Please Wait
Applying Filters...
Menu
Xls

Digital Content read-more

Create Content with PharmaCompass, ask us

DATA COMPILATION #PharmaFlow

read-more
read-more
CEP Q1 2026 Update: CEP 2.0, EDQM’s new guidelines strengthen ecosystem; Indian firms top list of CEPs issued
PharmaCompass is introducing a new regulatory update that tracks developments in Certificates of Suitability to the Monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia, referred to as CEPs. These certificates are a critical regulatory instrument in the global pharmaceutical supply chain.Also known as a Certification of Suitability (COS), CEPs are issued by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare (EDQM), with or without inspection of the manufacturing site. A CEP must be renewed every five years from its original issue date to remain valid, regardless of any revisions made during the interim period. However, a CEP does not replace Good Manufacturing Practice certification.CEPs are recognized as a trusted reference for API quality, thereby simplifying global registration strategies. Apart from Europe, the CEP system is widely used by many regulatory authorities, including those in Canada, Australia, Brazil, Singapore and South Africa. View CEPs Issued in Q1 2026 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available)CEP 2.0 enhances regulatory clarity, brings efficiency, global interoperability There are several types of CEPs, depending on the nature of the substance and evaluation. The most common type is the Chemical CEP, which confirms that a chemically synthesized API meets standards for purity and impurity control. Then there are Herbal CEPs for herbal substances and preparations.Another key category is the TSE CEP, which addresses risks associated with transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in animal-derived materials. In addition, there are Combined CEPs that may cover multiple aspects, such as chemical quality, TSE risk, and sterility. However, biological products such as vaccines and blood products fall outside the scope of the CEP framework.In 2023, the CEP system underwent a major transformation with the introduction of CEP 2.0, which marks a shift from a largely document-based system to a more structured, transparent, and digitally aligned model. This makes it easier for companies to manage compliance while improving trust among global regulators.While increasing data and compliance requirements for API manufacturers, CEP 2.0 enables better regulatory clarity, streamlined dossier integration, and stronger global acceptance. Overall, CEP 2.0 is designed to enhance regulatory clarity while making the system more efficient and globally interoperable. View CEPs Issued in Q1 2026 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available)Indian firms issued maximum CEPs; Sun Pharma and its subsidiaries, Jubilant Biosys top listIndia topped the charts for CEPs issued, both in terms of new CEPs and revisions in the first quarter (Q1) of 2026. Indian companies were issued 81 new CEPs in Q1 2026 (as against 40 in Q1 2025) and 203 revisions (as against 129 in Q1 2025). In comparison, Chinese companies were issued 42 new CEPs in Q1 2026 (against 25 in Q1 2025) and 53 revisions (against 67 in Q1 2025). Italy came a distant third, followed by Germany and Spain.India’s Sun Pharmaceuticals and its subsidiaries topped the list of companies with the maximum number of CEPs issued— while no new CEP was issued, 27 CEPs were revised in Q1 2026. At second place was Jubilant Biosys — 21 CEPs were revised in Q1 2026.In terms of products, the maximum CEPs were issued for amlodipine besylate (a calcium channel blocker used for treating hypertension), followed by sitagliptin phosphate (a type 2 diabetes medicine) and pregabalin (a drug used to treat neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, seizures, and generalized anxiety disorder). Both amlodipine besylate and sitagliptin phosphate had not been issued new CEPs or revisions in Q1 2025. View CEPs Issued in Q1 2026 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available)EDQM introduces new guidelines to accelerate CEP assessments The EDQM charges fees for various services related to CEPs that depend on the type of request or regulatory activity involved. In general, fees apply to handling CEP applications, revisions or renewals and for offering technical advice (where applicants seek scientific or regulatory guidance).In March 2026, the EDQM introduced two new guidelines aimed at accelerating CEP assessments. The first is a reliance-based assessment pathway, which allows regulators to leverage prior approvals from trusted authorities, such as those in the EU, UK, Australia, Canada, and the WHO pre-qualification program. The second is a fast-track assessment route designed to expedite reviews in situations such as medicine shortages and to support initiatives like the EU Critical Medicines Act.Timelines have been significantly compressed under these new pathways. Initial evaluations are completed within 46 working days, compared to up to 115 days under the standard procedure. Applicants are given 30 calendar days to respond to queries, after which regulators complete the final assessment within 23 working days.Another important regulatory update relates to electronic submissions. From April 1, 2026, the EDQM will reject non-compliant CEP applications at the point of submission. All applications must include a validated electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) dossier along with a proper validation report, submitted in line with the updated Common European Submission Portal (CESP) guidelines. Taken together, these developments signal a more rigorous yet efficient CEP ecosystem. View CEPs Issued in Q1 2026 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available)Our viewThe shift to CEP 2.0 signals a move toward greater transparency, digitalization, and global regulatory alignment. Though enhanced disclosure and stricter e-submission requirements may increase the compliance burden, especially for smaller manufacturers, the long-term gains are expected to be significant. Going forward, companies that invest in data quality and regulatory readiness stand to gain from these changes.

