Please Wait
Applying Filters...
Menu
Xls

Digital Content read-more

Create Content with PharmaCompass, ask us

DATA COMPILATION #PharmaFlow

read-more
read-more
CEP Q1 2026 Update: CEP 2.0, EDQM’s new guidelines strengthen ecosystem; Indian firms top list of CEPs issued
PharmaCompass is introducing a new regulatory update that tracks developments in Certificates of Suitability to the Monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia, referred to as CEPs. These certificates are a critical regulatory instrument in the global pharmaceutical supply chain.Also known as a Certification of Suitability (COS), CEPs are issued by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare (EDQM), with or without inspection of the manufacturing site. A CEP must be renewed every five years from its original issue date to remain valid, regardless of any revisions made during the interim period. However, a CEP does not replace Good Manufacturing Practice certification.CEPs are recognized as a trusted reference for API quality, thereby simplifying global registration strategies. Apart from Europe, the CEP system is widely used by many regulatory authorities, including those in Canada, Australia, Brazil, Singapore and South Africa. View CEPs Issued in Q1 2026 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available)CEP 2.0 enhances regulatory clarity, brings efficiency, global interoperability There are several types of CEPs, depending on the nature of the substance and evaluation. The most common type is the Chemical CEP, which confirms that a chemically synthesized API meets standards for purity and impurity control. Then there are Herbal CEPs for herbal substances and preparations.Another key category is the TSE CEP, which addresses risks associated with transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in animal-derived materials. In addition, there are Combined CEPs that may cover multiple aspects, such as chemical quality, TSE risk, and sterility. However, biological products such as vaccines and blood products fall outside the scope of the CEP framework.In 2023, the CEP system underwent a major transformation with the introduction of CEP 2.0, which marks a shift from a largely document-based system to a more structured, transparent, and digitally aligned model. This makes it easier for companies to manage compliance while improving trust among global regulators.While increasing data and compliance requirements for API manufacturers, CEP 2.0 enables better regulatory clarity, streamlined dossier integration, and stronger global acceptance. Overall, CEP 2.0 is designed to enhance regulatory clarity while making the system more efficient and globally interoperable. View CEPs Issued in Q1 2026 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available)Indian firms issued maximum CEPs; Sun Pharma and its subsidiaries, Jubilant Biosys top listIndia topped the charts for CEPs issued, both in terms of new CEPs and revisions in the first quarter (Q1) of 2026. Indian companies were issued 81 new CEPs in Q1 2026 (as against 40 in Q1 2025) and 203 revisions (as against 129 in Q1 2025). In comparison, Chinese companies were issued 42 new CEPs in Q1 2026 (against 25 in Q1 2025) and 53 revisions (against 67 in Q1 2025). Italy came a distant third, followed by Germany and Spain.India’s Sun Pharmaceuticals and its subsidiaries topped the list of companies with the maximum number of CEPs issued— while no new CEP was issued, 27 CEPs were revised in Q1 2026. At second place was Jubilant Biosys — 21 CEPs were revised in Q1 2026.In terms of products, the maximum CEPs were issued for amlodipine besylate (a calcium channel blocker used for treating hypertension), followed by sitagliptin phosphate (a type 2 diabetes medicine) and pregabalin (a drug used to treat neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, seizures, and generalized anxiety disorder). Both amlodipine besylate and sitagliptin phosphate had not been issued new CEPs or revisions in Q1 2025. View CEPs Issued in Q1 2026 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available)EDQM introduces new guidelines to accelerate CEP assessments The EDQM charges fees for various services related to CEPs that depend on the type of request or regulatory activity involved. In general, fees apply to handling CEP applications, revisions or renewals and for offering technical advice (where applicants seek scientific or regulatory guidance).In March 2026, the EDQM introduced two new guidelines aimed at accelerating CEP assessments. The first is a reliance-based assessment pathway, which allows regulators to leverage prior approvals from trusted authorities, such as those in the EU, UK, Australia, Canada, and the WHO pre-qualification program. The second is a fast-track assessment route designed to expedite reviews in situations such as medicine shortages and to support initiatives like the EU Critical Medicines Act.Timelines have been significantly compressed under these new pathways. Initial evaluations are completed within 46 working days, compared to up to 115 days under the standard procedure. Applicants are given 30 calendar days to respond to queries, after which regulators complete the final assessment within 23 working days.Another important regulatory update relates to electronic submissions. From April 1, 2026, the EDQM will reject non-compliant CEP applications at the point of submission. All applications must include a validated electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) dossier along with a proper validation report, submitted in line with the updated Common European Submission Portal (CESP) guidelines. Taken together, these developments signal a more rigorous yet efficient CEP ecosystem. View CEPs Issued in Q1 2026 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available)Our viewThe shift to CEP 2.0 signals a move toward greater transparency, digitalization, and global regulatory alignment. Though enhanced disclosure and stricter e-submission requirements may increase the compliance burden, especially for smaller manufacturers, the long-term gains are expected to be significant. Going forward, companies that invest in data quality and regulatory readiness stand to gain from these changes.

