Donepezil
Top drugs and pharmaceutical companies of 2019 by revenues
Acquisitions and spin-offs dominated headlines in 2019 and the tone was set very early with Bristol-Myers Squibb acquiring New Jersey-based cancer drug company Celgene in a US$ 74 billion deal announced on January 3, 2019. After factoring in debt, the deal value ballooned to about US$ 95 billion, which according to data compiled by Refinitiv, made it the largest healthcare deal on record. In the summer, AbbVie Inc, which sells the world’s best-selling drug Humira, announced its acquisition of Allergan Plc, known for Botox and other cosmetic treatments, for US$ 63 billion. While the companies are still awaiting regulatory approval for their deal, with US$ 49 billion in combined 2019 revenues, the merged entity would rank amongst the biggest in the industry. View Our Interactive Dashboard on Top drugs by sales in 2019 (Free Excel Available) The big five by pharmaceutical sales — Pfizer, Roche, J&J, Novartis and Merck Pfizer continued to lead companies by pharmaceutical sales by reporting annual 2019 revenues of US$ 51.8 billion, a decrease of US$ 1.9 billion, or 4 percent, compared to 2018. The decline was primarily attributed to the loss of exclusivity of Lyrica in 2019, which witnessed its sales drop from US$ 5 billion in 2018 to US$ 3.3 billion in 2019. In 2018, Pfizer’s then incoming CEO Albert Bourla had mentioned that the company did not see the need for any large-scale M&A activity as Pfizer had “the best pipeline” in its history, which needed the company to focus on deploying its capital to keep its pipeline flowing and execute on its drug launches. Bourla stayed true to his word and barring the acquisition of Array Biopharma for US$ 11.4 billion and a spin-off to merge Upjohn, Pfizer’s off-patent branded and generic established medicines business with Mylan, there weren’t any other big ticket deals which were announced. The Upjohn-Mylan merged entity will be called Viatris and is expected to have 2020 revenues between US$ 19 and US$ 20 billion and could outpace Teva to become the largest generic company in the world, in term of revenues.  Novartis, which had followed Pfizer with the second largest revenues in the pharmaceutical industry in 2018, reported its first full year earnings after spinning off its Alcon eye care devices business division that had US$ 7.15 billion in 2018 sales. In 2019, Novartis slipped two spots in the ranking after reporting total sales of US$ 47.4 billion and its CEO Vas Narasimhan continued his deal-making spree by buying New Jersey-headquartered The Medicines Company (MedCo) for US$ 9.7 billion to acquire a late-stage cholesterol-lowering therapy named inclisiran. As Takeda Pharmaceutical Co was busy in 2019 on working to reduce its debt burden incurred due to its US$ 62 billion purchase of Shire Plc, which was announced in 2018, Novartis also purchased the eye-disease medicine, Xiidra, from the Japanese drugmaker for US$ 5.3 billion. Novartis’ management also spent a considerable part of 2019 dealing with data-integrity concerns which emerged from its 2018 buyout of AveXis, the gene-therapy maker Novartis had acquired for US$ 8.7 billion. The deal gave Novartis rights to Zolgensma, a novel treatment intended for children less than two years of age with the most severe form of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Priced at US$ 2.1 million, Zolgensma is currently the world’s most expensive drug. However, in a shocking announcement, a month after approving the drug, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a press release on data accuracy issues as the agency was informed by AveXis that its personnel had manipulated data which the FDA used to evaluate product comparability and nonclinical (animal) pharmacology as part of the biologics license application (BLA), which was submitted and reviewed by the FDA. With US$ 50.0 billion (CHF 48.5 billion) in annual pharmaceutical sales, Swiss drugmaker Roche came in at number two position in 2019 as its sales grew 11 percent driven by its multiple sclerosis medicine Ocrevus, haemophilia drug Hemlibra and cancer medicines Tecentriq and Perjeta. Roche’s newly introduced medicines generated US$ 5.53 billion (CHF 5.4 billion) in growth, helping offset the impact of the competition from biosimilars for its three best-selling drugs MabThera/Rituxan, Herceptin and Avastin. In late 2019, after months of increased antitrust scrutiny, Roche completed its US$ 5.1 billion acquisition of Spark Therapeutics to strengthen its presence in gene therapy. Last year, J&J reported almost flat worldwide sales of US$ 82.1 billion. J&J’s pharmaceutical division generated US$ 42.20 billion and its medical devices and consumer health divisions brought in US$ 25.96 billion and US$ 13.89 billion respectively.  