Impressions: 2593

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/cep-q1-2026-update-cep-2-0-edqm-s-new-guidelines-strengthen-ecosystem-indian-firms-top-list-of-ceps-issued

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
09 Apr 2026

WEEKLY NEWS RECAP #Phispers

read-more
read-more
Pfizer’s manufacturing woes continue; IQVIA’s Global Oncology Trends; FDA Quality Alerts
This week in Phispers, we bring you the latest on Pfizer’s manufacturing woes, attributed largely to its much-touted US$ 17 billion acquisition of Hospira in 2015. Sun Pharma bagged FDA approval for its treatment for prostate cancer — Yonsa. The FDA brought out educational videos on biosimilars, while its commissioner discussed the agency’s policy plans for gene therapy. IQVIA released a report on how cancer treatments have been advancing at a rapid pace. J&J got hit by another jury verdict pertaining to asbestos in its baby powder. And in compliance news, FDA issued a warning letter to Chinese caffeine producer found with duplicate documents; and Allergan recalled birth control pills due to a packaging error. Pfizer’s manufacturing woes continue, as Apotex recalls antibiotic made by Hospira   Drug major Pfizer’s production problems continue to make headlines. Recently, Apotex Corp voluntarily recalled 1.8 million bottles of antibiotics made at Pfizer’s Hospira operation in India. According to the FDA website, Apotex is voluntarily recalling 36 lots of Piperacillin and Tazobactam for Injection — USP 3.375 gram/vial and 4.5 gram/vial strengths. The antibiotic injections have been found to contain elevated levels of impurities that may result in decreased potency. According to the FDA, the decreased potency, in turn, could result in worsening of the infection and under extreme circumstances lead to serious morbidities. Manufactured by Hospira, the product is distributed in the US market by Apotex Corp. A recent article in Fortune puts the blame on Pfizer’s much-touted US$ 17 billion acquisition of Hospira in 2015 for turning the United States’ chronic drug shortage into a full-blown crisis.  According to the article, as of May 11 this year, Pfizer — which is the world’s largest maker of sterile injectable drugs — had 370 products that are depleted or in limited supply, 102 of which the company has indicated will not be available until 2019. “The simple answer to why America currently has so many shortages of generic sterile injectable drugs: America’s leading manufacturer of generic sterile injectable drugs hasn’t been ­making them,” the article said. Mylan’s flagship product EpiPen is also likely to face shortage if its manufacturing partner — Pfizer — does not resolve its problems in the United States. Mylan is putting pressure on Pfizer to do more to tackle shortages of this life-saving medicine. Although Mylan owns the rights to the EpiPen, it subcontracts manufacturing of the auto-injector to Meridian Medical Technologies, a division of Pfizer. However, Pfizer has struggled to meet demand for EpiPen and earlier this month, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had put the medicine on its official shortages list. In September last year, the FDA had issued a warning letter to Meridian Medical Technologies over serious component and product failures that had been associated with patient deaths.  Sun Pharma bags FDA nod for prostate cancer drug; signals trouble for J&J’s Zytiga   There was big news from Sun Pharma, a leading pharma company from India. Its drug to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) — Yonsa — won the US FDA approval. Sun will launch the drug in the US through its licensing partner Churchill Pharmaceuticals, which is also the original developer of the drug. Churchill is eligible for upfront fees, as well as milestone payments and royalties. Churchill Pharmaceuticals, based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, had announced the New Drug Application for Yonsa on July 20, 2017. Earlier this year, Johnson & Johnson’s prostate cancer blockbuster — Zytiga — took an unexpected hit when a US court stripped away a key patent. This court order opened the prospects of generic launches of Zytiga later this year. And that’s something J&J is working hard to avoid. Though Yonsa is not a generic, it is definitely a competitor for J&J’s Zytiga, a drug that generated sales of US$ 1.23 billion in the US in 2017. Sun’s Yonsa contains the same active ingredient as Zytiga—abiraterone acetate. However, Yonsa’s formulation doesn’t step on J&J’s patents. Yonsa is approved in combination with methylprednisolone