Impressions: 2594

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/cep-q1-2026-update-cep-2-0-edqm-s-new-guidelines-strengthen-ecosystem-indian-firms-top-list-of-ceps-issued

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
09 Apr 2026

WEEKLY NEWS RECAP #Phispers

read-more
read-more
FDA highlights data-integrity concerns at Pfizer’s India unit; FDA requests removal of all ranitidine products
This week, N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) is back in news as the FDA requests manufacturers to withdraw ranitidine from the market immediately due to the presence of the cancer-causing impurity. Bristol Myers bagged FDA approval for its multiple sclerosis treatment Zeposia. However, its launch would be delayed due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. In an unusual turn of events, Chinese officials have suspended the import of Bristol Myers’ cancer drug Abraxane, post inspection of the company’s facility in the US. Meanwhile, the FDA found data integrity concerns at Pfizer’s site in Visakhapatnam (India) and issued it a warning letter. The merger of Mylan with Upjohn (Pfizer’s off-patent branded and generic business) has been postponed until the second half of 2020 due to Covid-19. And Indian drugmaker Sun Pharma’s plant in Halol (Gujarat) got classified as OAI by the FDA. FDA highlights data-integrity concerns at Pfizer’s India unit; Mylan-Upjohn merger delayed   Last year, when the mega-merger of Mylan with Upjohn (Pfizer’s off-patent branded and generic established medicines business) was announced, PharmaCompass had highlighted how compliance would play a key role in determining the merger’s success. This week, Pfizer’s sterile manufacturing operations in India received a warning letter from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The site, located in Visakhapatnam (Andhra Pradesh, India), was inspected from August 29 to September 6, 2019. The warning letter highlights that Pfizer’s operations failed to conduct adequate investigations, including timely implementation of effective corrective action and preventive action (CAPA) plans. There was a failure to adequately investigate serious deficiencies in microbiology laboratory conditions and practices as microbial results were invalidated without adequate scientific justification. Laboratory data accuracy deficiencies were also cited by the FDA in a previous September 2018 inspection. As a result, the FDA recommended data-integrity remediation plans as it believed the site’s quality system did not adequately ensure the accuracy and integrity of data to support the safety, effectiveness and quality of the drugs that were being manufactured. The Visakhapatnam operation was acquired by Pfizer in February 2015, as part of its US$ 17 billion acquisition of Hospira. When the deal was struck, Pfizer was aware of Hospira’s manufacturing record as the company was issued FDA warning letters in four out of seven continents (Europe, North America, Asia and Australia). The executives of Pfizer had assured investors and regulators that they would quickly resolve issues at the plants. In January 2019, Pfizer went on to announce that two manufacturing sites in India, which were part of the Hospira acquisition, will cease manufacturing operations. At the time of the announcement, the sites located near Chennai (Irungattukottai) and Aurangabad employed 1,700 people.  The FDA warning letter for the operations at the Irungattukottai site stated that the agency had found the site’s microbiology laboratory was inaccurately reporting test results. Pfizer-Mylan merger delayed: The merger of Pfizer’s Upjohn unit and Mylan has been postponed until the second half of 2020. With the ongoing novel coronavirus pandemic, US regulators have warned that major corporate transaction reviews could be held up. In a statement, Mylan said the merger has been delayed due to “unprecedented circumstances surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic, including associated delays in the regulatory review process.” “The two companies remain highly confident in the benefits of the pending transaction to their respective shareholders and other stakeholders,” the statement added. The Upjohn-Mylan deal delay is the first instance of pharma pushing merger deadlines in response to the ongoing novel coronavirus pandemic. End of ranitidine? FDA requests removal of all product from market   Cancer-causing impurity N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) is back in the news. In a statement issued this week, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said it had found levels of the cancer-causing impurity NDMA in ranitidine increase over time. And when stored at higher room temperatures, it may result in consumer exposure to unacceptable levels of this impurity. As a result of this finding, the FDA has requested manufacturers to withdraw all prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) ranitidine drugs from the market immediately. Ranitidine is a widely used heartburn medication and is commonly known by the brand name Zantac. The drug is currently sold by French drugmaker Sanofi in the US and Canada after it acquired the drug from Boehringer in 2016. The trigger for the NDMA concerns in ranitidine was a citizen petition filed on behalf of an online pharmacy — Valisure — on September 9, 2019. The petition stated that while the FDA had established a permissible daily intake limit for the probable human carcinogen —  NDMA — of 96 nanograms (ng), Valisure had detected NDMA in excess of 3,000,000 ng per tablet when it analyzed ranitidine products, likely due to an inherent instability of the ranitidine molecule. The molecule contains both a nitrite and a dimethylamine (“DMA”) group, which is known to combine to form NDMA. Post the Valisure finding, many leading brand and generic manufacturers recalled their ranitidine drug products globally. The FDA tested numerous ranitidine tablets on the market over the past few months and released a summary of the results on November 1, 2019. The agency had indicated that if the NDMA levels were found to be above acceptable limits (96 ng per day or 0.32 ppm), they would ask companies to recall Ranitidine products voluntarily. There were companies like Strides Pharma Science in India that went on to re-launch their ranitidine tablets in the US as they stated that the level of NDMA in their product was found to be within acceptable limits. Valisure’s petition also tested other commonly used antacids for NDMA levels and detected elevated levels in another antacid containing nizatidine (sold under the brand name Axid). In order to provide patients with other treatment options, the FDA stated that to date, the FDA’s testing has not found NDMA in famotidine (Pepcid), cimetidine (Tagamet), esomeprazole (Nexium), lansoprazole (Prevacid) or omeprazole (Prilosec). Bristol Myers’ ozanimod bags FDA nod for MS, though Covid-19 delays its launch   Covid-19 is delaying drug launches. Last week, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) said the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved its multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment — Zeposia (ozanimod). However, the launch of the drug would be delayed due to the coronavirus outbreak. The drug was added to BMS’s portfolio through its US$ 74 billion acquisition of Celgene last year. Its approval was one of the three conditions set for a potentially higher payout for Celgene investors. Despite the expectant delay, the approval brings the company into a highly lucrative MS market where rivals have recorded blockbuster sales. For instance, Novartis AG’s Gilenya brought in sales of over US$ 2 billion in 2019. Novartis’ new MS treatment, Mayzent, recorded sales of US$ 17 million in the first quarter of its launch. The FDA nod comes at a time when sales of BMS’s blockbuster cancer drug Opdivo have slowed under pressure from Merck’s Keytruda. “With the FDA approval of Zeposia, appropriate patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis will have another oral treatment option with meaningful efficacy to help address the disease’s hallmark relapses and brain lesions,” said Samit Hirawat, chief medical officer, BMS. Analysts have high hopes from ozanimod. Its average peak sales for 2024 have been predicted to be at US$ 1.62 billion by Cortellis, though the Covid-19 pandemic may weigh in there as well. Chinese regulator suspends import of Bristol Myers’ blockbuster product from US   It’s usually the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency (EMA) that cites irregularities with drug companies overseas. In a rare event, Beijing-headquartered biopharmaceutical company BeiGene said it is being forced by Chinese officials to halt imports of the cancer drug Abraxane. According to BeiGene, the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) has ordered the halt following an inspection of one of Bristol Myers Squibb’s (BMS) facilities in the US that is used to manufacture the drug. The details of the inspection and the lapses on part of BMS are not known. However, BeiGene said it is trying to find another supplier for the drug, which it licensed from Celgene, as they try to resolve the issues raised by Chinese inspectors. Over the recent past, we have seen the US-China relations plummet with the US President Donald Trump putting pressure on China to make some fundamental changes in the way they handle exports to the US. “A recent inspection of the Chinese governmental body at a third-party manufacturing site that produces Abraxane for the China market identified opportunities for improvement. We are working closely with the Chinese health authorities and the manufacturing site to implement corrective actions and preventive measures to address their findings,” a BMS spokesperson said. Celgene, which is now a BMS company, entered into an exclusive license and supply agreement with BeiGene for Abraxane and two other cancer medicines in China in 2017 as part of a broader strategic collaboration. The drug had brought in sales of US$ 1.2 billion for BMS in 2019. “As the marketing agent for Abraxane in China, we are extremely disappointed by this interruption in drug supply,” John V Oyler, chairman, co-founder and CEO of BeiGene said. Sun Pharma’s Halol facility gets classified as OAI   The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has classified Indian drugmaker Sun Pharmaceutical’s Halol facility in Gujarat as Official Action Indicated (OAI). Sun Pharma is the world’s fourth largest specialty generic pharmaceutical company and India’s largest drug firm. OAI implies that pending product approval from the facility could be withheld by the regulator. Earlier in December, the plant had been issued a Form 483 by the FDA with eight observations. This has escalated into an OAI classification. According to Sun Pharma, the OAI classification implies that the FDA may withhold approval of any pending product applications or supplements filed from this facility till the outstanding observations are resolved. There are 19 abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) and two new drug applications (NDAs), which were filed from the Halol facility, currently awaiting approval for the US market. The company continues to manufacture and distribute existing products for the US market. Therefore, it is not likely to have any adverse impact on the current business from the facility. As of now, US supplies from Halol contribute approximately three to four percent of the company's consolidated revenues. In December, the company had said that it had been issued a Form 483 by the FDA with eight observations, post an inspection conducted by the agency at its Halol facility from December 3 to 13, 2019. The Form 483 had highlighted that Sun “failed to establish and implement controls which ensure data integrity” in the use of the environmental monitoring computerized system used in its microbiology laboratory for all samples including those that are used to establish a sterile manufacturing environment.  Sun Pharma has said it continues to cooperate with the FDA and will undertake all necessary steps to resolve these issues and to ensure that the regulator is completely satisfied with its remedial action.  