Since J&J’s consumer health division sells analgesics, digestive health along with beauty and oral care products, the US$ 5.43 billion in consumer health sales from over-the-counter drugs and women’s health products was only used in our assessment of J&J’s total pharmaceutical revenues. With combined pharmaceutical sales of US$ 47.63 billion, J&J made it to number three on our list. While the sales of products like Stelara, Darzalex, Imbruvica, Invega Sustenna drove J&J’s pharmaceutical business to grow by 4 percent over 2018, the firm had to contend with generic competition against key revenue contributors Remicade and Zytiga. US-headquartered Merck, which is known as MSD (short for Merck Sharp & Dohme) outside the United States and Canada, is set to significantly move up the rankings next year fueled by its cancer drug Keytruda, which witnessed a 55 percent increase in sales to US$ 11.1 billion. Merck reported total revenues of US$ 41.75 billion and also announced it will spin off its women’s health drugs, biosimilar drugs and older products to create a new pharmaceutical company with US$ 6.5 billion in annual revenues. The firm had anticipated 2020 sales between US$ 48.8 billion and US$  50.3 billion however this week it announced that the coronavirus  pandemic will reduce 2020 sales by more than $2 billion. View Our Interactive Dashboard on Top drugs by sales in 2019 (Free Excel Available)  Humira holds on to remain world’s best-selling drug AbbVie’s acquisition of Allergan comes as the firm faces the expiration of patent protection for Humira, which brought in a staggering US$ 19.2 billion in sales last year for the company. AbbVie has failed to successfully acquire or develop a major new product to replace the sales generated by its flagship drug. In 2019, Humira’s US revenues increased 8.6 percent to US$ 14.86 billion while internationally, due to biosimilar competition, the sales dropped 31.1 percent to US$ 4.30 billion. Bristol Myers Squibb’s Eliquis, which is also marketed by Pfizer, maintained its number two position and posted total sales of US$ 12.1 billion, a 23 percent increase over 2018. While Bristol Myers Squibb’s immunotherapy treatment Opdivo, sold in partnership with Ono in Japan, saw sales increase from US$ 7.57 billion to US$ 8.0 billion, the growth paled in comparison to the US$ 3.9 billion revenue increase of Opdivo’s key immunotherapy competitor Merck’s Keytruda. Keytruda took the number three spot in drug sales that previously belonged to Celgene’s Revlimid, which witnessed a sales decline from US$ 9.69 billion to US$ 9.4 billion. Cancer treatment Imbruvica, which is marketed by J&J and AbbVie, witnessed a 30 percent increase in sales. With US$ 8.1 billion in 2019 revenues, it took the number five position. View Our Interactive Dashboard on Top drugs by sales in 2019 (Free Excel Available) Vaccines – Covid-19 turns competitors into partners This year has been dominated by the single biggest health emergency in years — the novel coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic. As drugs continue to fail to meet expectations, vaccine development has received a lot of attention.  GSK reported the highest vaccine sales of all drugmakers with total sales of US$ 8.4 billion (GBP 7.16 billion), a significant portion of its total sales of US$ 41.8 billion (GBP 33.754 billion).   US-based Merck’s vaccine division also reported a significant increase in sales to US$ 8.0 billion and in 2019 received FDA and EU approval to market its Ebola vaccine Ervebo. This is the first FDA-authorized vaccine against the deadly virus which causes hemorrhagic fever and spreads from person to person through direct contact with body fluids. Pfizer and Sanofi also reported an increase in their vaccine sales to US$ 6.4 billion and US$ 6.2 billion respectively and the Covid-19 pandemic has recently pushed drugmakers to move faster than ever before and has also converted competitors into partners. In a rare move, drug behemoths  — Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) —joined hands to develop a vaccine for the novel coronavirus. The two companies plan to start human trials in the second half of this year, and if things go right, they will file for potential approvals by the second half of 2021.  View Our Interactive Dashboard on Top drugs by sales in 2019 (Free Excel Available)  Our view Covid-19 has brought the world economy to a grinding halt and shifted the global attention to the pharmaceutical industry’s capability to deliver solutions to address this pandemic.  Our compilation shows that vaccines and drugs for infectious diseases currently form a tiny fraction of the total sales of pharmaceutical companies and few drugs against infectious diseases rank high on the sales list. This could well explain the limited range of options currently available to fight Covid-19. With the pandemic currently infecting over 3 million people spread across more than 200 countries, we can safely conclude that the scenario in 2020 will change substantially. And so should our compilation of top drugs for the year. View Our Interactive Dashboard on Top drugs by sales in 2019 (Free Excel Available)   

