval of a Covid-flu combination product,” said Bourla. Last December, Pfizer and BioNTech received fast track designation from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for their mRNA-based combination vaccine candidate for influenza and Covid-19, which aims to help prevent two respiratory diseases with a single injection.View our Dashboard to know more about Pfizer's Drugs in Development (Free Excel) Stars in Pfizer’s pipeline — RSV, pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccinesIn 2022, Pfizer spent US$ 11.4 billion in research and development, up 12 percent from its R&D spend in 2021. It has a power-packed pipeline with 110 programs, including 72 new molecular entities. Out of the 110 programs, 33 are in oncology, 23 in inflammation and immunology, 19 in vaccines, 15 in internal medicines, 12 in rare diseases and eight in anti-infectives.However, the stars in Pfizer’s pipeline are its vaccine candidates. Pfizer’s RSV vaccine candidate RSVpreF is being developed for pregnant women (to help protect their babies from RSV after birth) and individuals 60 years of age or older for the prevention of lower respiratory tract disease caused by RSV. The vaccine recently received support from the FDA's advisory committee, and a decision on its use for older adults is expected by May 2023.The agency has also granted
priority review to the maternal RSV vaccine, with an action date of August
2023. If approved, it would be the first vaccine for pregnant women
to help protect against the complications of RSV disease in infants from birth
through six months.Recently, FDA also designated
Prevnar 20 for priority review in children aged six weeks through 17 years. Six months ago, Merck’s Vaxneuvance had received pediatric approval. The Merck vaccine defends against 15 serotypes, as compared to 13 strains covered by Pfizer’s Prevnar. However, Merck’s edge could be short-lived as Prevnar’s next-generation vaccine protects against 20 serotypes. The US regulatory agency has also accepted the BLA (biologics license application) review of Pfizer’s pentavalent meningococcal vaccine candidate — MenABCWY — in adolescents with the PDUFA date of October 2023. Moreover, the
company has announced positive top-line results from a phase 3 study of
its hemophilia B gene therapy candidate, fidanacogene elaparvovec.Besides this vaccines and
therapies, FDA is going to decide on several other Pfizer drugs in 2023, such
as ritlecitinib for alopecia,
elranatamab for multiple myeloma, etrasimod for ulcerative
colitis, and Abrilada, a biosimilar of AbbVie’s blockbuster Humira (adalimumab).View our Dashboard to know more about Pfizer's Drugs in Development (Free Excel) Our viewAs of today, the sweet spot of US$ 100.3 billion in 2022 revenues posted by Pfizer surely looks like a one-off. Though the drug behemoth’s vaccine pipeline looks promising, its shopping list reflects a huge reliance on oncology for future growth.While only time can tell which of those bets will work and which won’t, it looks like Pfizer has capitalized on the lead the pandemic granted it to race ahead of competition.(All financial and drug pipeline-related information has been taken from the Pfizer website.)
Impressions: 2708
In 2022, the world finally began to emerge out of Covid-related
restrictions. Though 2020 and 2021 saw several travel-related curbs, there was
no let up in the speed at which generic active pharmaceutical ingredient (API)
manufacturers were submitting Drug Master Files (DMFs) to the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA). In the four years between 2018 and 2021, the number of
Type II DMF submissions (i.e. submissions for drug substance, drug substance
intermediate, and material used in their preparation, or drug product) remained
steady at over 630 per year.In 2022, the DMF submissions rose at an impressive pace of 12.1
percent. A total of 1,024 DMFs (Types II, III, IV and V) were submitted in
2022, as opposed to 913 in 2021.Last year, Type II DMF submissions increased by 7.2 percent — a total of 715 Type II DMFs were submitted in 2022 as opposed to 667 in 2021. However, of the 715 DMFs filed with the FDA, only 190 (26 percent) had their reviews completed.View FDA DMF Filings in 2022 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available) DMF submissions from India dip 10.6%, China’s filings increase 45%As always, DMFs filed from India and China were significantly higher than DMFs from other countries. However, the year saw DMF submissions from India drop by 10.6 percent. Overall DMF submission from India stood at 336, as opposed to 376 in 2021. In comparison, China’s DMF filings increased by 45 percent to 231 in 2022, as opposed to 159 in 2021. Interestingly, FDA had issued 31 Form 483s in 2022 out of which 15 were issued to Indian drugmakers. Out of 15, seven Form 483s were issued to manufacturing units belonging to four Indian API manufacturers — Lupin, Aurobindo Pharma, Torrent and Biocon Biologics.While DMFs are submissions to FDA that may be used to provide
confidential, detailed information about facilities, processes, or articles
used in the manufacturing, processing, packaging, and storing of human drug
products, a Form 483 is a notification sent by the FDA to a
drugmaker regarding objectionable conditions at a facility. A Form 483 is
issued at the conclusion of an inspection, when an investigator finds
regulatory violations and/or non-compliance of good manufacturing practices. January 2023 saw a spate of Form
483s issued to Indian drugmakers, raising concerns within the pharma
industry.View FDA DMF Filings in 2022 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available) India’s Metrochem API tops DMF submissionsIndia’s Metrochem API led the list of companies with the highest number of DMF submissions at 19. MSN Labs stood second with 16 submissions.Other top Indian companies were Aurobindo Pharma (15), Biophore India (15), Hetero Group (11) and Cipla (10), followed by two Chinese companies — BrightGene Bio-Medical Technology and Changzhou Pharmaceutical Factory — with 9 submissions each.The maximum number of DMF filings were for elagolix sodium (11), empagliflozin (eight), tofacitinib citrate (six), revefenacin (six), apixaban (five), brivaracetam (five), cannabidiol (five), followed by mirabegron (five) and tafamidis (five).A total of 79 DMFs were filed for the
first time for 64 products, of which 28 had their GDUFA (Generic Drug User Fee Amendments) review
completed. These
include revefenacin (six), migalastat hydrochloride (three), cupric sulfate (three), ivosidenib (two), upadacitinib (one) and voxelotor (one). Revefenacin is losing
its marketing exclusivity this year.View FDA DMF Filings in 2022 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available) Our viewIn our last (H1 2022) review of DMF submissions, we had mentioned that less than half of the 350 Type II DMFs filed by the FDA had been reviewed, as the user fee program had not been reauthorized.FDA published the New GDUFA III fee structure at the eleventh hour — on September 30, 2022. GDUFA III includes several enhancements to the abbreviated new drug
application (ANDA) assessment process to maximize the efficiency and utility of
each assessment cycle. These enhancements aim to reduce the number of
assessment cycles and facilitate timely access to safe, effective, high-quality
and affordable generics.With the GDUFA III, the US government has made clear its intent to
lower generic drug prices. In future, more drugs are likely to go off-patent and we are likely to see the number of
DMF submissions rise even further.In
the second quarter of 2022, FDA resumed unannounced inspections in India. The regulator has also stepped up onsite inspections. FDA wants cheaper drugs, but not at the cost of quality. There are no short-cuts for generic and bulk drug manufacturers wanting to export to the US.(This article has been updated to accurately reflect the information on Metrochem API and MSN Labs.)
Impressions: 2214
Nearly every
year, drugmakers ring in the new year with drug price increases in the US. This
year too, prices of over 450 prescription
medicines increased by an average of around 5 percent at the start of January.
This, when high drug prices have been one of the biggest political issues in
the US over the last few years.
PharmaCompass decided to usher in 2022 with a review of the US Medicare Part D Prescription Drug data recently released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for calendar year 2019. Using the available data, we have developed our own dashboard to show recent trends in consumption of prescription drugs. With this analysis, we hope our readers will get a better understanding of the world’s largest market for pharmaceuticals, as also a fix on where it may be headed.
View US Medicare Part D 2019 Drug Spending (Free Excel Available)
Rising healthcare, drug spends in US
Over the
last several years, we have repeatedly heard political leaders in the US
complain about high drug prices. Yet, drug prices and healthcare spends have
risen unabated.
America’s National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA) includes annual expenditures on healthcare goods and services, public health activities, the net cost of health insurance, and investment related to healthcare. In 2019, America’s national health expenditure (NHE) grew by 4.6 percent to US$ 3.8
trillion, accounting for 17.7 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP).
During the year, prescription drug spend increased by 5.7
percent to US$ 369.7 billion. In comparison, Medicare spend grew 6.7
percent to US$ 799.4 billion.
