Amlodipine Besylate
Analyzing over US$ 90 billion of Medicare Prescription Drug (Part D) Spending in 2016
This week, PharmaCompass reviews the recently released data on prescription drugs paid for under the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Program in the United States in calendar year 2016. But first, let’s understand what is Medicare. Medicare is the federal health insurance program in the US. In 2017, it covered 58.4 million people — 49.5 million aged 65 and older, and 8.9 million disabled.  Prescription drug coverage under this program was started in 2006, and is known as Medicare Part D. As part of this coverage, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) contracts insurance companies and other private companies, known as plan sponsors, that offer prescription drug plans to their beneficiaries with varying drug coverage and cost-sharing requirements. In 2017, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) had estimated that spending on Medicare Part D would reach US$ 94 billion, or about 16 percent of all Medicare expenditures for the year. Click here to access the compilation of Medicare Part D Prescriber Summary Report According to the CBO, Medicare Part D is the most significant expansion of the Medicare program since it was created by Congress in 1965. With more than 1.48 billion claims from beneficiaries enrolled under the Part D prescription drug benefit program under its umbrella, our analysis of Medicare Part D provides valuable insights into how elderly Americans use prescription drugs. Top 10 drugs by cost: The ones that bore the highest cost burden for Medicare   As in 2015, in 2016 too Gilead’s Hepatitis C treatment — Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir (Harvoni) — remained the single drug highest payout under the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Program with a total cost of US$ 4.4 billion.  As Gilead continued to face competition from AbbVie and Merck in the Hepatitis C space, the spending on Harvoni was down 37 percent from US$ 7.03 billion in 2015. Click here to access the compilation of Medicare Part D Prescriber Summary Report Celgene’s cancer treatment, Lenalidomide (Revlimid), Sanofi and Merck’s diabetes treatments and AstraZeneca’s Crestor (Rosuvastatin Calcium) for cholesterol followed Harvoni. All together, they cost the Medicare program over US$ 10 billion. Generic Name Number of Medicare Part D Claims Number of Medicare Beneficiaries Number of Prescribers Aggregate Cost Paid for Part D Claims (In USD) LEDIPASVIR/ SOFOSBUVIR (HARVONI) 141,665 52,782 12,097 4,398,534,465 LENALIDOMIDE 239,049 35,368 10,382 2,661,106,127 LANTUS SOLOSTAR (INSULIN GLARGINE, HUM.REC.ANLOG ) 5,028,485 1,075,248 245,447 2,526,048,766 SITAGLIPTIN PHOSPHATE 4,742,505 864,442 206,223 2,440,013,513 ROSUVASTATIN CALCIUM 6,012,444 1,560,050 249,981 2,322,724,007 FLUTICASONE/SALMETEROL 5,194,391 1,196,007 275,442 2,319,808,482 PREGABALIN 4,940,115 852,497 267,532 2,098,953,250 RIVAROXABAN 4,403,332 807,820 252,141 1,954,748,890 APIXABAN 4,455,782 826,969 231,631 1,926,107,484 TIOTROPIUM BROMIDE 4,153,162 903,494 235,564 1,818,857,361 Click here to access the compilation of Medicare Part D Prescriber Summary Report Top 10 drugs by claims: The most commonly used drugs of 2016   With 46.6 million claims, the thyroid hormone deficiency treatment — Levothyroxine Sodium — retained its position of being the most claimed product under Medicare’s Part D Prescription Drug Program in 2016. The number of Medicare Part D claims includes original prescriptions and refills. Following Levothyroxine Sodium was the lipid-lowering