Impressions: 54819

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/top-drugs-and-pharmaceutical-companies-of-2019-by-revenues

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
29 Apr 2020
Did a 29 year-old show GlaxoSmithKline that it made a billion dollar mistake?
29 year-old healthcare investor, Vivek Ramaswamy, bought an old Alzheimer's drug that GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) had dropped for $5 million. Six months later, without doing any clinical development at all, the drug resulted in the biggest biotech IPO ever (Initial Public Offering), two weeks ago and got valued at over $2 billion!It’s clear that either GSK, or Wall Street, have no idea what they are talking about.  Indian American, Vivek Ramaswamy left “hedge fund QVT in May 2014 to form what is essentially a shell company, Roivant Sciences. In October 2014, Roivant spins off a subsidiary Axovant Sciences”. Axovant then bought an Alzheimer’s experimental drug for $5m in December from GSK, which had shelved the compound four years ago after testing it in 13 trials and 1,250 patients. Is the world really crazy to trust a 29 year-old more than GSK?The miracle drugSetting aside allegations that the IPO was designed to favor Ramaswamy’s hedge fund friends and family, the drug: 3-Phenylsulfonyl-8-(piperazin-1-yl) quinolone (also known as SB-742457 and RVT-101), failed to meet the desired endpoints in the several clinical trials that GSK ran.  However, there was one exception that when the drug is taken with widely used, Alzheimer’s treatment, Aricept, it showed a slower decline in cognition than Aricept alone. So what’s the big deal?Alzheimer's disease offers one of the most lucrative markets in the pharma business, with one analyst estimating the opportunity to be $20 billion. However, the drug research is also considered to be a “wild-goose chase” given the limited understanding of the disease’s biology, which in turn makes clinical trials very expensive to run. From 2002 to 2012, there was just a .04% success rate (or 99.6% failure rate) of Alzheimer’s drugs meeting the standard. It’s all about the people!Axovant has assembled a team, which includes Aricept developer, Lawrence Friedhoff (developer of the second-most widely used drug to treat Alzheimer’s disease, Namenda) and Atul Pande (former head of the neurosciences unit of GSK that led the development of RVT-101). Axovant’s all-star team has taken on the responsibility to bring the drug to market and Wall Street valuation believes this will be possible.  Wall Street expectations aside, could Glaxo really be this wrong?Drugs under clinical research constantly get picked up and dropped. Rejection is really no big deal since many molecules get rejected by the FDA in the first review only to be approved years later. The list is surprisingly long for products, which got rejected before being approved and includes: thrice rejected Aveed (testosterone) by Endo Pharmaceuticals, weight loss pill Belviq (lorcaserin), almost approved “female Viagra” Flibanserin and many more. In the case of the antibiotic oritavancin (Orbactiv), it took more than 20 years to come to market and involved four ownership changes before it got final approval. The big question however is always whether the fate will be surreal like that of pirfenidone, or a horror story like Diapep277. InterMune’s pirfenidone, got rejected by the FDA in 2010 due to the drug’s unconvincing efficacy at the time, only to be approved last year and get acquired by Roche for $8.5 billion. Potential type I diabetes treatment DiaPep277 is however a horror story. Licensed to Sanofi by the originator, Peptor Ltd., it got returned by the French pharma giant two years later, only to generate Teva’s interest. Teva invested $170 million to fund further clinical trials. However, the drug underwent a series of changes in ownership and finally, when Hyperion acquired rights to the drug last year, for an amount that could have reached $570 million, they found that the clinical data had been falsified…Hyperion subsequently cancelled the acquisition! Wish to join the Axovant party?It’s clear that rejection of a drug at any stage is never the end of the road for that particular molecule since it can always emerge in a different format to get approval. There is a significant shift, where a significant amount of clinical trial data is going to be made public by pharmaceutical companies. It may be worthwhile to adopt an Axovant model and move some resources from the lab bench to the computer screen! The other reason to look for once-rejected drugs is that their valid patent life would be effectively shorter, when compared with ‘first-time-through’ products.Axovant’s success will benefit patients of Alzheimer’s and certainly make GSK conduct a serious internal review on how they handle their drug development programs.  