President
Joe Biden recently stressed on the need to cap the prices of essential drugs,
and said that the average American pays the highest prices for prescription
drugs anywhere in the world. Americans pay 10 times as much as other countries for life-saving insulin — the top selling prescription drug covered by the Part D program.
Pharma
companies, on the other hand, have vehemently argued against any price cuts in
the US, saying price cuts would hinder drug research and development for all
diseases.
View US Medicare Part D 2019 Drug Spending (Free Excel Available)
Patented drugs account for 80.3 percent of total Part D spend
Medicare is the US federal government’s program that
provides health insurance to most people who are 65 years
or older. Medicare’s Part D plan provides outpatient drug coverage through private
insurance companies that have contracts with the federal government. Eligible
people have to choose and enroll in a private prescription drug plan for Part D
coverage. Medicare Part B, on the other hand, covers a wide variety of
medically necessary outpatient services and some preventative services.
Prescription
drug coverage under Part D reached US$ 183 billion in 2019 — a growth of around 9 percent over 2018, when spending was US$ 168 billion. Spending
on patented drugs in 2019 accounted for around US$ 147 billion or 80.3 percent
of the total spend for the year. Generic drugs made up for the remaining 19.7
percent (approximately US$ 36 billion). In 2018, generic drugs worth US$ 35.8
billion were sold under Part D, accounting for 21 percent of the total spend
under the program.
View US Medicare Part D 2019 Drug Spending (Free Excel Available)
Eliquis ranks highest on Medicare’s brand drug spend
Under Part
D, endocrinology and oncology were the two therapeutic areas that generated
maximum revenue for pharma companies, driving home sales of over US$ 31.8
billion and US$ 23.5 billion, respectively. Neurology drugs generated sales of
around US$ 22.9 billion.
Among branded
drugs, Bristol Myers Squibb’s anticoagulant Eliquis (apixaban) was the most selling drug in 2019 under Part D, notching up about US$ 7.3 billion in sales — a rise of US$ 2.3 billion or 46 percent over 2018.
Celgene’s cancer drug Revlimid (lenalidomide) roped in US$ 4.7 billion (up
by 14.6 percent), while another anticoagulant drug Xarelto (rivaroxaban) by Janssen Pharma — a unit of Johnson & Johnson — fetched US$ 4.1 billion (up 20.6 percent) in sales through Part D. AbbVie’s anti-rheumatic drug Humira and Sanofi’s diabetes drug Lantus saw sales of around US$ 3.7 billion each
under the program.
Amongst
generics, the largest selling drug under Part D (by dosage units) was metformin (diabetes), followed by gabapentin (seizure), PEG3350 with
electrolyte (gastroenterology), metoprolol (hypertension) and atorvastatin (cholesterol). In 2019, the
overall dosage units sold also jumped higher by 2.25 billion units to 111.35
billion.
The sales
ranking of Part D does bare some similarities with the global ranking of
highest selling drugs. In 2020, Humira had retained its position as the highest
selling drug in the world, generating sales of US$ 20.4 billion. Both
Eliquis and Revlimid had retained their ranking as the third and fourth most
selling drugs, bringing home US$ 14.1 billion and US$ 12.1 billion in global
sales in 2020.
View US Medicare Part D 2019 Drug Spending (Free Excel Available)
Medicare’s inability to negotiate prices costs American taxpayers billions of dollars
Over the
years, drug companies have used Medicare’s
inability to negotiate prices under Part D to increase the prices of their
drugs significantly and rip off huge profits, a three-year-long US House
Oversight Committee investigation has revealed.
US taxpayers could have saved over US$ 25 billion in five years if the prices of just seven drugs — Humira, Imbruvica, Sensipar, Enbrel, Lantus, NovoLog and Lyrica — were negotiated by Medicare. Another US$ 16.7 billion could have been saved between
2011 and 2017 on insulin products manufactured by Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi, which control 90 percent of the insulin market in the US, the committee’s report revealed.
Elsewhere in
the world, the same drugmakers are bending over backwards to get into medical
insurance programs. For instance, China reported that several international
pharma firms, many of them headquartered in the US, slashed the prices of their
drugs by up to 94 percent to get into the country’s national medical insurance coverage.
In the US — which accounted for around 46 percent of the global share of drugs in 2020 — senior citizens may have to pay more for medicines as the government announced a large hike in Medicare premiums for 2022
if an expensive Alzheimer’s drug, Aduhelm, is included in the list.
In order to
ensure inclusion in Medicare, Biogen slashed the price of Aduhelm by half — from US$ 56,000 to US$ 28,200 — just weeks before a crucial meeting called by the CMS. Clearly, this has set a precedent in an industry which is known for rampant price hikes and rarely for any price cuts. This could also be put forth as an example of what Medicare could achieve if it receives negotiation rights.
View US Medicare Part D 2019 Drug Spending (Free Excel Available)
Our view
President
Biden's Build Back Better legislation,
which the House passed last month, is up for vote in the Senate. The
legislation contains provisions that would allow Medicare to negotiate the
prices of some expensive drugs, penalize drugmakers who raise prices faster
than inflation and cap out-of-pocket costs for insulin at US$ 35 per month.
However, chances of the bill being passed in its present form are slim.
Even if the
Senate passes the bill, Medicare would be able to negotiate the prices of only 10 prescription drugs and insulin products in 2025.
The number would increase over the years, reaching 100 in six years, and hence
forth grow by 20 drugs a year.
It seems like 2022 won’t be the last year when January 1 will be braced with price hikes in the US by drugmakers. Looks like they will continue to make hay while the sun shines.
View US Medicare Part D 2019 Drug Spending (Free Excel Available)
Impressions: 2622
Acquisitions and spin-offs dominated headlines in 2019 and the tone was set very early with Bristol-Myers Squibb acquiring
New Jersey-based cancer drug company Celgene in a US$ 74 billion deal announced on
January 3, 2019. After factoring
in debt, the deal value ballooned to about US$ 95 billion, which according
to data compiled by Refinitiv, made it the largest healthcare deal on
record.
In the summer, AbbVie Inc,
which sells the world’s best-selling drug Humira, announced its acquisition of Allergan Plc, known for Botox and other cosmetic
treatments, for US$ 63 billion. While the companies are still awaiting
regulatory approval for their deal, with US$ 49 billion in combined 2019
revenues, the merged entity would rank amongst the biggest in the industry.
View Our Interactive Dashboard on Top drugs by sales in 2019 (Free Excel Available)
The big five by pharmaceutical sales — Pfizer,
Roche, J&J, Novartis and Merck
Pfizer
continued
to lead companies by pharmaceutical sales by reporting annual 2019 revenues of
US$ 51.8 billion, a decrease of US$ 1.9 billion, or 4 percent, compared to
2018. The decline was primarily attributed to the loss of exclusivity of Lyrica in 2019,
which witnessed its sales drop from US$ 5 billion in 2018 to US$ 3.3 billion in
2019.
In 2018, Pfizer’s then incoming CEO Albert Bourla had mentioned that the company did not see the need for any large-scale M&A activity as Pfizer had “the best pipeline” in its history, which needed the company to focus on deploying its capital to keep its pipeline flowing and execute on its drug launches.
Bourla stayed true to his word and barring the acquisition of Array Biopharma for US$ 11.4 billion and a spin-off to merge Upjohn, Pfizer’s off-patent branded and generic established medicines business with
Mylan, there weren’t any other big ticket deals which were announced.
The
Upjohn-Mylan merged entity will be called Viatris and is expected to have 2020
revenues between US$ 19 and US$ 20 billion
and could outpace Teva to
become the largest generic company in the world, in term of revenues.
Novartis, which had
followed Pfizer with the second largest revenues in the pharmaceutical industry
in 2018, reported its first full year earnings after spinning off its Alcon eye
care devices business division that
had US$ 7.15 billion in 2018 sales.
In 2019,
Novartis slipped two spots in the ranking after reporting total sales of US$
47.4 billion and its CEO Vas Narasimhan continued his deal-making spree by buying New
Jersey-headquartered The Medicines Company (MedCo) for US$ 9.7
billion to acquire a late-stage cholesterol-lowering
therapy named inclisiran.
As Takeda Pharmaceutical Co was
busy in 2019 on working to reduce its debt burden incurred due to its US$ 62
billion purchase of Shire Plc, which was announced in 2018, Novartis also purchased
the eye-disease medicine, Xiidra, from the Japanese drugmaker for US$ 5.3 billion.