agent — Atorvastatin Calcium — which had 44.5 million Medicare Part D claims that were filed by almost 9.4 million beneficiaries. Generic Name Number of Prescribers Number of Medicare Part D Claims Number of Medicare Beneficiaries LEVOTHYROXINE SODIUM 669,999 46,617,109 8,091,785 ATORVASTATIN CALCIUM 494,973 44,595,686 9,435,633 AMLODIPINE BESYLATE 497,017 39,913,468 7,802,905 LISINOPRIL 490,452 39,469,840 8,009,954 OMEPRAZOLE 492,951 32,909,236 7,001,160 METFORMIN HCL 611,700 31,007,932 6,394,014 SIMVASTATIN 380,560 29,687,947 6,201,911 HYDROCODONE/ACETAMINOPHEN 660,617 28,595,150 7,265,882 FUROSEMIDE 488,352 27,878,243 5,421,598 GABAPENTIN 555,997 27,627,466 5,363,382 Click here to access the compilation of Medicare Part D Prescriber Summary Report Top 10 drugs by prescribers: Medicines that were most popular with doctors   Among the prescribers, albuterol sulfate (salbutamol) and Diltiazem had over 900,000 unique providers (or doctors) prescribing the drug. Albuterol (salbutamol) is used to provide quick relief from wheezing and shortness of breath while Diltiazem is used to prevent chest pain (angina). Also on the list of popular drugs with prescribers is Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen. With more doctors prescribing Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (an opioid) than commonly used antibiotics, such as Cephalexin, Ciprofloxacin and Amoxicillin, the series of new FDA initiatives to combat the epidemic of opioid misuse and abuse should change the position of opioids in the top 10 drugs by prescribers in the coming years. Click here to access the compilation of Medicare Part D Prescriber Summary Report Generic Name Number of Prescribers Number of Medicare Part D Claims Number of Medicare Beneficiaries ALBUTEROL SULFATE 985,427 13,100,354 5,417,718 DILTIAZEM HCL 931,159 8,142,004 1,982,550 POTASSIUM CHLORIDE 879,491 18,945,969 4,278,000 PEN NEEDLE, DIABETIC 677,210 5,281,778 1,795,046 LEVOTHYROXINE SODIUM 669,999 46,617,109 8,091,785 HYDROCODONE/ACETAMINOPHEN 660,617 28,595,150 7,265,882 METFORMIN HCL 611,700 31,007,932 6,394,014 CEPHALEXIN 597,647 5,603,879 3,933,373 CIPROFLOXACIN HCL 594,129 7,000,081 4,851,657 AZITHROMYCIN 591,028 7,958,625 5,734,122   What does the future hold?   Although the Part D Prescriber PUF (public use file) has a wealth of information on payment and utilization for Medicare Part D prescriptions, the dataset has a number of limitations.  Of particular importance is the fact that the data may not be representative of a physician’s entire practice or all of Medicare as it only includes information on beneficiaries enrolled in the Medicare Part D prescription drug program (i.e., approximately two-thirds of all Medicare beneficiaries).   Click here to access the compilation of Medicare Part D Prescriber Summary Report Last month, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) reviewed the Part D claims data for the years 2011 to 2015 for brand-name drugs. The OIG’s report found that the total reimbursement for all brand-name drugs in Part D increased 77 percent from 2011 to 2015, despite a 17-percent decrease in the number of prescriptions for these drugs.  With soaring drug prices being an issue for regular debate in the Unites States and President Trump announcing that his team will use strategies to strengthen the negotiating powers under Medicare Part D and Part B, it remains to be seen how the data on prescription drugs paid for under the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Program will change in the coming years. Click here to access the compilation of Medicare Part D Prescriber Summary Report  