to treat patients with mCRPC. It can be taken with or without food. Zytiga is approved for use in combination with a different steroid — prednisone. J&J is expected to appeal that patent decision. Unless some suits get filed against Sun or Churchill, Yonsa should enter the market. FDA releases five-part video on biosimilars; plans to encourage gene therapy   As part of a larger education and outreach effort, the FDA released a new five-part video series highlighting biosimilars and interchangeable products. The videos highlight key concepts about the development and approval of these products, as well as how state-of-the-art technologies and tools are used to demonstrate biosimilarity. A biosimilar is a biological product that is highly similar to, and has no clinically meaningful differences from, an existing FDA-approved reference product. So far, the agency has approved 10 biosimilars. Many of these biosimilars treat serious and life-threatening illnesses. The number of FDA-approved biosimilar products continues to grow. “They’re just as safe and effective as their traditional counterparts, and they could provide enormous savings to consumers through product competition,” FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said in the first video.  Last week, Gottlieb also discussed the agency’s policy plans for gene therapy at the annual board meeting of the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine. He spoke about FDA’s role in facilitating gene therapy, and also quoted an MIT study that predicts 40 FDA-approved gene therapy products by the end of 2022. “FDA has more than 500 active investigational new drug applications involving gene therapy products,” Gottlieb said. “We’ve received more than one hundred such applications last year alone. This shows the intensity of scientific work going on in this field.” Gottlieb said some gene therapies may qualify for the regenerative medicine advanced therapy (RMAT) designation — a status established by the 21st Century Cures Act that confers benefits of fast track and breakthrough designations. Developers may also apply for accelerated approval. IQVIA’s Global Oncology Trends says cancer treatments advancing at rapid pace   Last week, Phispers had carried a report on how the US FDA had lashed out at IQVIA — a leading global provider of advanced analytics, technology solutions, and contract research services to the life sciences industry — as the agency had found mistakes in its opioid sales data. This week, there is some positive news from IQVIA. According to a report prepared by IQVIA — Global Oncology Trends 2018 — cancer treatments have been advancing at an accelerated pace in recent years, offering notable improvements in clinical benefit to patients. According to the report, 63 cancer drugs had been launched in the last five years. The continued rise and impact of immuno-oncology has been largely centered on the PD-1 and PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors, which have broad efficacy across solid tumors and are used across 23 different tumor types. Of the 14 New Active Substance cancer therapeutics launched in 2017 alone, all of them were targeted therapies and 11 of them were granted Breakthrough Therapy designations by the FDA. The report also talks of global spending on cancer medicines — which increased from US$ 96 billion in 2013 to US$ 133 billion globally in 2017. However, spending on cancer medicines is heavily concentrated on a handful of therapies, with the top 35 drugs accounting for 80 percent of total spending.  According to the report, the global market for oncology therapeutic medicines will reach as much as US$ 200 billion by 2022, averaging 10 to 13 percent growth over the next five years, with the US market reaching as much as US$ 100 billion by 2022, averaging 12 to 15 percent growth. J&J hit by another ‘asbestos-in-talc’ cancer case; to pay millions in compensation   Its smell may still remind us of our childhood, but for Johnson & Johnson its baby powder has caused it much distress. For years, J&J has been battling some 6,000 cases that allege its baby powder caused ovarian cancer. Recently, the litigations took a new focus with plaintiffs claiming the widely used powder causes mesothelioma due to alleged asbestos contamination. Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive form of cancer that develops in the lining of the lungs, abdomen or heart. It has no known cure and is said to be caused by asbestos. Last week, J&J and its talc suppliers were slapped a US$ 21.7 million jury verdict in a lawsuit by a 68-year old woman — Joanne Anderson — who said she developed mesothelioma after being exposed to asbestos in the company’s baby powder.  