Novartis’ management also spent a considerable part of 2019 dealing with data-integrity concerns which emerged from its 2018 buyout of AveXis, the
gene-therapy maker Novartis had acquired for US$ 8.7 billion.
The deal gave Novartis rights to Zolgensma,
a novel treatment intended for children less than two years of age with the
most severe form of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Priced at US$ 2.1 million,
Zolgensma is currently the world’s most expensive drug.
However,
in a shocking announcement, a month after approving the drug, the US Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) issued a press release on
data accuracy issues as the agency was informed by AveXis that
its personnel had manipulated data which
the FDA used to evaluate product comparability and nonclinical (animal)
pharmacology as part of the biologics license application (BLA), which was
submitted and reviewed by the FDA.
With US$
50.0 billion (CHF 48.5 billion) in annual pharmaceutical sales, Swiss drugmaker
Roche came in at number two position in 2019
as its sales grew 11 percent driven by
its multiple sclerosis medicine Ocrevus, haemophilia drug Hemlibra and cancer medicines Tecentriq and Perjeta.
Roche’s newly introduced medicines generated US$ 5.53 billion (CHF 5.4 billion) in growth, helping offset the impact of the competition from biosimilars for its three best-selling drugs MabThera/Rituxan, Herceptin and Avastin.
In late 2019, after months of increased
antitrust scrutiny, Roche completed
its US$ 5.1 billion acquisition of Spark Therapeutics to strengthen its presence in
gene therapy.
Last year, J&J reported almost flat worldwide sales of US$ 82.1 billion. J&J’s pharmaceutical division generated US$ 42.20 billion and its medical devices and consumer health divisions brought in US$ 25.96 billion and US$ 13.89 billion respectively.
Since J&J’s consumer health division sells analgesics, digestive health along with beauty and oral care products, the US$ 5.43 billion in consumer health sales from over-the-counter drugs and women’s health products was only used in our assessment of J&J’s total pharmaceutical revenues. With combined pharmaceutical sales of US$ 47.63 billion, J&J made it to number three on our list.
While the sales of products like Stelara, Darzalex, Imbruvica, Invega Sustenna drove J&J’s pharmaceutical business to grow by 4 percent over 2018, the firm had to contend with generic competition against key revenue contributors Remicade and Zytiga.
US-headquartered Merck, which is known as
MSD (short for Merck Sharp & Dohme) outside the United States and
Canada, is set to significantly move up the rankings next year fueled by its
cancer drug Keytruda, which witnessed a 55
percent increase in sales to US$ 11.1 billion.
Merck reported total revenues of US$ 41.75 billion and also
announced it will spin off its women’s health drugs,
biosimilar drugs and older products to create a new pharmaceutical
company with US$ 6.5 billion in annual revenues.
The firm had anticipated 2020 sales between US$ 48.8 billion and US$ 50.3 billion however this week it announced that the coronavirus pandemic will reduce 2020 sales by more than $2 billion.
View Our Interactive Dashboard on Top drugs by sales in 2019 (Free Excel Available)
Humira holds on to remain world’s best-selling drug
AbbVie’s acquisition of Allergan comes as the firm faces the expiration of patent protection for Humira, which brought in a staggering US$ 19.2 billion in sales last year for
the company. AbbVie has failed to successfully acquire or develop a major new
product to replace the sales generated by its flagship drug.
In 2019, Humira’s US revenues increased 8.6 percent to US$ 14.86 billion while internationally, due
to biosimilar competition, the sales dropped 31.1 percent to US$ 4.30 billion.
Bristol Myers Squibb’s Eliquis, which is also marketed by Pfizer, maintained its number two position
and posted total sales of US$ 12.1 billion, a 23 percent increase over 2018.
While Bristol Myers Squibb’s immunotherapy treatment Opdivo, sold in partnership with Ono in Japan, saw sales increase from US$ 7.57 billion to US$ 8.0 billion, the growth paled in comparison to the US$ 3.9
billion revenue increase of Opdivo’s key immunotherapy competitor Merck’s Keytruda.
Keytruda took the number three spot in drug sales that
previously belonged to Celgene’s Revlimid, which witnessed a sales decline from US$ 9.69 billion to US$ 9.4 billion.
Cancer treatment Imbruvica, which is marketed
by J&J and AbbVie, witnessed a 30 percent increase in sales. With US$ 8.1
billion in 2019 revenues, it took the number five position.
View Our Interactive Dashboard on Top drugs by sales in 2019 (Free Excel Available)
Vaccines – Covid-19 turns competitors into partners
This year has been dominated by the single biggest health emergency in years — the novel coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic. As drugs continue to fail to meet expectations, vaccine development has received a lot of attention.
GSK reported the highest vaccine sales of all drugmakers with
total sales of US$ 8.4 billion (GBP 7.16 billion), a significant portion of its
total sales of US$ 41.8 billion (GBP 33.754 billion).
US-based Merck’s vaccine division also reported a significant increase in sales to US$ 8.0 billion and in 2019 received FDA and EU approval to market its Ebola vaccine Ervebo.
This is the first FDA-authorized vaccine against the deadly virus which causes
hemorrhagic fever and spreads from person to person through direct contact with
body fluids.
Pfizer and Sanofi also reported an increase in their vaccine sales to US$ 6.4
billion and US$ 6.2 billion respectively and the Covid-19 pandemic has recently
pushed drugmakers to move faster than ever before and has also converted
competitors into partners.
In a rare move, drug behemoths — Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) —joined hands to develop a vaccine for the novel coronavirus.
The two companies plan to start human trials
in the second half of this year, and if things go right, they will file
for potential approvals by the second half of 2021.
View Our Interactive Dashboard on Top drugs by sales in 2019 (Free Excel Available)
Our view
Covid-19 has brought the world economy to a grinding halt and shifted the global attention to the pharmaceutical industry’s capability to deliver solutions to address this pandemic.
Our compilation shows that vaccines and drugs
for infectious diseases currently form a tiny fraction of the total sales of
pharmaceutical companies and few drugs against infectious diseases rank high on
the sales list.
This could well explain the limited range of
options currently available to fight Covid-19. With the pandemic currently infecting
over 3 million people spread across more than 200 countries, we can safely
conclude that the scenario in 2020 will change substantially. And so should our
compilation of top drugs for the year.
View Our Interactive Dashboard on Top drugs by sales in 2019 (Free Excel Available)
Impressions: 54752
This week, PharmaCompass reviews the recently released data of the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Program in the United States for calendar year 2017.
The US market is the world’s largest and most important pharmaceutical market, accounting around 45 percent of the global share of drugs, and was valued at US$ 466 billion in 2017.
View Our Interactive Dashboard on Medicare Part D 2017 Spending (Free Excel Available)
What is Medicare?
Medicare is the federal health insurance program in the US which covered 58.4 million people in 2017 — 49.5 million aged 65 and older, and 8.9 million disabled.
The National Health Expenditure (NHE) in the US grew 3.9 percent to US$ 3.5 trillion in 2017 and accounted for 17.9 percent of the gross domestic product
(GDP). As a result, Medicare spending grew 4.2 percent to US$ 705.9 billion in
2017, or 20 percent of the total NHE.
Prescription
drug spending in the US increased to US$ 333.4 billion in 2017 while prescription drug coverage under the Medicare program,
known as Medicare Part D, reached US$ 151.6 billion in 2017, a little less than half of the total prescription
drug spending in the United States.
View Our Interactive Dashboard on Medicare Part D 2017 Spending (Free Excel Available)
Why has Medicare been in news?
The Medicare Part D drug benefit is delivered by private drug plans, which are mostly chosen by the program’s participants. Under Part D, drug prices are determined primarily through negotiations between Part D plans and providers (such as pharmacies and drug manufacturers). A key factor that helps Part D plans lower drug costs are rebate payments that the plans negotiate with drug manufacturers.
With drug pricing debate raging in the
United States, these rebate payments have come under a lot of scrutiny.
View Our Interactive Dashboard on Medicare Part D 2017 Spending (Free Excel Available)
During the hearing of Big Pharma executives summoned by the Senate
Financing Committee last month, Sanofi’s CEO Olivier Brandicourt detailed a chart showing Sanofi and Genzyme's US sales from 2018, explaining how as much as 55 percent of Sanofi’s gross sales were given back to payers as rebates.