Impressions: 2481

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/analyzing-over-us-90-billion-of-medicare-prescription-drug-part-d-spending-in-2016

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
05 Jul 2018
Drug costs and prescription trends in the United States: Analyzing Medicare’s $121 billion spend
In less than three weeks, Donald Trump will assume office as the President of the United States. He has mentioned that he wants Medicare (a national social insurance program) to directly negotiate the price it pays for prescription drugs. Medicare provides health insurance to Americans aged 65 or more, who have worked and paid into the system through the payroll tax. It also provides health insurance to younger people with some disabilities or end-stage renal disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In 2015, Medicare provided health insurance to over 55 million Americans — including 46 million people aged 65 or more, and nine million younger people. As we flag off the New Year, PharmaCompass provides insights into drug prices and prescription patterns in the US in order to help professionals make informed decisions. We believe that the cost of medicines in the US, which have been a subject of much public outcry and discussions in the recent years, will continue to be scrutinized during 2017.   Medicare data for 2014 Medicare Part D, also known as the Medicare prescription drug benefit — the program which subsidizes the costs of prescription drugs and prescription drug insurance premiums for Medicare beneficiaries — published a data set (for calendar year 2014) which contains information from over one million healthcare providers who collectively prescribed approximately US $121 billion worth of prescription drugs paid for under this program. For each prescriber and drug, the dataset includes the total number of prescriptions that were dispensed (including original prescriptions and any refills), and the total drug cost. The total drug cost includes the ingredient cost of the medication, dispensing fees, sales tax, and any applicable administration fees. It’s based on the amounts paid by the Part D plan, the Medicare beneficiary, other government subsidies, and any other third-party payers (such as employers and liability insurers).  The total drug cost does not reflect any manufacturer rebates paid to Part D plan sponsors through direct and indirect remuneration or point-of sale rebates. In order to protect the beneficiary’s privacy, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) did not include information in cases where 10 or fewer prescriptions were dispensed.   Top Ten Drugs by Cost, 2014 [Most expensive for Medicare]    Drug Name Total Claim Count Beneficiary Count Prescriber Count Total Drug Cost Sofosbuvir 109,543 33,028 7,323 $3,106,589,192 Esomeprazole Magnesium 7,537,736 1,405,570 286,927 $2,660,052,054 Rosuvastatin Calcium 9,072,799 1,752,423 266,499 $2,543,475,142 Aripiprazole 2,963,457 405,048 130,933 $2,526,731,476 Fluticasone/Salmeterol 6,093,354 1,420,515 281,775 $2,276,060,161 Tiotropium Bromide 5,852,258 1,211,919 253,277 $2,158,219,163 Lantus Solostar (Insulin Glargine) 4,441,782 972,882 224,710 $2,016,728,436 Sitagliptin Phosphate 4,495,964 789,828 190,741 $1,775,094,282 Lantus (Insulin Glargine) 4,284,173 787,077 223,502 $1,725,391,907 Lenalidomide 178,373 27,142 9,337 $1,671,610,362 View the Medicare Part D National Prescriber Summary Report, Calendar Year 2014 (Excel version available) for FREE! Top Ten Drugs by Average Cost per Claim, 2014 [Most expensive drugs] Drug Name Total Claim Count Beneficiary Count Prescriber Count Total Drug Cost Average Cost Per Claim Adagen 13     $1,224,835 $94,218 Elaprase 100     $6,560,225 $65,602 Cinryze 1,820 194 196 $96,155,785 $52,833 Carbaglu 60     $2,901,115 $48,352 Naglazyme 129     $6,189,045 $47,977 Berinert 538 73 68 $25,685,311 $47,742 Firazyr 1,568 269 232 $70,948,143 $45,248 H.P. Acthar 9,611 2,932 1,621 $391,189,653 $40,702 Procysbi 314 41 47 $12,542,911 $39,946 Folotyn 15     $598,210 $39,881 Top Ten Drugs by Claims, 2014 [Most Commonly Used by Patients]   Generic Name Total Claim Count Beneficiary Count Prescriber Count