Oxymorphone Hydrochloride
Mylan’s President, Emcure’s CEO named in US drug price-fixing probe; Novartis buys French biotech for US$ 3.9 billion
This week in Phispers, we look at how Mylan’s president Rajiv Malik and Emcure’s CEO Satish Mehta, along with 12 major generic drug players, got added to an expanded investigation into the drug price-fixing case in the US. While Trump declared the opioid crisis a health emergency, pharma companies Celgene and Gilead saw their third quarter results and guidance get impacted by a drug trial failure and competition. Meanwhile, there was news on Novartis buying AAA, CVS Health showing interest in buying health insurer Aetna and Merck cutting jobs and withdrawing its application for Keytruda as treatment for advanced lung cancer. Mylan’s president, Emcure’s CEO, 12 firms to be probed in price-fixing case   This week, attorneys general from 45 US states named Mylan’s president Rajiv Malik and Emcure’s billionaire CEO Satish Mehta as they expanded their three-year old investigation into price-fixing in the generic pharmaceuticals industry. In addition to the two individuals, 12 major generic drug companies and 13 drugs were added to the expanded investigation. This week’s filing alleges collusion of 18 defendant companies, as well as two individual executives, involving a total of 15 drugs.  (To view the complete list of companies and drugs, click here) The states allege multiple conspiracies that restrained trade, artificially inflated and/or maintained prices and reduced competition in the generic drug industry. According to the expanded complaint, Mehta and Malik were “directly involved in conceiving an illegal agreement and taking affirmative steps to ensure it was executed by their subordinates.” Earlier this year, a federal criminal investigation resulted in the convictions of former Heritage Pharmaceuticals CEO Jeffrey Glazer and former Heritage President Jason Malek. Heritage is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Emcure. Both Glazer and Malek pleaded guilty and have been cooperating in the anti-trust investigations being conducted by federal and state prosecutors. PharmaCompass had covered the illegal practices at Heritage Pharmaceuticals that had come to light when Emcure had filed a lawsuit against Glazer. It now remains to be seen if Glazer acted on his own or colluded with his bosses in India to fix generic drug prices in the United States. As Trump declares opioid crisis an emergency, Insys founder gets arrested   Last week, the US President Donald Trump hardened his stand on the opioid crisis, blaming it on factors like criminals, drug companies, Mexico and China. In the US, the crisis claimed over 30,000 lives in 2015. He termed abuse of opioids a public health emergency and outlined steps to fight it — such as new efforts to curb prescription abuse, reduction in import of certain drugs and educating children on the risks. “We must stop the flow of all types of illegal drugs into our communities,” Trump said. Blaming pharmaceutical companies for over-prescribing pain medications, he said the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will provide more training to doctors who prescribe drugs to prevent abuse. Moreover, he has requested that one opioid drug, Opana ER, no longer be sold. According to Trump, a border wall with Mexico will “greatly help” reduce this problem. He also talked about China’s role in the production of fentanyl. Meanwhile, John Kapoor, the founder of Insys Therapeutics, was arrested last week on charges of participating in a scheme to bribe doctors to prescribe a fentanyl-based cancer pain drug. Kapoor has resigned from the company’s board of directors, and his arrest is being seen as a step towards fighting the opioid epidemic. The charges against Kapoor marked a major escalation of probes into Subsys, an under-the-tongue spray that contains fentanyl, an addictive synthetic opioid. Celgene’s Crohn’s disease drug fails trial; Gilead reports weak Hep C sales   Two companies have not had a good going — Celgene and Gilead. The former announced that its drug mongersen — a potential treatment for Crohn’s disease — had failed. Celgene had purchased the drug four years ago for US$ 710 million from a private company in Dublin — Nogra Pharma Limited. The New Jersey-headquartered biotech firm had promised that if mongersen gets approved, Nogra would get another US$ 815 million. But that was not to be. What was worse, Celgene’s third-quarter financial announced last week spooked its investors. The company missed analysts’ sales projections for the third quarter by 4 percent, cut its guidance for 2020 by 5 to 10 percent, and announced that sales of a key (plaque psoriasis) drug — Otezla — had missed forecasts by US$ 100 million. In a note, Geoffrey Porges, a biotech analyst at Leerink, said: “Investors