Impressions: 3650

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-phisper/fda-highlights-data-integrity-concerns-at-pfizer-s-india-unit-fda-requests-removal-of-all-ranitidine-products

#Phispers by PHARMACOMPASS
02 Apr 2020

NEWS #PharmaBuzz

read-more
read-more

https://www.indianpharmapost.com/drug-approval/alembic-announces-fda-final-approval-for-fingolimod-capsules-19931

INDPHARMAPOST
27 Apr 2026

https://www.expresspharma.in/alembic-pharmaceuticals-receives-usfda-approval-for-fingolimod-capsules-anda/

EXPRESSPHARMA
27 Apr 2026

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=207974

FDA
24 Apr 2026

https://www.pharmacompass.com/pdf/news/enforcement-report-week-of-july-26-2023-55742.pdf

FDA
26 Jul 2023

https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-rebuffs-novartis-bid-revive-ms-drug-gilenya-patent-2023-04-17/

REUTERS
18 Apr 2023
Vyne swings behind BET, seeks partner for failed eczema drug
Vyne swings behind BET, seeks partner for failed eczema drug

10 Mar 2023

// Nick Paul Taylor FIERCE BIOTECH

https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/vyne-swings-behind-bet-inhibitors-seeks-partner-failed-eczema-drug

Nick Paul Taylor FIERCE BIOTECH
10 Mar 2023