Total Drug Cost Lisinopril 38,278,860 7,454,940 464,747 $281,614,340 Levothyroxine Sodium 37,711,869 6,245,507 416,518 $631,855,415 Amlodipine Besylate 36,344,166 6,750,062 451,350 $303,779,661 Simvastatin 34,092,548 6,768,159 387,651 $346,677,118 Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 33,446,696 8,005,790 677,865 $676,296,988 Omeprazole 33,032,770 6,707,964 475,122 $529,050,385 Atorvastatin Calcium 32,603,055 6,740,061 419,327 $747,635,818 Furosemide 27,133,430 5,176,582 456,047 $135,710,772 Metformin HCl 23,475,787 4,509,978 364,273 $203,948,989 Gabapentin 22,143,641 4,298,609 486,754 $492,557,255 View the Medicare Part D National Prescriber Summary Report, Calendar Year 2014 (Excel version available) for FREE! Top Ten Drugs by Prescribers, 2014 [Most Popular with Doctors]   Generic Name Total Claim Count Beneficiary Count Prescriber Count Total Drug Cost Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen 33,446,696 8,005,790 677,865 $676,296,988 Ciprofloxacin HCl 7,253,018 4,926,835 568,201 $46,728,353 Amoxicillin 6,298,980 4,384,899 557,614 $31,193,739 Cephalexin 5,040,219 3,529,303 557,048 $36,987,401 Azithromycin 7,339,954 5,274,010 544,625 $70,699,119 Prednisone 11,032,986 4,505,821 536,108 $86,537,932 Tramadol HCl 14,250,227 4,272,724 515,816 $125,343,514 Sulfamethoxazole /Trimethoprim 4,833,758 3,090,944 500,790 $29,231,511 Gabapentin 22,143,641 4,298,609 486,754 $492,557,255 Amoxicillin/Potassium Clav 3,551,452 2,710,244 478,361 $61,713,432 The findings from CMS data The CY 2014 data represented a 17 percent increase compared to the 2013 data set and a substantial part of the total estimated prescription drug spending (as estimated by the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, or ASPE) in the United States — at about US $ 457 billion in 2015, which was 16.7 percent of the overall personal healthcare services.  Of that US $ 457 billion, US $ 328 billion (71.9 percent) was for retail drugs and US $ 128 billion (28.1 percent) was for non-retail drugs. The drug pricing process in the US is complex and reflects the influence of numerous factors, including manufacturer list prices, confidential negotiated discounts and rebates, insurance plan benefit designs, and patient choices. An IMS study found that across 12 therapy classes widely used in Medicare Part D, medicine costs to plans and patients in Medicare Part D are 35 percent below list prices. View the Medicare Part D National Prescriber Summary Report, Calendar Year 2014 (Excel version available) for FREE! While the CMS does not currently have an established formulary, Part D drug coverage excludes drugs not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, those prescribed for off-label use, drugs not available by prescription for purchase in the US, and drugs for which payments would be available under Parts A or B of Medicare. Part D coverage excludes drugs or classes of drugs excluded from Medicaid coverage, such as: Drugs used for anorexia, weight loss, or weight gain Drugs used to promote fertility Drugs used for erectile dysfunction Drugs used for cosmetic purposes (hair growth, etc.) Drugs used for the symptomatic relief of cough and colds Prescription vitamins and mineral products, except prenatal vitamins and fluoride preparations Drugs where the manufacturer requires (as a condition of sale) any associated tests or monitoring services to be purchased exclusively from that manufacturer or its designee Our view The Medicare program is designed such that the federal government is not permitted to negotiate prices of drugs with the drug companies, as federal agencies do under other programs. For instance, the Department of Veterans Affairs — which is allowed to negotiate drug prices and establish a formulary — has been estimated to pay (on an average) between 40 to 58 percent less for drugs, as opposed to Medicare Part D. If Trump administration kick starts direct negotiations on Medicare drug prices with drug companies, 2017 will surely turn out to be a year for the pharmaceutical industry to remember.   View the Medicare Part D National Prescriber Summary Report, Calendar Year 2014 (Excel version available) for FREE!    