are likely to ask whether the company’s good fortune has run out, with disappointments (mongersen) and negative revisions (Otezla) left and right.” Gilead, on the other hand, is trying hard to move away from hepatitis C. Its hepatitis C drugs generated US$ 2 billion during the last quarter — just US$ 300 million short of Wall Street’s projections. However, investors were cautioned about AbbVie’s new launch —Mavyret — which is expected to have a “big impact” on Gilead’s fourth-quarter results. Gilead’s hepatitis C drugs have been facing competition from new rivals who have eaten into its market share and driven down prices over the last few quarters. However, we could expect some M&A action soon. “Gilead noted that it is in a ‘constant state of valuation and opportunities’ and that it is very, very active,” said an analyst. Novartis buys radiopharmaceutical firm AAA for US$ 3.9 billion   In July, PharmaCompass had covered news on how Lutathera — a nuclear medicine targeted at the type of cancer that killed former Apple Inc co-founder and CEO Steve Jobs — got a nod from the European Medicines Agency (EMA), boosting prospects for its developer Advanced Accelerator Applications (AAA). Well, last week the French biotech — AAA — got bought over by Novartis for US$ 3.9 billion. Novartis is paying a 44 percent premium over AAA’s market valuation from September 28. The deal further strengthens Novartis’ oncology business, which had got a shot in the arm in 2015, when it acquired GlaxoSmithKline’s marketed cancer drugs. And in August, its gene-modifying leukemia treatment (a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy or CAR-T therapy) — Kymriah — got approved. This was the first CAR-T therapy to bag an FDA approval. With AAA, Novartis will now have a technology that deploys trace amounts of radioactive compounds to not only diagnose a disease (by creating images of organs and lesions), but also to fight cancer. Lutathera is a radiopharmaceutical — it uses radioisotopes to target neuroendocrine tumors. Along with Lutathera, Novartis also gets a pipeline of drugs from AAA with some near-term potential.  US Merck to cut 1,800 jobs, withdraws EU application of cancer wonder drug   Late last week, Merck announced it had withdrawn its application for Keytruda (pembrolizumab) as a combination treatment for an advanced stage of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the European Medicines Agency (EMA). An analyst with Evercore ISI, Umer Raffat, said in a note that EMA was reluctant to approve drugs based on Phase II data, even though the FDA regularly does so in oncology. The company is also moving to a new sales team structure in the US, and plans to cut 1,800 sales positions, while adding 960 jobs to a new chronic care salesforce. According to a Fox Business report, three of Merck’s US sales teams will be cut: primary care, disease-focused endocrinology and hospital chronic care. This is “to better support changes in our business in the United States,” Merck’s spokeswoman said. Merck’s new chronic care team will focus on Januvia (a diabetes drug), other primary care products such as sleep medication Belsomra, and products for respiratory conditions and women's health, she added. Releasing its third quarter numbers in the US, Merck was also forced to concede that the NotPetya cyber attack had cost the company US$ 135 million in lost sales along with US$ 175 million in related costs. That extra US$ 310 million in costs will be repeated in Q4 as overall damages inch up to the US$ 1 billion mark, the company said. As Amazon threat looms over US pharmacy biz, CVS eyes health insurer Aetna   Amazon has been trying to get into the US$ 412 billion pharmacy business in the US. Every year, pharmacies in the US dispense about 4.5 billion prescriptions. Patients pick up about 9 out of 10 prescriptions at a retail pharmacy. Amazon’s entry into online prescription drug sales, therefore, poses an existential threat to brick-and-mortar pharmacies. And that’s the reason why news about US pharmacy operator CVS Health Corp reportedly evincing interest in buying health insurer Aetna Inc is important. This potential acquisition could trigger another round of deal making in an industry that is fearing Amazon’s arrival. According to news reports, CVS Health is expected to buy Aetna for US$ 66 billion in what would be the biggest deal of the year. If the deal goes through, it would also be the biggest of its kind ever in healthcare. “A potential combination would diversify CVS profit streams ahead of an Amazon entry and set the stage for a new healthcare-retail delivery model,” Morgan Stanley analysts wrote in a note. A deal would make CVS-Aetna a one-stop shop for customers’ healthcare needs — which could range from employer healthcare and government plans to managing benefits and running drug stores.  