The verdict marked the second such trial loss for J&J. In April, a New Jersey state court jury had ordered J&J and its talc supplier, a unit of Imerys SA, to pay US$ 117 million to a man who alleged he developed mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure from J&J Baby Powder. An appeal is pending. Of the US$ 21.7 million the jury awarded in compensatory damages, J&J was assigned 67 percent, with the rest distributed among other defendants. J&J has denied its talc products contain asbestos or cause cancer, citing decades of testing by independent laboratories and scientists. But plaintiffs claim that asbestos and talc, which are closely linked minerals, are intermingled in the mining process, making it impossible to remove the carcinogenic substance. The company and Imerys, as well as a local drugstore chain in the US, are also facing another mesothelioma trial in a South Carolina court. FDA warning letter to Chinese caffeine producer found with duplicate documents   This week, the FDA posted a warning letter issued to Jilin Shulan Synthetic Pharmaceutical, a manufacturer of caffeine API in China. The letter reveals flagrant data-integrity violations. During the November 2017 inspection, the FDA investigator uncovered dual sets of laboratory records in which one set of records included out-of-specification (OOS) results while the second set included results within specifications. The firm’s quality department acknowledged this practice during the inspection and said it failed to investigate OOS deviations due to lack of cGMP knowledge on part of its staff. The FDA investigator also discovered blank batch production records that were pre-signed by operators, partially-completed batch records, and batch records with data changes in pencil without any justification. Moreover, the FDA investigator found two process batch records for the same operation — one record was partially filled out by one operator, while the second one was completed by a different operator. In another case, the FDA investigator found a note in a batch record stating there had been a manufacturing process deviation for which the operator involved was to be fined 50 yuan (US$ 7.8). There was no formal deviation report documented in the GMP system. At Jilin Shulan Synthetic, audit trails were enabled in their standalone analytical instruments like high-performance liquid chromatography systems, gas chromatography systems, and infrared radiation system. The FDA had placed the firm on import alert on March 1, 2018. Allergan recalls birth control pill due to packaging error in the US   Allergan Plc issued a voluntary recall in the US market of its birth control pill — Taytulla (norethindrone acetate and ethinyl estradiol capsules and ferrous fumarate capsules). In its recall announcement, Allergan states it recently identified, through a physician report, that four placebo capsules were placed out of order in a sample pack of Taytulla. Taytulla is an oral contraceptive, available in a 28-count blister card pack that has 24 ‘active’ pink softgel capsules (with hormones) with ‘WC’ printed on the outer shell in white to be taken for 24 days, followed by four maroon softgel capsules (without hormones) also imprinted with ‘WC’ on one side to be taken for the next four days. Specifically, the first four days of therapy had four non-hormonal placebo capsules instead of active capsules. As a result of this packaging error, oral contraceptive capsules that are taken out of sequence, may place the user at risk for contraceptive failure and unintended pregnancy.  

Impressions: 4023

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-phisper/pfizer-s-manufacturing-woes-continue-iqvia-s-global-oncology-trends-fda-quality-alerts

#Phispers by PHARMACOMPASS
31 May 2018

NEWS #PharmaBuzz

read-more
read-more

https://www.pharmacompass.com/pdf/news/enforcement-report-week-of-february-4-2026-48317.pdf

FDA
04 Feb 2026

https://www.pharmacompass.com/pdf/news/enforcement-report-week-of-may-31-2023-56013.pdf

FDA
31 May 2023

https://www.pharmacompass.com/pdf/news/enforcement-report-week-of-february-22-2023-51785.pdf

FDA
22 Feb 2023

https://www.pharmacompass.com/pdf/news/enforcement-report-week-of-april-13-2022-1649826529.pdf

FDA
13 Apr 2022

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=207481

FDA
21 Sep 2021

https://www.pharmacompass.com/pdf/news/enforcement-report-week-of-august-25-2021-1629867988.pdf

FDA
25 Aug 2021