Impressions: 7907

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/drug-costs-and-prescription-trends-in-the-united-states-analyzing-medicare-s-121-billion-spend

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
05 Jan 2017
FDA’s Drug Approvals in 2015: Novel Drugs & New Versions of Existing Drugs
Each year, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approve hundreds of new medications. A small subset of approvals, classified as novel drugs, are considered to be truly innovative products that often help advance clinical care.  In 2015, the FDA approved 45 novel drugs, an all-time record high. PharmaCompass has compiled a list of novel drugs approved by the FDA in 2015.The FDA also approved new dosage forms of existing products in the market (email us if you would like a copy), like the 3D printed version of anti-epilepsy drug, Spritam (Levetiracetam).    This week, PharmaCompass focuses on the new dosage forms of existing drugs that got approved last year.   Modified blockbusters Improving the delivery form of a blockbuster drug is something that not only helps patients but often successfully extends the patent life of the cash-generating drugs for Big Pharma. Here are some blockbuster drugs that saw their modified versions being launched in 2015:  Jadenu (deferasirox): With almost a billion dollars in revenues in 2015, Exjade (deferasirox) was approved in 2005 as a tablet for use in a suspension. Novartis, the innovator, got approval in March 2015 for Jadenu, a once-daily oral tablet. Jadenu (deferasirox), a new formulation of Exjade, is the only once-daily oral tablet for iron chelation. Jadenu has simplified daily treatment administration for patients with chronic iron overload. Nexium 24HR (esomeprazole magnesium): Also known as the Purple Pill, Nexium – Astra Zeneca’s blockbuster drug for acid reflux that generated annual sales in America of more than US $ 3 billion – went  generic in 2015. In order to extend Nexium’s market, Pfizer and AstraZeneca came together to promote an over-the-counter (OTC) version of Nexium. A capsule version of OTC Nexium was approved in 2014 and is known as Nexium 24HR. Last year, the FDA granted approval to the tablet form of the drug.  Iressa (gefitinib): AstraZeneca re-introduced Iressa in the US market in 2015. The FDA had approved Gefitinib in May 2003 for non-small cell lung cancer. Approved as a third-line therapy, in 2010 the FDA requested AstraZeneca to voluntarily withdraw Iressa tablets from the market, as post-marketing studies had failed to verify and confirm clinical benefit. Iressa (gefitinib) is now back in the US as a first-line therapy for a type of lung cancer. However, the patent protection is limited – only one listed patent in the Orange Book which expires next year, and five US Drug Master Files already submitted. Onivyde (irinotecan): Liposomal formulation of anti-cancer drugs have been in vogue for some time. Merrimack Pharmaceuticals got its novel encapsulation of Irinotecan in a liposomal formulation approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, sold under the brand name Onivyde.  Vivlodex (meloxicam): In October 2015, the FDA approved 5 mg and 10 mg (administered once daily) doses of Vivlodex™ (meloxicam) capsules, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) used for the management of osteoarthritis pain. The previously approved doses for meloxicam capsules were 7.5mg and 15mg. Vivlodex uses a proprietary SoluMatrix Fine Particle Technology™, which contains meloxicam as submicron particles that are approximately 10 times smaller than their original size. The reduction in particle size provides an increased surface area, leading to faster dissolution.  