Impressions: 10546

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/did-a-29-year-old-show-glaxosmithkline-that-it-made-a-billion-dollar-mistake

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
25 Jun 2015
Will data integrity concerns on clinical trials done at GVK Biosciences go beyond Europe?
 Over 700 commonly used generic medicines were recommended for suspension by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) based on data integrity concerns, over clinical studies conducted at GVK Biosciences in Hyderabad, India.What will be the global fallout of the European decision? The European decision has impacted products from companies such as:Abbott Laboratories, Accord Healthcare (Intas), Actavis, Alembic, Apotex, Betapharm (Dr. Reddy’s), Brown & Burk UK, Fair Med Healthcare AG, Glenmark, Lupin, Micro Labs, Mylan, Orion Corporation, Ranbaxy, Ratiopharm, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, Stada, Teva, Torrent, Wockhardt, Zydus… and many, many more.The original recommendation of suspending some of the medicines made in January 2015, was an outcome of an inspection of GVK Biosciences’ site in Hyderabad (GVK BIO is a Clinical Research Organization- CRO) by the French medicines agency (ANSM) through the EMA. The EMA stated in their official release: “The inspection revealed data manipulations of electrocardiograms (ECGs) during the conduct of some studies of generic medicines, which appeared to have taken place over a period of at least five years. Their systematic nature, the extended period of time during which they took place and the number of members of staff involved cast doubt on the integrity of the conduct of trials at the site.” 1000 drugs reviewed// 700 rejectedWhile over 1,000 pharmaceutical forms and strengths were reviewed at the GVK site, over 300 of them had sufficient supporting data available from other sources. As a result, these medicines were allowed to remain on the market in the EU.However, for the over 700 other medicines, the EMA after its second review, maintained its previous recommendation of January 2015, to suspend medicines, where no additional supporting data from other studies was available. Only one exception after that second review was spared from suspension, as the company was able to address the EMA’s concerns: it was Bivolet Nebivolol (5 mg tablets/ marketing authorisation holder: Neo Balkanika EOOD).While the agency noted that “there is no evidence of harm or lack of effectiveness linked to the conduct of studies by GVK Biosciences at Hyderabad. Some of these medicines may remain on the market” if they are of critical importance for patients. However, the recommendation will now be sent to the European Commission for a legally binding decision, which will apply to Member States regardless of the decision taken in the interim period.The updated list of medicines for which, the CHMP (Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use) recommends suspension, is available on the EMA website. Companies are given 12 months to submit additional data. The potential global impact of the European suspensions?The GVK Biosciences scandal is almost as severe in magnitude and impact, as the data falsification concerns, which were discovered at Ranbaxy (Katherine Eban’s stunning investigation in Fortune, “Dirty Medicine” covers this extensively). One of the main promoters of GVK Biosciences is Mr. D.S. Brar who was CEO & Managing Director of Ranbaxy from 1999-2004. The impact of GVK Biosciences’ misdeeds is already being felt on new product launches. Mylan recently withdrew its European application for generic Abilify (aripiprazole) (2014 sales US$6.2x billion) citing “identification of major GCP issues (Good Clinical Practices).” What about the impact on the US market?In 2010, FDA discovered data integrity violations, which bankrupted clinical research organization, Cetero Research/PRACS. Based on the Cetero findings in the United States, the EMA suspended seven drugs. Now it remains to be seen, how the FDA will handle the data integrity concerns found in Europe since products like repaglinide & candesartan cilexitil (Mylan), levetiracetam (Dr. Reddy’s), clonazepam (Sandoz), metformin hydrochloride (Actavis), tacrolimus (Panacea Biotech) all have U.S. FDA approvals.  Leading GVK Biosciences’ defense is the Indian government, who warned last month that if the European Union does not reconsider their decision, it may go to the World Trade Organization. The Indian government’s position is based on an appeal by GVK Biosciences, which made the “Indian government set up a panel of experts last year to investigate the matter and found no manipulation”, GVK Biosciences CEO Manni Kantipudi told Reuters.However, globally reputed GMP expert, Lachman Consultants, believes that the GVK Bioscience episode “could potentially impact data integrity, similar to the Cetero/PRACS case”.It’s clear for us that this is not the end of the story… 

Impressions: 4114

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/will-data-integrity-concerns-on-clinical-trials-done-at-gvk-biosciences-go-beyond-europe

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
28 May 2015