The chart showed how out of Sanofi’s US$ 21.6 billion in gross sales in 2018, US$ 4.5 billion was given back in mandatory rebates to government payers and US$ 7.3 billion in discretionary rebates.
Earlier this month, the Trump administration
unveiled a budget that would reduce spending in Medicare as
well as Medicaid by hundreds of billions of dollars compared to the current
law.
View Our Interactive Dashboard on Medicare Part D 2017 Spending (Free Excel Available)
What are the insights available from the
2017 US Medicare Part D data?
The Medicare Drug Spending dashboards were updated earlier this month to include data for 2017, providing more
data and transparency to better identify trends and track consumption and price
changes over time.
Using the available data, PharmaCompass has developed its own dashboard to show
recent trends in consumption of prescription drugs under Medicare D. Our
dashboard also helps identify drugs with limited to no competition.
The data reveals that while almost 60 percent of the Medicare spend (nearly US$ 90 billion) is for drugs with only one manufacturer, i.e. mostly patented drugs, there is another US$ 12 billion spend on drugs which have only two manufacturers. The next highest spend — of US$ 4 billion — is on drugs with as many as five manufacturers.
This clearly indicates that if the market
can support up to five manufacturers for established products, increased
generic competition will significantly help Medicare reduce its Part D
prescription drug spending.
View Our Interactive Dashboard on Medicare Part D 2017 Spending (Free Excel Available)
Medicare’s highest spend was on Insulin Glargine (US$ 4.7 billion) followed by patented
drugs Celgene’s Revlimid (lenalidomide), Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Eliquis (apixaban), Merck’s Januvia (sitagliptin phosphate) and AbbVie’s Humira (adalimumab).
Drugs with limited to no competition can be
identified using the dashboard by sorting for drugs with few
manufacturers.
Information is also provided on drug uses
and clinical indications, thereby enabling comparison between different
medications for a given condition.
View Our Interactive Dashboard on Medicare Part D 2017 Spending (Free Excel Available)
Impressions: 4699
The year 2017 was a landmark year for pharmaceutical
industries in the US and Europe, with a sharp increase in the number of new molecular entities (NMEs) being approved in both geographies.
The US Food
and Drug Administration (USFDA) approved 46 NMEs in 2017, the second highest
since 1996 when 53 NMEs were approved. In Europe, the European Medicines Agency
(EMA) approved 35 drugs with a new active substance, up from 27 in 2016.
Sales for most major pharmaceutical
companies continued to grow in 2017. Earnings forecasts for 2018 have been raised due to the recent US tax reform that has
generated investor hopes for accelerated dividend growth and share buyback
plans.
This week, PharmaCompass brings
you a compilation of the top drugs of 2017 by sales revenue.
Click here to Access All the 2017 Data (Excel
version available) for FREE!
Top-sellers: Humira races ahead, despite launch of biosimilars; Enbrel a distant second
There wasn’t any upheaval
at the top of the pharma drug sales charts. AbbVie’s anti-TNF (tumor necrosis factor) giant
Humira (adalimumab), which is approved to treat
psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis, added
almost another US $3 billion to its 2016 sales and posted nearly US $19 billion in revenues.
Last year, AbbVie’s raised expectations for Humira’s earnings to reach US $21 billion in global sales by 2020. The
company believes this drug will continue to be a significant cash contributor
until 2025 and the US $21 billion sales forecast
by 2020 is about US $3 billion higher than its expectation two years ago.
In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) approved Amgen’s Amjevita (adalimumab-atto) — a biosimilar of Humira. And in 2017, another Humira biosimilar — Boehringer Ingelheim’s Cyltezo
(adalimumab-adbm) — received approval from the FDA and European authorities.
Click here to Access All the 2017 Data (Excel
version available) for FREE!
Enbrel (etanercept),
the longest-used biologic medicine for the treatment of rheumatism around the
world, was the second best-selling drug with US $8.262 billion in 2017 sales.
The sales of the drug were down from US $9.366 billion in
2016 owing to lower selling prices and increased
competition, which in turn hurt demand.
Since it was first approved in the United States in 1998,
Enbrel has been approved in over 100 countries and the drug is promoted by Amgen,
Pfizer
and Takeda
in different geographies.
Novartis’ biosimilar copy of Enbrel, which got approved by the FDA in August
2016 for the treatment of patients with
rheumatoid arthritis (RA), plaque psoriasis, ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and
other diseases is still not on the market because of a patent-protection
challenge from Amgen.
Amgen is arguing in the US federal court
that its drug has patent protection until 2029.
Click here to Access All the 2017 Data (Excel
version available) for FREE!
Fast-growing drugs: Eylea and Revlimid bring
fortunes for Regeneron and Celgene
Regeneron’s
flagship eye treatment, Eylea (aflibercept) which is marketed by Bayer outside the United States, added another US $1 billion in
annual sales last year to record US $8.260 billion in total sales. Eylea net
sales grew 11 percent year-on-year in the US and 19 percent year-over-year
outside the US.
The company believes much of the recent
growth in the US was driven by demographic trends with an aging population as
well as an overall increase in the prevalence of diabetes.
These demographic trends are expected to
continue in the coming years, providing an opportunity for continued growth.
Eylea sales alone contribute 63 percent to Regeneron’s total sales.
Click here to Access All the 2017 Data (Excel
version available) for FREE!
Celgene’s
Revlimid
(lenalidomide)
— a thalidomide derivative introduced in 2004 as an immunomodulatory agent for the treatment of various cancers such as multiple myeloma — brought in an additional US $1.2 billion in 2017 sales and had total revenues of US $8.187 billion.
Revlimid continues to contribute more than 60 percent to the company’s total sales of US $13 billion.
Celgene received a setback this month as the
USFDA refused to consider Celgene’s
application for ozanimod, an experimental
treatment for relapsing multiple sclerosis. The treatment was being seen as a
key to the company’s fortunes as Celgene had
said ozanimod is worth US $4 billion to
US $6
billion a year in peak sales.
Click here to Access All the 2017 Data (Excel
version available) for FREE!
Gilead’s Hepatitis C franchise enters free fall
Gilead Sciences’ blockbuster hepatitis C drugs franchise that includes Sovaldi and Harvoni continue to feel the
competitive heat as they registered US $9.137
billion in 2017 sales, down from US $14.834
billion the previous year.
While reporting 2017 results, Gilead provided guidance for
2018 and said its sales of Hepatitis C drugs could fall
further to US $3.5 billion - US $4 billion. At their peak in 2015, Gilead’s Sovaldi and Harvoni had together generated
US $19.1 billion in sales.
One of the major reasons for this drop is AbbVie’s launch of its new treatment Mavyret
at a deep price discount to the competition. AbbVie
also claims to have the shortest treatment course at eight weeks, compared with
12 weeks or longer for other treatments.
AbbVie reported US $1.274 billion in Hepatitis C drug sales
in 2017, down from US $1.522 billion in 2016.
Click here to Access All the 2017 Data (Excel
version available) for FREE!
Novartis’ Gleevec, Merck’s cardiovascular drugs, GSK’s Advair face generic heat
Novartis’ Gleevec (imatinib), which had at one point become the best-selling drug for Novartis and had brought in US $3.323 billion for the company in 2016, started facing generic competition last year and the anti-cancer drug lost US $1.380 billion in sales to bring in ‘only’ US $1.943 billion last year.
The US patents of Merck’s cardiovascular drugs — Zetia (Ezetimibe)
and Vytorin (Ezetimibe
and Simvastatin) — expired in April 2017. In May 2010, Merck and Glenmark
Pharmaceuticals entered into an agreement that allowed Glenmark to launch
a generic version of Zetia in late 2016. The drugs
that had combined sales of US $3.701
billion in 2016 felt the generic heat in 2017 and the sales were US
$1.606 billion lower at US $2.095
billion.
Click here to Access All the 2017 Data (Excel
version available) for FREE!
GSK’s Advair, which was expected
to encounter generic competition in 2017, continued to breathe easy as the FDA
found deficiencies in the applications of Hikma, Mylan and Sandoz.
All three failed to get the FDA nod for their generic versions of Advair, a drug used in the management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that generated sales worth US $4.431 billion (£3.130 billion) in 2017.