Kalydeco (ivacaftor): A cystic fibrosis drug from Vertex Pharmaceuticals – Kalydeco – has been making headlines because of its high price (more than US $ 300,000 a year). Price concerns aside, 2015 saw the launch of a pediatric version of the drug as a ‘weight-based oral granule formulation of Kalydeco that can be mixed in soft foods or liquids’.   Extended release versions Many of the approvals granted by the FDA last year were to extended release formulations (a pill formulated so that the drug is released slowly) of existing drugs. Kremers Urban’s extended release version of Methylphenidate capsules made headlines last year because of a reclassification of the drug by the FDA. Under the new classification rating, methylphenidate hydrochloride extended-release tablets can be prescribed but may not be automatically substituted for J&J’s reference drug Concerta (methylphenidate hydrochloride). Kremers Urban was almost sold last year. But due to this reclassification, investors aborted their US $ 1.53 billion buyout. Kremers Urban was later acquired by Lannett Company Inc. In addition, extended-release versions of Aspirin, Carbidopa/Levodopa, Paliperidone Palmitate, Tacrolimus and Morphine Sulphate also received green signals for a market launch.   First generic opportunities Last year, PharmaCompass shared the names of some drugs which had no generic competition and were also not protected by patents. (Read: “Litigation Free, first generic opportunities list”). Deferiprone (a drug that chelates iron and is used to treat iron overload in thalassemia major) met the criteria. But it still has no generic competitor and is now available as a new dosage form. Amedra Pharmaceuticals, now owned by Impax Laboratories, has enjoyed the rights to sell Albendazole tablets for almost two decades without generic competition in the US. Albendazole is a medication used for the treatment of a variety of parasitic worm infestations. In 2015, patients were provided access to chewable tablets of Albendazole.   New combinations at work The FDA also approved multiple combination drugs where the individual active ingredients had been brought to market previously. Most of the combination drugs approved belong to major pharma players like Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Bristol Myers etc. Boehringer’s diabetes treatments – Jardiance (empagliflozin) – approved in 2014 and Tradjenta (linagliptin) approved in 2011, were combined and the combination drug product Glyxambi was approved in 2015. Another combination of empagliflozin, with metformin – Synjardy – was also approved in August last year. Lesser known companies also got combination drugs approved.  UK-based development company Vernalis got approval for its cold-cough treatment, Tuzistra XR – an extended release suspension of codeine polistirex and chlorpheniramine polistirex. Similarly, US-based biopharmaceutical startup, Spriaso LLC, also working in the cold and cough therapeutic area, got an extended release tablet containing codeine phosphate and chlorpheniramine maleate approved. Symplmed, a company which is developing various forms of Perindopril, got approval for Prestalia (a combination of perindopril arginine and amlodipine besylate) for the treatment of hypertension. Our view Each year, the FDA approves several pharmaceutical drugs in order to improve patient care; and often versions of these drugs are marketed and distributed across the globe. PharmaCompass’ list of drugs approved in 2015 is now available – just email us for your copy. Accelerate your drug development PharmaCompass has also launched the Drug Development Assistance tool on its platform. Simply search for the drug or the active ingredient of your interest, click on the Drug Development icon on the left menu bar and you can see the inactive ingredients used to formulate the various drug products approved in the United States.  