Impressions: 3103

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/mylan-s-president-emcure-s-ceo-named-in-us-drug-price-fixing-probe-novartis-buys-french-biotech-for-us-3-9-billion

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
02 Nov 2017
J&J’s diabetes drug reduces heart risk at the cost of toes; Google’s AI eye doctor initiative
This week in Phispers, we bring you news on J&J’s Invokana, a drug that reduces heart risk while increasing the risk of amputation of toes. There is news from Google, which is tying up with India’s Aravind Eye Care System for its artificial intelligence eye doctor initiative. And WHO takes a step towards reducing antibiotic resistance by grouping antibiotics into ‘Access’, ‘Watch’ and ‘Reserve’.  Manufacturing errors trigger drug recalls by Lupin and Dr. Reddy’s in the US   Earlier this month, we carried an article on the end of India’s pharma honeymoon. News this week from Lupin and Cipla added another dimension to the problem as manufacturing errors triggered drug recalls in the United States. Lupin voluntarily recalled a lot of its birth control pills — Mibelas 24 Fe — in the US. A market complaint indicated a packaging error, making the lot number and expiration date no longer visible. This product is an oral contraceptive for women. As a result of the packaging error, the FDA says the first four days of the birth control packet have four non-hormonal placebo tablets as opposed to the active tablets. This may place the user at risk for contraceptive failure and unintended pregnancy. Similarly, Dr. Reddy’s had to recall hundreds of thousands of cartons of a popular acne medicine — Zenatane — manufactured by Cipla’s plant in Pune. According to FDA enforcement reports, Dr. Reddy’s is recalling 190 lots, consisting of 778,279 cartons of its Zenatane brand isotretinoin capsules, in four dose sizes. The voluntary Class II recall was initiated in late May after the products failed dissolution testing. During this period of turmoil, the Indian company which is generating a lot of positive press is Cadila Healthcare. Cadila’s US division Zydus Pharmaceuticals’ subsidiary Nesher Pharmaceuticals has received final FDA approval to market Nystatin Topical Powder, an anti-fungal antibiotic used to treat skin infections caused by yeast. There is more good news from Zydus Cadila. After years of patent battles, the FDA has approved Zydus Cadila’s generic version of Shire’s ulcerative colitis drug Lialda. This came as a rude shock to Shire investors who had believed the US$ 800 million drug was safe for a few more years. However, there is a chance that instead of a flood of generics, the Zydus' generic may be the only competition for Lialda for sometime. Zydus Cadilla has indicated that its version will have a six-month exclusivity. J&J’s diabetes drug saves heart at the cost of toes; Sanofi’s insulin slashes hypoglycemia risks for seniors   Would you like to sacrifice your toes to save yourself from a heart attack? Well, a diabetes drug made by Johnson & Johnson (J&J), does just that. The drug — Invokana — decreases the risk of heart attacks and strokes, while increasing the risk of amputation, particularly of toes. According to the results of the 10,142-patient study, funded by J&J, for every three heart attacks, strokes, or cardiovascular deaths prevented by Invokana, there were two amputations, 71 percent of them of toes or the lower foot. While this is a setback to J&J, its rivals — Eli Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim — who make a similar drug called Jardiance, may be cheering the findings of this study, performed on sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. These drugs prevent the kidney from absorbing sugar from the blood. But scientists are not sure why the drugs would prevent cardiovascular disease, and it’s unclear why one of them would lead to amputations. “It justifies the need to test each medicine,” Harlan Krumholz of Yale University said. Another study examining an at-risk population of seniors who had switched to basal insulin found Sanofi’s Toujeo to outdo its peers at cutting the risk of hypoglycemia in older patients. During a six-month follow-up, the study found that amongst the ‘at-risk’ seniors, those taking Toujeo were 57 percent less likely to experience hypoglycemia than those who switched to competing insulins—such as Novo Nordisk’s Tresiba and Levemir, and Toujeo’s predecessor, Lantus. Google ties up with Indian hospital chain for artificial intelligence eye doctor initiative   Google will soon begin work on a grand experiment that would use machines to widen access of healthcare. If successful, this initiative will protect millions of diabetes patients from an eye disease that leads to blindness. Last year, researchers at Google had said they had trained image recognition algorithms to detect signs of diabetic retinopathy roughly as accurately as human experts. Left untreated, diabetic retinopathy causes blindness. The software examines photos of a patient’s retina to spot tiny aneurisms that would help detect early stages