Top 15 drugs by sales
Here is PharmaCompass’ compilation
of the best-selling drugs of 2017. This is based on information extracted from
annual reports and US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings of major
pharmaceutical companies.
If you would like your own copy of all the information we’ve collected, email us at support@pharmacompass.com and we’ll send you an Excel version.
Click here to access all the 2017 data (Excel
version available) for FREE!
S. No.
Company / Companies
Product Name
Active Ingredient
Main Therapeutic Indication
2017 Revenue in Millions (USD)
1
AbbVie Inc., Eisai
Humira®
Adalimumab
Immunology (Organ Transplant, Arthritis etc.)
18,946
2
Amgen, Pfizer Inc., Takeda
Enbrel®
Etanercept
Immunology (Organ Transplant, Arthritis etc.)
8,262
3
Regeneron, Bayer
Eylea
Aflibercept
Ophthalmology
8,260
4
Celgene
Revlimid
Lenalidomide
Oncology
8,187
5
Roche
MabThera®/Rituxan®
Rituximab
Oncology
7,831
6
Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Mitsubishi Tanabe
Remicade®
Infliximab
Autoimmune Disorders
7,784
7
Roche
Herceptin®
Trastuzumab
Oncology
7,435
8
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer Inc.
Eliquis®
Apixaban
Cardiovascular Diseases
7,395
9
Roche
Avastin®
Bevacizumab
Oncology
7,089
10
Bayer, Johnson & Johnson
XareltoTM
Rivaroxaban
Cardiovascular Diseases
6,590
11
Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical
Opdivo
Nivolumab
Oncology
5,815
12
Sanofi
Lantus
Insulin Glargine
Diabetes
5,731
13
Pfizer Inc.
Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13
Pneumococcal 7-Valent Conjugate
Anti-bacterial
5,601
14
Pfizer Inc., Eisai
Lyrica
Pregabalin
Neurological/Mental Disorders
5,318
15
Amgen, Kyowa Hakko Kirin
Neulasta®
Pegfilgrastim
Blood Disorders
4,553
Sign up, stay ahead
In order to stay informed, and receive
industry updates along with our data compilations, do sign up for the PharmaCompass Newsletter and
you will receive updated information as it becomes available along with a lot
more industry analysis.
Click here to Access All
the 2017 Data (Excel version available) for FREE!
Impressions: 58408
This week, Phispers brings you the FY18 user fee schedule under GDUFA II, posted by the USFDA, with significantly higher fee for several applications. There is news on an old drug getting approved for treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson’s disease, and a new study revealed benefits of blood thinners — Xarelto and Brilinta. Meanwhile, Gilead acquired Kite Pharma to access a new kind
of cancer therapy. Read on.
USFDA announces generic user fees for FY18;
ANDAs, APIs, devices to pay higher fee
This week, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) posted
the FY18 user fee schedule for the
Generic Drug User Fee Amendments. Under the new Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2017 (GDUFA II) applications to market generic drugs, known as abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs), will see fee increases of more than US$ 100,000 — from US$ 70,480 in 2017 to US$ 171,823 in 2018.
The fees were set based on
negotiations between the pharmaceutical industry and the USFDA as part of
a new five-year reauthorization
of the FDA user fee programs signed
into law earlier this month.
In the fee schedule, a US$ 15,000
foreign differential applies to all non-US facilities, for both finished dosage
form (FDF) and active pharmaceutical ingredients (API).
This is the first year when pure CMO
(contract manufacturing organization) facilities will pay a ‘reduced’ facility fee — one-third of the fee for a non-CMO.
This year an ANDA holder fee,
also known as program fee, was introduced. This fee has three tiers: entities that hold
20+ approved ANDAs, entities that hold six-19 approved ANDAs, and entities that
hold one to five approved ANDAs. ANDAs
pending approval are not added to this count, just as facilities that are only
referenced in pending ANDAs are not subject to a facility fee.
GDUFA II fee for FY 2018
in US dollar
One-time application fee
ANDA
171,823
DMF
47,829
Recurring fee for facilities
Domestic API facility
45,367
Foreign API facility
60,367
Domestic FDF facility
211,087
Foreign FDF facility
226,087
Domestic CMO facility
70,362
Foreign CMO facility
85,362
Recurring GDUFA program fee
(20+ANDAs) Large size operation generic drug applicant program
1,590,792
(6-19 ANDAs) Medium size operation drug applicant program
636,317
(1-5 ANDAs) Small business generic drug applicant program
159,079
The fee is applicable from
October 1, 2017, until September 30, 2018.
Decades old drug — amantadine — wins FDA approval to treat dyskinesia in Parkinson’s
Adamas Pharmaceutical got the nod from the USFDA last week to sell its therapy ADS-5102 — an extended-release version of the generic amantadine. The agency approved it for treatment of a side effect (dyskinesia) caused by a commonly prescribed Parkinson’s drug — levodopa.
Amantadine was able to beat a placebo in significantly reducing the side effects of levodopa. This
generic drug is already used off label for dyskinesia.
This is the first drug cleared by
the FDA to control levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). According to Adamas,
around 200,000 people in the US suffer from LID.
LID leads to involuntary movements, mostly non-rhythmic, purposeless and unpredictable, making life all the more difficult for a patient of Parkinson’s disease. The disease is progressive and debilitating, causing tremors, rigidity, extreme slowness of movement, impaired balance, and difficulties in swallowing and speaking.
After GSK, Novartis picks its chief digital officer from retail; Pfizer’s swanky new HQ
Last month, GlaxoSmithKline appointed former Walmart chief information officer — Karenann Terrell — as its chief digital and technology officer. And last week, Swiss drug major Novartis followed suit — it appointed Bertrand Bodson, who is currently the chief digital and marketing officer for Sainsbury’s
Argos retail chain,
as its new chief digital officer. Bodson will assume office on January 1, 2018.
These two appointments point to
the growing challenges drug companies face from the digital world. For
instance, mobile applications offer patients new ways to monitor their health. And clinicians increasingly communicate with their patients using the digital media. Bodson’s appointment is also an indication that Novartis intends to use
technology for nearly everything — from drug discovery to interactions between clinicians and patients around the world. Bodson’s job also entails automating business processes.
Bodson holds a degree from the Harvard Business School. He has also co-founded the social network site — bragster.com.
Pfizer’s new HQ in New York: Pharma giant Pfizer has chosen the skyscraper — The Spiral — for its new headquarters in New York. The Spiral is a 1,005-foot-tall office tower in the Hudson Yards district of Manhattan’s Midtown West.
According to New York Post,
Pfizer has taken up nearly 800,000 square feet of space in this
building. The 65-story, 2.85-million square-foot building is designed by Danish
architect Bjarke Ingels.
FDA approves first CAR-T therapy for cancer; Gilead bets big on it by acquiring Kite
California-headquartered
biopharma company Gilead Sciences is acquiring Kite Pharma for US$
11.9 billion. The
acquisition points to Gilead’s increased focus on a new kind of cancer therapy, known as chimeric antegen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (or CAR-T)
According to Gilead, Kite is an industry leader in cell therapy — a treatment that uses the patient’s own immune cells to fight cancer. Kite’s most advanced CAR-T therapy candidate, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), is currently under priority review by the USFDA. The FDA has set a target action date of November 29, 2017 under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA).
For Gilead, Kite could bring in the much-needed growth. Gilead has been witnessing falling sales of its hepatitis C treatments. It generates most of its sales from anti-infective therapies. Therefore, the acquisition will diversify Gilead’s portfolio. It will also boost Gilead’s emerging oncology drug franchise.
For the biotech sector, this acquisition is a big endorsement of the immuno-oncology segment. CAR-T inhibitors allow doctors to create a “personalized” drug tailored to each cancer patient by harvesting their T-cells and modifying them in a laboratory to make them more efficient at combating and killing cancer cells.
Though critics say Gilead has overpaid for Kite, Gilead’s CEO, John Milligan, justified the purchase. “It is certainly our hope that as we are able to drive down manufacturing costs, and as or if these indications broaden to larger patient populations, that we would be able to drive down the prices over time through manufacturing efficiency,” he said.
“CAR-T has the potential to become one of the most powerful anti-cancer agents for hematologic cancers,” Arie
Belldegrun, president and CEO of Kite,
said.