Impressions: 5404

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/fda-s-drug-approvals-in-2015-novel-drugs-new-versions-of-existing-drugs

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
14 Jan 2016
Will data integrity concerns on clinical trials done at GVK Biosciences go beyond Europe?
 Over 700 commonly used generic medicines were recommended for suspension by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) based on data integrity concerns, over clinical studies conducted at GVK Biosciences in Hyderabad, India.What will be the global fallout of the European decision? The European decision has impacted products from companies such as:Abbott Laboratories, Accord Healthcare (Intas), Actavis, Alembic, Apotex, Betapharm (Dr. Reddy’s), Brown & Burk UK, Fair Med Healthcare AG, Glenmark, Lupin, Micro Labs, Mylan, Orion Corporation, Ranbaxy, Ratiopharm, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, Stada, Teva, Torrent, Wockhardt, Zydus… and many, many more.The original recommendation of suspending some of the medicines made in January 2015, was an outcome of an inspection of GVK Biosciences’ site in Hyderabad (GVK BIO is a Clinical Research Organization- CRO) by the French medicines agency (ANSM) through the EMA. The EMA stated in their official release: “The inspection revealed data manipulations of electrocardiograms (ECGs) during the conduct of some studies of generic medicines, which appeared to have taken place over a period of at least five years. Their systematic nature, the extended period of time during which they took place and the number of members of staff involved cast doubt on the integrity of the conduct of trials at the site.” 1000 drugs reviewed// 700 rejectedWhile over 1,000 pharmaceutical forms and strengths were reviewed at the GVK site, over 300 of them had sufficient supporting data available from other sources. As a result, these medicines were allowed to remain on the market in the EU.However, for the over 700 other medicines, the EMA after its second review, maintained its previous recommendation of January 2015, to suspend medicines, where no additional supporting data from other studies was available. Only one exception after that second review was spared from suspension, as the company was able to address the EMA’s concerns: it was Bivolet Nebivolol (5 mg tablets/ marketing authorisation holder: Neo Balkanika EOOD).While the agency noted that “there is no evidence of harm or lack of effectiveness linked to the conduct of studies by GVK Biosciences at Hyderabad. Some of these medicines may remain on the market” if they are of critical importance for patients. However, the recommendation will now be sent to the European Commission for a legally binding decision, which will apply to Member States regardless of the decision taken in the interim period.The updated list of medicines for which, the CHMP (Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use) recommends suspension, is available on the EMA website. Companies are given 12 months to submit additional data. The potential global impact of the European suspensions?The GVK Biosciences scandal is almost as severe in magnitude and impact, as the data falsification concerns, which were discovered at Ranbaxy (Katherine Eban’s stunning investigation in Fortune, “Dirty Medicine” covers this extensively). One of the main promoters of GVK Biosciences is Mr. D.S. Brar who was CEO & Managing Director of Ranbaxy from 1999-2004. The impact of GVK Biosciences’ misdeeds is already being felt on new product launches. Mylan recently withdrew its European application for generic Abilify (aripiprazole) (2014 sales US$6.2x billion) citing “identification of major GCP issues (Good Clinical Practices).” What about the impact on the US market?In 2010, FDA discovered data integrity violations, which bankrupted clinical research organization, Cetero Research/PRACS. Based on the Cetero findings in the United States, the EMA suspended seven drugs. Now it remains to be seen, how the FDA will handle the data integrity concerns found in Europe since products like repaglinide & candesartan cilexitil (Mylan), levetiracetam (Dr. Reddy’s), clonazepam (Sandoz), metformin hydrochloride (Actavis), tacrolimus (Panacea Biotech) all have U.S. FDA approvals.  Leading GVK Biosciences’ defense is the Indian government, who warned last month that if the European Union does not reconsider their decision, it may go to the World Trade Organization. The Indian government’s position is based on an appeal by GVK Biosciences, which made the “Indian government set up a panel of experts last year to investigate the matter and found no manipulation”, GVK Biosciences CEO Manni Kantipudi told Reuters.However, globally reputed GMP expert, Lachman Consultants, believes that the GVK Bioscience episode “could potentially impact data integrity, similar to the Cetero/PRACS case”.It’s clear for us that this is not the end of the story… 

Impressions: 4047

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/will-data-integrity-concerns-on-clinical-trials-done-at-gvk-biosciences-go-beyond-europe