of the disease. Google is working with the Aravind Eye Care System in India, a network of eye hospitals, in order to integrate this technology. “This kind of blindness is completely preventable, but because people can’t get screened, half suffer vision loss before they’re detected,” Lily Peng, a product manager with the Google Brain AI research group, said. “One of the promises of this technology is being able to make healthcare more accessible.” There are more than 400 million people worldwide with diabetes, including 70 million in India. FDA tells Endo to pull out its opioid pain medication, as Gottlieb attacks addiction   Last week, the US FDA asked drugmaker Endo Pharmaceuticals to remove its powerful opioid pain medication — Opana ER — from the market, due to “the public health consequences of abuse”. “We are facing an opioid epidemic — a public health crisis — and we must take all necessary steps to reduce the scope of opioid misuse and abuse,” FDA Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb said. “We will continue to take regulatory steps when we see situations where an opioid product’s risks outweigh its benefits, not only for its intended patient population but also in regard to its potential for misuse and abuse,” he added. Opioid overdoses killed 33,000 Americans in 2015, with half of those involving a prescription opioid. Opana ER, which is oxymorphone hydrochloride, is used to manage severe pain. The FDA approved it for this use in 2006. The drug is about twice as powerful as OxyContin, another often abused opioid. In 2012, Endo reformulated the drug to make it more resistant to physical and chemical tampering. While the drug met the standards for approval, FDA says Endo never showed that the reformulation would reduce abuse. Amgen loses bid to delay Novartis’ biosimilar; FDA rejects Coherus’ biosimilar for Neulasta    Amgen lost a case in the Supreme Court of the United States that sought to delay biosimilars of its rivals. Amgen had argued that its biosimilar rivals should be forced to delay their 180-day marketing notices until the FDA had made up its mind on the marketing application. However, on Monday, the Supreme Court took a decision by determining that the law never imposed a two-tier timing system for these notices. Therefore “the applicant may provide notice either before or after receiving FDA approval.” This has proven to be a clear win for Sandoz — the generic unit of Novartis that is fielding an array of copycat biologics. The group is launching a copy of Amgen’s Neupogen. And in the process, Sandoz has unleashed a fresh wave of biosimilars hitting the US market. However, Amgen won somewhere else — the FDA rejected Coherus Biosciences’ application for a biosimilar of Amgen’s blockbuster Neulasta (a drug that fights infections in cancer patients). This action effectively delays any rival until 2018, at the earliest. The FDA's response comes as Amgen gears up for biosimilar competition for Neulasta, which generated about US$ 4.6 billion in sales last year. The FDA requested Coherus for a re-analysis of certain data and asked the drug developer for more manufacturing information. WHO updates list of essential medicines; groups antibiotics into three categories   Last week, the World Health Organization (WHO) released its Essential Medicines List (EML), with a new advice on which antibiotics to use for common infections and which to preserve for serious circumstances. Amongst the additions to the WHO Model list of essential medicines for 2017 are medicines for HIV, hepatitis C, tuberculosis and leukaemia. The EML is used by many countries to increase access to medicines. The updated list has added 30 drugs for adults and 25 for children, and specifies new uses for 9 already-listed products. In all, it contains 433 drugs deemed essential to address the most important public health needs. This time, WHO has grouped antibiotics into three categories – ACCESS, WATCH and RESERVE – with recommendations on when each category should be used.  Initially, the new categories apply only to antibiotics used to treat 21 of the most common general infections. If found useful, it could be broadened in future versions of the EML to apply to drugs to treat other infections. Antibiotics in the ACCESS group must be available at all times as treatments for a wide range of common infections. It includes drugs like amoxicillin, an antibiotic used to treat infections such as pneumonia. The WATCH group includes antibiotics that are recommended as first- or second-choice treatments for a small number of infections. For example, the use of ciprofloxacin, used to treat cystitis (a type of urinary tract infection) and upper respiratory tract infections (such as bacterial sinusitis and bacterial bronchitis), should be dramatically reduced to avoid further development of resistance. The third group, RESERVE, includes antibiotics that should be considered as last resorts, such as colistin and some cephalosporins. These must be used only in the most severe circumstances when all other alternatives have failed.  