Just days after Gilead’s announcement of its acquisition, the FDA approved Novartis’ Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel), the first CAR-T gene therapy, for certain pediatric and young adult patients with a form of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
The list price of Kymriah is US$ 475,000 for a one-time
treatment.
Bayer-J&J, AZ post promising data on their blood thinners; AZ to
expand UK operations
At the annual meeting of the
European Society of Cardiology held in Barcelona
this week, studies brought to fore several benefits of blood thinners like Johnson
& Johnson and Bayer’s Xarelto, and AstraZeneca’s Brilinta.
A study published in the New
England Journal of Medicine revealed that the combination of a low dose of Xarelto and aspirin cut the risk of heart attacks by
14 percent, strokes by 42 percent, and death by 18 percent. Forty-one out of
every 1,000 people who took the Xarelto-and-aspirin combo would be expected to have a heart attack, stroke, or
heart-related death compared to 54 among those who got aspirin alone.
Next generation anticoagulants, such as Eliquis, had been giving Xarelto a run
for its money.
Similarly, a sub-analysis from
the Pegasus clinical trial, which first reported positive results in 2015, showed that AstraZeneca’s blood-thinner Brilinta cuts the risk of cardiovascular death by 29 percent in patients with a history of heart attacks who keep taking it beyond the standard 12-month initial period. The sub-analysis also showed a risk reduction of 20 percent in all causes of death.
The finding comes as a shot in
the arm for AstraZeneca, which had suffered several clinical failures last year.
AstraZeneca to invest in UK
facility: Meanwhile, AstraZeneca is making huge investments into its Macclesfield campus in England in order to ramp up production. This is Astra’s biggest manufacturing site. The investment — expected to run into tens of millions of pounds – is set to be announced soon.
This investment is likely to take investors by surprise. A month back, Astra’s CEO Pascal Soriot had said he is putting all capital investment decisions on hold due to the uncertainty around Brexit.
The decision comes amid calls for the UK government to do more to support the sector ahead of Brexit. Recently, drugmakers, including AstraZeneca, published a paper calling on the public sector to invest up to US$ 181 million (£140 million) in three new drug manufacturing “centers of excellence” to stimulate the industry and help reverse a long-term decline in UK’s drug exports.
Impressions: 2485
This week, Phispers looks at fresh troubles brewing at Mylan, as rebel investors intensify their demand for remaking the board, and a low-cost rival for EpiPen gets FDA nod. Meanwhile, BMS sold off its API plant in Ireland to South Korea’s SK Biotek and Baxter tied up with CRO Dorizoe for speedier development of generic injectables. There is more news on Dr. Reddy’s, Ipca and CROs this week. Read on.
Tough time for
Mylan as camp to oust directors grows; Adamis to launch EpiPen rival
The war at Mylan — with rebel investors on one side, and the management on the other side — intensified last week as another proxy firm joined
hands with the rebel investors looking to remake the board.
Egan-Jones Proxy
Services joined ISS, Glass Lewis and a group of rebel shareholders in pushing
for the ouster of the board members. Together, they feel Mylan shareholders
should vote against the re-election of six directors.
Mylan shareholders
will meet
in Amsterdam on Thursday, June 22, 2017.
The investors are not just disturbed over Chairman Robert Coury’s US$ 97 million pay package for 2016, but are also upset that Mylan turned away potential acquirer Teva. And that government investigations over
pricing went beyond the EpiPen, and involved its generic drugs as well.
However, Mylan’s CEO Heather Bresch shot back by blaming the company’s problems on external pressures, as opposed to internal missteps.
Meanwhile, Mylan received
another setback last week when Adamis Pharmaceuticals received approval for selling its emergency epinephrine syringes in the US. Adamis’ epinephrine syringes will prove to be a lower cost alternative to Mylan’s widely used EpiPen. Epinephrine
treats severe allergic reactions.
Adamis is reportedly looking
for a marketing partner and would set a price for the product before its launch
sometime in the second half of 2017. Its pre-filled epinephrine syringes would
be sold under the brand name Symjepi.
Trump’s volte-face: Pharma executive order to have positive impact on industry
President Donald Trump has
repeatedly spoken about being tough on the drug industry. Yet, his
administration is yet to take any measure that lives up to his promise of
lowering drug prices.
On the contrary, news reports suggest that Trump administration’s plan to lower prescription drug
prices may end up being friendly to drug companies.
The 'Drug Pricing and Innovation Working Group’, a group of officials from the Trump administration, have been meeting every two weeks to discuss drug pricing. The group is led by Joe Grogan, an associate director at the Office of Management and Budget who worked for Gilead Sciences until March this year. Gilead has been
repeatedly criticized for pricing its hepatitis C drugs at US$ 1,000 per pill.
To solve the
crisis of high drug prices, the group discussed strengthening the monopoly
rights of pharmaceuticals overseas, ending discounts for low-income hospitals
and accelerating drug approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
According to Kaiser Health News, the policies wouldn't ease the cost of prescription
drugs, and might even increase them.
The Trump
administration is preparing the executive order, which could be signed within
weeks.
According to
another news report, the executive order was originally expected to have a
negative impact on the drug industry, but the policies now under consideration
would not do so. For instance, the Trump administration is said to be considering
direct federal agencies to pursue value-based purchasing contracts for drugs.
Another policy under discussion would instruct agencies to pursue trade
policies that would strengthen the intellectual property rights of drug
companies.
The industry too
expects a positive impact. Allergan CEO Brent
Saunders recently said the
executive order on drug pricing could have a positive impact and
he believes his company is well-positioned to handle any changes.
BMS sells its API plant in Ireland to Korea’s SK Biotek
Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) is selling off its API plant in Ireland to South Korea’s SK Biotek. The divestment is in line with BMS’ shift in focus towards biologics manufacturing.
SK Biotek is a unit of South Korea’s third largest conglomerate, SK Holdings. The company has been a BMS ingredient supplier for a decade.
Though the terms
of the deal are not known, it is likely to close in the last quarter of 2017.
SK Biotek will continue to manufacture products BMS currently makes at the
plant, which includes the API for BMS and Pfizer’s anticoagulant Eliquis.
SK Biotek will use
this plant for its contract development and manufacturing business, which is
growing at a healthy pace. It plans to add marketing and R&D operations at
the site, as well as invest in boosting capacity.
“This transaction is an important step to achieve our goal of becoming a leading global CDMO (contract development and marketing organization),” Junku Park, CEO, SK Biotek, said in a statement.
Ipca’s products banned from US; Dr. Reddy’s provides positive inspections updates
Of late, Dr. Reddy’s has been providing positive inspection updates. On
June 16, the company said it received one US FDA observation for its Srikakulam formulation plant, which the company is addressing. However, the company didn’t disclose the nature of the observation.
Three days prior, on June 13, Dr.Reddy’s had received an Establishment Inspection Report (EIR) for its Miryalaguda plant, indicating closure of the
FDA audit. The API plant was inspected by the US regulator in February this
year, and had received three Form 483 observations.
The Miryalaguda plant was one among the three plants for which the company received FDA’s warning letter in November 2015. The warning letter mentioned deviations in good manufacturing practices (GMPs).
Meanwhile, the FDA banned entry of products
of Ipca Lab in the US due to non-compliance with manufacturing norms at three of its facilities. All drugs manufactured at facilities in Ratlam, Indore SEZ and Silvassa will be refused admission in the US until the company can demonstrate that products from these sites are in compliance with prescribed norms.
The company’s API plant at Ratlam and formulations units at Indore SEZ and Silvassa have been under FDA import alert since 2015 for violation of GMPs.
However, few products were exempted from the ban to avoid shortages in the US
market.
Now, only one API
product, chloroquine phosphate manufactured at Ratlam facility, is
exempted from the import ban.
Baxter in
agreement with Dorizoe to speed up development of generic injectables
Global medical products
company Baxter International Inc announced it had entered into an agreement
with Dorizoe Lifesciences Limited (Dorizoe), a full-service global contract research and development organization headquartered in Ahmedabad (India). The agreement will speed up the development of more than 20 generic injectable products—including anti-infectives, oncolytics and cardiovascular medicines.
“This partnership extends Baxter’s growing pipeline of generic injectables, further strengthening our portfolio with a broad range of high-quality essential medicines,” Robert
Felicelli, president, Pharmaceuticals, Baxter, said.