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
28 May 2015
Dr. Reddy’s expansion plans for API production
Unrelated to the inspection of the USFDA at the Dr. Reddys Srikakulam facility, Dr. Reddys sought permission from the Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change to expand their drug and intermediate manufacturing at three locations. All three chemical technical operation (CTO) units, CTO-I, CTO-II & CTO-III are located in Medak district and the announced planned capacity increases along with the anticipated capital investment were   Existing Capacity Planned Capacity Anticipated Investment CTO I 14.7 TPM 45.5 TPM Rs 30 crores CTO II 21.9 TPM 68.9 TPM Rs 45 crores CTO - III 4.45 TPM 28.1 TPM Rs 12 crores  *$1 million is approximately about Rs 6.2 crores & TPM is tons per month In addition, the declaration given by Dr. Reddys also mentions the various products which will be produced at each facility (table below). Needless to say, the plans are ambitious however with the growth witnessed by the Indian pharmaceutical industry over the past decade, one can understand Dr. Reddys commitment to investing further in their business.   Table Dr. Reddys production plans at various facilities Product Name Planned Capacity (TPM) Facility Location Alendronate Sodium Trihydrate 6.67 CTO - III Alfuzosin 2.33 CTO - I Altretamine 0.03 CTO - I Amlodipine Besylate 33.33 CTO - II Amlodipine Besylate 133.33 CTO - III Amlodipine Besylate ( Ethyl 4 [2- (pthalamide)ethoxy] aceto acetate (TDM-2) 100 CTO - II Amlodipine Maleate 30 CTO - III Amsacrine 0.07 CTO - I Anastrazole 0.83 CTO - II Aprepitant 3.33 CTO - III Aripiprazole 0.33 CTO - II Atomoxetine 1.67 CTO - III Atorvastatin  375.83 CTO - II Azacitidine 0.67 CTO - I Bicalutamide 0.03 CTO - II Bivalirudin 0.03 CTO - II Bivalirudin Trifluoro Acetate 0.03 CTO - I Bortezomib 0.03 CTO - I Cabazitaxel 0.02 CTO - I Candesartan cilexetil 6.67 CTO - II Cetirizine Hydrochloride 66.67 CTO - I  Cetirizine 16.67 CTO - II Ciprofloxacin 176.67 CTO - II Ciprofloxacin HCl  533.33 CTO - II Ciprofloxacin Lactate 33.33 CTO - II Clopidogrel Bisulfate 500 CTO - I Clopidogrel Premix 166.67 CTO - II Diluted Everolimus 5% (Everolimus) 0.33 CTO - II Disodium Pamidronate 0.33 CTO - III Docetaxel 1.9 CTO - I Dutasteride 3.33 CTO - II Esomeprazole magnesium 66.67 CTO - III Ezetimibe 3.33 CTO - II Fexofenadine Hydrochloride  500 CTO - I Finasteride 10 CTO - II Fluoxetine 110 CTO - I Fondaparinux Sodium 0.33 CTO - II Galantamine 0.03 CTO - II Gemcitabine 13.33 CTO - I Glimepiride 13.33 CTO - II Imatinib 0.17 CTO - I Irinotecan 0.33 CTO - I Ketorolac 66.67 CTO - II Lacidipine 5 CTO - III Lamotrigine 33.33 CTO - I Lansoprozole 8.33 CTO - III Letrozole 0.03 CTO - II Levocetrizine Di HCl 10 CTO - III Levofloxacin 200 CTO - II Lomustine 1.33 CTO - I Losartan Postassium 150 CTO - I Meloxicam 0.03 CTO - I Memantine HCl 3.33 CTO - II Mesalamine 0.03 CTO - II Metoprolol Succinate 266.67 CTO - II Moxifloxacin 116.67 CTO - II Norfloxacin  0.03 CTO - I Omeprazole 133.33 CTO - III Omeprazole Magnesium 50 CTO - III Omeprazole Sodium 10 CTO - III Omerprazole Form B 33.33 CTO - III Paclitaxel 0.33 CTO - I Pantoprazole Sodium 100 CTO - III paroxetine HCl 0.03 CTO - II Pemetrexed 0.67 CTO - I Rabeprazole Sodium 83.33 CTO - III Raloxifene 33.33 CTO - II Ramipril 100 CTO - III Repaglinide 6.67 CTO - II Rivastigmine 6.67 CTO - II Risperidone 13.33 CTO - I Rivastigmine 6.667 CTO - I Rizatriptan Benzoate 1.33 CTO - II Rocuronium Bromide 0.03 CTO - II Ropinrole HCl 1.83 CTO - III Rosiglitazone 3.33 CTO - II Sparfloxacin 3.33 CTO - I Tacrolimus 5 CTO - II Tadalafil 3.33 CTO - II Telmisartan 100 CTO - II Temozolamide 0.03 CTO - I Terbinafine HCl 133.33 CTO - III Tizanidine HCl 16.67 CTO - III Topotecan 0.07 CTO - I valganciclovir 0.03 CTO - I Vardenafil 3.33 CTO - II Voriconazole 8.33 CTO - III Ziprasidone Hydrochloride 100 CTO - I Zoledronic acid 0.33 CTO - III Zolmitriptan 0.83 CTO - I Zonisamide 0.03 CTO - II

Impressions: 3073

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/dr-reddy-s-expansion-plans-for-api-production

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
03 Apr 2015