Impressions: 3373

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/j-j-s-diabetes-drug-reduces-heart-risk-at-the-cost-of-toes-google-s-ai-eye-doctor-initiative

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
15 Jun 2017
Haunted: Teva’s $1.2 billion ‘pay-for-delay’ penalty; which companies will get hit next?
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., which acquired Cephalon in 2012, will make a total payment of $1.2 billion as part of a ‘pay-for-delay’ settlement reached with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) last week.  What exactly did Cephalon, for which Teva paid $6.8 billion, do so wrong? Isn’t ‘pay-for-delay’ common practice in the pharmaceutical industry?   First of all what is a pay-for-delay? ‘Pay for delay’ or reverse payment patent settlements, are agreements where the brand name drug manufacturer compensates generics, not to market the generic product for a specific period of time.  These settlements allow the brand manufacturers to extend their patent monopolies and according to an FTC study, these deals cost consumers and taxpayers $3.5 billion in higher drug costs every year.   What exactly happens and why is it a big deal now? Cephalon allegedly paid four generic drug companies (Teva, Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Mylan Pharmaceuticals, and Barr Laboratories), over $300 million in total. In return the generics agreed to drop their patent challenges and forgo marketing of their generic versions of Cephalon’s blockbuster sleep-disorder drug Provigil, for six years, until April 2012.  An extended monopoly for Provigil, in the absence of generic competition, was “$4 billion in sales that no one expected”, the CEO of Cephalon reportedly said when the deal was struck.  While in Europe, regulators have been going after pay-for-delay cases for years, it was only as recently as 2013, in FTC v. Actavis, that the U.S. Supreme Court made clear that reverse payment patent settlements are subject to the same antitrust rules that govern general U.S. business conduct. The payment made by Teva will compensate purchasers, including drug wholesalers, pharmacies, and insurers, who overpaid because of Cephalon’s illegal conduct, is the first positive outcome for the FTC after the Supreme Court ruling.   How common are ‘pay-for-delay’ settlements? Based on data provided by the FTC, for the past few years, more than 100 settlements are reached annually between brand and generic pharmaceutical companies. Over 30% of these settlements have the potential of being ‘pay-for-delay’ agreements.   Table// Potential pay-for-delay settlements reached between brand and generic companies:   Financial Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Final Settlements: between brand and generic companies 14 11 28 33 66 68 113 156 140 145 Involving First Generic Filing 8 5 11 16 29 32 49 54 43 41 Potential Pay-for-Delay: Involving First Generic Filing 2 9 11 13 15 26 18 23 13 Settlements 3 14 14 16 19 31 28 40 29   How severe are the penalties for ‘pay-for-delay’ settlements in Europe?  The European Commission has fined Johnson & Johnson (J&J) just under 10.8 million euros and Novartis 5.49 million euros, after discovering a ‘pay-for-delay’ deal on the painkiller Duragesic (fentanyl). The amount pales in comparison to the whopping €428m fine on Servier and several other companies (Niche/ Unichem; Matrix, which is now part of Mylan; Teva; Krka and Lupin) for conspiring to delay generics of the widely-used blood pressure drug Coversyl/ Aceon (perindopril).   In yet another settlement, agreements which operated in 2002 and 2003 between the Danish originator Lundbeck, and other generic companies, resulted in Euro 146 million in fines.   What should we expect in the future? Based on an FTC presentation made in September 2014, they highlighted 19 Cases to Watch, which has them targeting almost every major brand and generic pharmaceutical company. However, with the complexities involved, this list is continuously evolving: The cases (by name of the brand product) Actos, Adderall, Aggrenox, AndroGel, Cipro, Effexor, K-Dur, Lamictal, Lidoderm, Lipitor, Loestrin, Nexium, Niaspan, Opana, Provigil, Skelaxin, Solodyn, Wellbutrin.The brand companies involvedAbbvie, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Besins, Biovail, Boehringer, Cephalon, Endo, GlaxoSmithKline, King, Medicis, Pfizer, Shire, Schering, Takeda, Warner Chilcott, Wyeth.The generic companies Actavis , Barr, Duramed, Dr. Reddy’s, HMR, Impax, Lupin, Mutual, Mylan, Par, Perrigo, Ranbaxy, Rugby, Sandoz, Teva, Upsher Smith.   Our view: Pharmaceutical companies, lawyers and the FTC will be busy for the coming few years, since there are a series of suits, which will be challenging settlements reached between brand and generic pharmaceutical companies.  While patents provide temporary monopolies to promote innovation, brand drug manufacturers will need to resort to more innovative ways of sustaining their profits. Click here and learn about the different strategies adopted in the United States to block generics?  

Impressions: 3400

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/haunted-teva-s-1-2-billion-pay-for-delay-penalty-which-companies-will-get-hit-next

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
04 Jun 2015