Baxter has been in
an expansion mode. In December last year, Baxter had announced the acquisition of Claris Injectables Limited (Claris) for US$ 625 million. The
acquisition of Claris, which is expected to close in the second half of 2017,
will provide Baxter with a portfolio of molecules in anesthesia and analgesics,
renal, anti-infectives and critical care.
Recently, Baxter
also announced a strategic partnership with ScinoPharm Taiwan, a leading process R&D and API
manufacturing service provider to the global pharmaceutical industry. The
partnership is for developing, manufacturing and commercializing five generic
injectables used in cancer treatment, with an option to add up to 15 additional
injectable molecules.
After AMRI, Parexel International — gets acquired by a PE firm for US$
4.5 billion
This appears to be
a month when private equity firms are continuing to pick up stake in pharma
contract research organizations or CROs. On June 6, global asset manager, the
Carlyle Group (CG) and GTCR LLC (a private equity firm), acquired Albany Molecular Research (AMRI), a global contract research and
manufacturing organization, for about US$ 922 million in cash.
And this week, Parexel International Corp, a US drug research services provider,
got acquired by Pamplona Capital Management LLP in a US$ 4.5 billion deal. There was pressure from investors, including Starboard Value LP, on Parexel to explore a sale. They argued the company’s profit margins have consistently fallen behind those of its peers.
Headquartered near
Boston, Massachusetts, Parexel provides a range of services to the pharma
industry, such as drug development, regulatory consulting, clinical
pharmacology, clinical trials management and reimbursement.
Impressions: 2695
Global
pharmaceutical companies are increasingly focusing on the development of new
biologics. In fact, in 2016, nine out of the top
15 pharmaceutical drugs by sales were of biologic origin. This makes us wonder
what the future holds for manufacturers specializing in drugs that originate
from chemical synthesis.
This
week, PharmaCompass continued its analysis of the top pharma drugs by
sales to evaluate the drugs that registered large sales growth in 2016.
Click here to Access All the 2016 Data (Excel version available) for FREE!
Please
note that these are not the top-selling drugs, but are the top 10 drugs that
registered the maximum growth in global sales over 2015.
Interestingly, things didn’t appear that bad for drugs originating from chemical synthesis — while the top two drugs on the list were biologics, the remaining originated from chemical synthesis.
Here’s a list of drugs that witnessed the largest sales growth in 2016:
1. Opdivo (nivolumab) – Bristol-Myers Squibb
2016
sales: US$ 3,774 million
2015 sales:
US$ 942 million
Sales
growth: US$ 2,832 million
First
approved in 2014, Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Opdivo and Merck’s Keytruda — also known as checkpoint inhibitors — continued to stay on track to be among the top 20 best-selling drugs in the world by 2020. They represent the hot new field of immunotherapy and are known to have given 90-year old Jimmy Carter (former President of the United States) hope in his fight against cancer.
With
a sales growth of US$ 2.832 billion, Opdivo registered the highest sales growth
of any single drug in 2016. However, Bristol-Myers Squibb received a nasty
surprise last year when Opdivo did not demonstrate the desired slowdown in the
progress of advanced lung cancer in a trial, as compared to conventional
chemotherapy.
While Bristol-Myers’ stock price plunged on this news, Merck announced that not only did Keytruda succeed in a clinical trial as an initial treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, but patients actually lived longer. Although Keytruda did not make it to our list of top 10 drugs by sales growth in 2016, it did register a sales increase of US$ 836 million, as its sales grew from US$ 566 million to US$ 1,402 million.
Click here to Access All the 2016 Data (Excel version available) for FREE!
2. Humira (adalimumab) – AbbVie
2016
sales: US$ 16,078 million
2015
sales: US$ 14,012 million
Sales
growth: US$ 2,066 million
Abbvie’s Humira (adalimumab)
juggernaut continued as it not only remained the best-selling drug in the
world, but also added another US$ 2 billion to its 2015 sales by generating
record sales of US $16.078 billion in 2016.
Last
year, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Amgen’s Amjevita™ (adalimumab – atto) — a biosimilar of Humira®. Therefore, it remains to be seen if Humira will be able to sustain the momentum. Amjevita was approved for treating adults with a variety of medical conditions ranging from rheumatoid arthritis, plaque psoriasis, to ulcerative colitis.
3. Epclusa (sofosbuvir and velpatasvir) – Gilead
2016
sales: US$ 1,752 million (new launch)
Gilead’s third sofosbuvir-based regimen — Epclusa (sofosbuvir and velpatasvir) was approved by the US FDA in June 2016. It is the first and only all-oral, pan-genotypic single tablet regimen for chronic Hepatitis C virus infection. While Epclusa registered an impressive start, Gilead's other two sofosbuvir-based treatments — Sovaldi (sofosbuvir) and Harvoni (sofosbuvir and lepidasvir) — saw their combined sales decline by almost US$ 6 billion.
Click here to Access All the 2016 Data (Excel version available) for FREE!
4. Imbruvica (ibrutinib) — Johnson & Johnson / AbbVie
2016
sales: US$ 3,083 million
2015
sales: US$ 1,443 million
Sales
growth: US$ 1,640 million
Abbvie’s 2015 US$ 21 billion buy of Pharmacyclics seems to be paying off.
The Pharmacyclics buy was a way to get access to Imbruvica (ibrutinib), a cancer drug which
is co-marketed with Johnson & Johnson. It generated sales of US$ 3.083 billion in 2016. Imbruvica works by blocking a specific protein called Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK). In December 2011, Johnson & Johnson said it would pay Pharmacyclics as much as US$ 975 million to fund getting the drug to market in exchange for half the profits generated globally.
5. Eliquis (apixaban) -
Bristol-Myers Squibb / Pfizer
2016
sales: US$ 3,342 million
2015
sales: US$ 1,860 million
Sales
growth: US$ 1,483 million
Although
apixaban was the third-to-market
novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC), which is co-promoted by Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb as Eliquis, it continues to unseat Johnson & Johnson’s Xarelto (rivaroxaban) as the leader in its
class based on total prescriptions. Rivaroxaban's total 2016 sales were US$
5.392 billion.
While Pfizer’s reports its sales as part of Alliance revenues, and exact sales are not known, Bristol-Myers Squibb results alone put Eliquis in the top 10 list. Generics are hot on their tail as, last month, Pfizer and Bristol-Myers’ filed suits against 16 generic makers to uphold their patents for apixaban.
6. Genvoya (elvitegravir,
cobicistat, emtricitabine, tenofovir alafenamide) — Gilead
2016
sales: US$ 1,484 million
2015
sales: US$ 45 million
Sales
growth: US$ 1,439 million
Genvoya has been the most
successful HIV treatment launch since the introduction of Atripla (the first
single-tablet regimen launched a decade ago). Gilead is the dominant HIV
player in the US market and has the top three most-prescribed HIV regimens in
the US.
Genvoya
adds Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) to already known
treatments. TAF based drugs have demonstrated a better safety profile. They
would also allow Gilead to maintain its dominance in the HIV market.
Click here to Access All the 2016 Data (Excel version available) for FREE!
7. Ibrance (palbociclib) — Pfizer
2016
sales: US$ 2,135 million
2015
sales: US$ 723 million
Sales
growth: US$ 1,412 million
Discovered
in Pfizer laboratories and approved by the US
FDA in February 2015, Ibrance is used in combination
with Letrozole as a first-line
treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, human
epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) metastatic breast
cancer.
8. Triumeq (abacavir,
dolutegravir, lamivudine) – GlaxoSmithKline
2016
sales:US$ 2,151 million
2015
sales: US$ 905 million
Sales
growth: US$ 1,246 million
GlaxoSmithKline's HIV drugs business — ViiV Healthcare — has been enjoying sales growth with the introduction of Triumeq ® in its portfolio. While GSK is the major shareholder in ViiV Healthcare, Pfizer and Shionogi also have a stake. Triumeq® is the company’s first fixed-dose combination tablet for a once-daily single pill regimen that combines dolutegravir, an integrase inhibitor, with the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors — abacavir and lamivudine.
9. Revlimid (lenalidomide) – Celgene
2016
sales: US$ 6,974 million
2015
sales: US$ 5,801 million
Sales
growth: US$ 1,173 million
Celgene’s Revlimid (lenalidomide) — a thalidomide-derivative introduced in 2004 as an immunomodulatory agent for the treatment of various cancers such as multiple myeloma — brought in US$ 5.8 billion in 2015, and grew another 20 percent this year, to US $6.974 billion. Revlimid now contributes more than 60 percent to Celgene's total sales of US$ 11.229 billion.
10. Xarelto (rivaroxaban) – Johnson & Johnson (US) and Bayer
2016
sales: US$ 5,392 million
2015
sales: US$ 4,255 million
Sales
growth: US$ 1,137 million
Bayer’s Xarelto, which is promoted by Johnson & Johnson in the United States, provided patients with an alternative to the old-guard therapy — warfarin. While rivaroxaban is competing with other
novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) like Eliquis (apixaban) and Pradaxa (dabigatran), rivaroxaban has the
class lead in indications.
Xarelto
recently posted positive results in a large-scale Phase 3 study —COMPASS, involving 27,402 patients, that assessed the effect of the
blood thinner in preventing major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
The
trial was stopped a year early
on the advice of an independent Data Monitoring Committee, after the primary
endpoint of prevention of MACE (which includes cardiovascular death, myocardial
infarction and stroke) reached its pre-specified criteria for superiority over aspirin.
Click here to Access All the 2016 Data (Excel version available) for FREE!
Our
view
In QuintilesIMS Institute’s new annual drug spending report, analysts have forecasted that
over the coming five years the industry should continue to receive 40 to 45 new
drug approvals every year.
A quarter of all the drugs in late-stage development are now
focused on oncology. The rate of oncology drug development has hit such a
rapid pace that new drugs are superseding old ones in a matter of a few years.
It’s clear that this compilation will see radical changes next year. However, with eight out of the 10 fastest-selling drugs coming from chemical synthesis, traditional generic manufacturers still have a lot of opportunities to explore.
Sign up,
stay ahead
In order to stay informed,
and receive industry updates along with our data compilations, do sign up for
the PharmaCompass Newsletter and you will receive updated information as
it becomes available along with a lot more industry analysis.
Click here to Access All the 2016 Data (Excel version available) for FREE!
Impressions: 9289
This week, Phispers brings you news about Teva — which received a warning letter from the FDA for its China facility and a setback from the Mexican regulator in its ongoing legal battle with Rimsa. Also, there is news on how Aspen employees allegedly destroyed stocks of life-saving drugs, along with news on Eli Lilly, Korea’s Hanmi and Pfizer-BMS. Read on.
FDA issues warning letter to Teva’s China facility; Mexico regulator supports Rimsa
In a difficult
week for Teva, the world’s largest manufacturer of generic drugs reported that its facility in China got a warning letter
from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).The warning letter
came in on April 10, based on a regulatory inspection carried out in September
last year. Teva said they are in the process of addressing the concerns raised
by the FDA and will respond to the regulator by May 1.
The FDA referenced several deficiencies at Teva’s active pharmaceutical (API) plant pertaining to production controls and sampling techniques and processes.
To make matters
worse for the Israeli drugmaker, Mexico’s pharmaceutical regulator — Federal Commission for the Protection against Sanitary Risk (COFEPRIS) — issued a memorandum that appears to undermine the claims of Teva against drugmaker
Representaciones e Investigaciones Medicas SA, known as Rimsa, which it acquired for US $2.3 billion in 2015.
In the memorandum,
COFEPRIS says it found no “unexpected adverse effects” in 147
drugs produced by Rimsa. It said the drugs were safe. Teva is engaged in a
legal battle against Rimsa for allegedly selling defective products and duping
regulators.
In September 2016, the former owners of Rimsa had filed a legal suit in a New York State court against Teva’s subsidiary Lemery SA, saying Teva was suffering from “a classic case of buyers’ remorse” and was therefore alleging that the
former owners fraudulently induced it to purchase the Rimsa companies.
Teva has had issues with the FDA since last year. And these have affected
its operations. The company
has received two warning letters in just six months, say news reports.
Aspen’s staff plotted to destroy stocks of life-saving drugs
Employees at Africa’s leading drug company — Aspen Pharmacare — reportedly plotted to destroy stocks of life-saving medicines during a price dispute with the Spanish health service in 2014. In fact, leaked internal emails suggest that employees at Aspen called for a “celebration” over price hikes of cancer drugs, an investigation has revealed.
In October last
year, Italian antitrust authorities fined Aspen nearly US $ 5.5 million
for halting supplies of several cancer drugs. The authorities viewed this as a
negotiating tactic to hike the prices of these cancer drugs by as much as 1,500
percent. The price-gouging episode began after Aspen purchased five different
cancer drugs from GlaxoSmithKline. It then began negotiations with the
Italian Medicines Agency over pricing for the cancer medicines.
This news from
Aspen comes at a time when Baxter’s possible price fixing of intravenous
(IV) saline has led to an employee being subpoenaed. Baxter said the subpoena, obtained by federal investigators, is “pursuant to a criminal investigation”. It calls for the employee to produce documents and
testimony related to pricing, shortages of Baxter's IV solutions “and communications with competitors regarding the same,” the company said.
BMS, Pfizer
hope to slow generic competition to Eliquis through patent suits
Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb have filed 16 patent infringement suits
against generic drug makers over the last fortnight. And these include legal
suits against companies like Mylan, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories and Accord Healthcare.
With these patent
infringement lawsuits, the two companies hope to slow the advance of generic versions of
their shared blockbuster Eliquis.
Eliquis is a stroke and blood clot preventer that brought in about
US $3.3 billion for BMS last year, up nearly 60 percent from the US $1.9
billion earned the year before. Pfizer, on the other hand, earned US $1.6
billion from this drug.
The two companies have gone to great lengths to protect and promote this drug — which is a top-selling product for both companies. Pfizer spent US $174 million on direct-to-consumer advertising for Eliquis last year.
Modi says India
may bring legal framework for doctors to prescribe generics
India is keen on encouraging cheaper generics over branded drugs. India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday indicated that his government may bring in a legal framework under
which doctors will have to prescribe generic medicines to their patients, which
are cheaper than the corresponding branded drugs.
The government has
brought in a health policy after 15 years and capped the prices of medicines
and stents, which has angered some pharmaceutical companies, Modi said.
“Doctors write prescriptions in such a way that poor people do not understand the handwriting, and he has to buy that medicine from private stores at high prices,” Modi said.
“It is the government’s responsibility that everybody should get health services at minimal price,” he added.
FDA tells
Lilly to do more work on its new rheumatoid arthritis drug
Eli Lilly was not able to pacify FDA’s concerns over the safety risks of its much anticipated rheumatoid arthritis drug — baricitinib.
The
Indianapolis-based drug company and its partner Incyte were expecting an
approval for baricitinib. Instead, they received a complete response (CRL)
letter from the FDA, which said they need to do more work on the drug.
FDA wants to see
additional clinical data to get the doses right and to better characterize
safety concerns for the once-daily oral medication for moderate-to-severe
rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Eli Lilly said.
More trials will increase the time and money
that Eli Lilly and Incyte spend on baricitinib before its approval. Incyte and Lilly both said they are committed to working with the
agency to get approval.
“We are disappointed with this action. We remain confident in the benefit/risk of baricitinib as a new treatment option for adults with moderate-to-severe RA,” Christi Shaw, president of Lilly Bio-Medicines, said in a statement. “We will continue to work with the FDA to determine a path forward and ultimately bring baricitinib to patients in the US,” Shaw added.
Controversy around Korea’s Hanmi and the death of a patient
Korean drug maker Hanmi is involved in a controversy pertaining to its cancer drug — olmutinib. A Korean patient taking this drug died from a rare case of Stevens-Johnson syndrome. And the death was reported after 14 months to the country’s health authorities. As a result, Hanmi’s partner — Boehringer Ingelheim — abruptly withdrew from their US $730 million partnership for olmutinib.
The death of the
patient occurred in July 2015, when the patient was taking olmutinib and two
other drugs. The physicians involved in the case said it was triggered by the
other drugs and reported the case to a monitoring agency. But it was not
reported as an unexpected serious adverse event. Hanmi and the agency finally
reported the death to health officials in September, 2016.
According to
Korean officials, Hanmi broke two medical laws related to monitoring and
reporting clinical trials. The opposition party in Korea said the influential
Hanmi had intentionally delayed reporting the death so it could get the drug
approved in Korea. But investigators say they found no evidence of that.
Impressions: 2986