Please Wait
Applying Filters...
Menu
Xls

Digital Content read-more

Create Content with PharmaCompass, ask us

DATA COMPILATION #PharmaFlow

read-more
read-more
CEP Q1 2026 Update: CEP 2.0, EDQM’s new guidelines strengthen ecosystem; Indian firms top list of CEPs issued
PharmaCompass is introducing a new regulatory update that tracks developments in Certificates of Suitability to the Monographs of the European Pharmacopoeia, referred to as CEPs. These certificates are a critical regulatory instrument in the global pharmaceutical supply chain.Also known as a Certification of Suitability (COS), CEPs are issued by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare (EDQM), with or without inspection of the manufacturing site. A CEP must be renewed every five years from its original issue date to remain valid, regardless of any revisions made during the interim period. However, a CEP does not replace Good Manufacturing Practice certification.CEPs are recognized as a trusted reference for API quality, thereby simplifying global registration strategies. Apart from Europe, the CEP system is widely used by many regulatory authorities, including those in Canada, Australia, Brazil, Singapore and South Africa. View CEPs Issued in Q1 2026 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available)CEP 2.0 enhances regulatory clarity, brings efficiency, global interoperability There are several types of CEPs, depending on the nature of the substance and evaluation. The most common type is the Chemical CEP, which confirms that a chemically synthesized API meets standards for purity and impurity control. Then there are Herbal CEPs for herbal substances and preparations.Another key category is the TSE CEP, which addresses risks associated with transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in animal-derived materials. In addition, there are Combined CEPs that may cover multiple aspects, such as chemical quality, TSE risk, and sterility. However, biological products such as vaccines and blood products fall outside the scope of the CEP framework.In 2023, the CEP system underwent a major transformation with the introduction of CEP 2.0, which marks a shift from a largely document-based system to a more structured, transparent, and digitally aligned model. This makes it easier for companies to manage compliance while improving trust among global regulators.While increasing data and compliance requirements for API manufacturers, CEP 2.0 enables better regulatory clarity, streamlined dossier integration, and stronger global acceptance. Overall, CEP 2.0 is designed to enhance regulatory clarity while making the system more efficient and globally interoperable. View CEPs Issued in Q1 2026 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available)Indian firms issued maximum CEPs; Sun Pharma and its subsidiaries, Jubilant Biosys top listIndia topped the charts for CEPs issued, both in terms of new CEPs and revisions in the first quarter (Q1) of 2026. Indian companies were issued 81 new CEPs in Q1 2026 (as against 40 in Q1 2025) and 203 revisions (as against 129 in Q1 2025). In comparison, Chinese companies were issued 42 new CEPs in Q1 2026 (against 25 in Q1 2025) and 53 revisions (against 67 in Q1 2025). Italy came a distant third, followed by Germany and Spain.India’s Sun Pharmaceuticals and its subsidiaries topped the list of companies with the maximum number of CEPs issued— while no new CEP was issued, 27 CEPs were revised in Q1 2026. At second place was Jubilant Biosys — 21 CEPs were revised in Q1 2026.In terms of products, the maximum CEPs were issued for amlodipine besylate (a calcium channel blocker used for treating hypertension), followed by sitagliptin phosphate (a type 2 diabetes medicine) and pregabalin (a drug used to treat neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, seizures, and generalized anxiety disorder). Both amlodipine besylate and sitagliptin phosphate had not been issued new CEPs or revisions in Q1 2025. View CEPs Issued in Q1 2026 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available)EDQM introduces new guidelines to accelerate CEP assessments The EDQM charges fees for various services related to CEPs that depend on the type of request or regulatory activity involved. In general, fees apply to handling CEP applications, revisions or renewals and for offering technical advice (where applicants seek scientific or regulatory guidance).In March 2026, the EDQM introduced two new guidelines aimed at accelerating CEP assessments. The first is a reliance-based assessment pathway, which allows regulators to leverage prior approvals from trusted authorities, such as those in the EU, UK, Australia, Canada, and the WHO pre-qualification program. The second is a fast-track assessment route designed to expedite reviews in situations such as medicine shortages and to support initiatives like the EU Critical Medicines Act.Timelines have been significantly compressed under these new pathways. Initial evaluations are completed within 46 working days, compared to up to 115 days under the standard procedure. Applicants are given 30 calendar days to respond to queries, after which regulators complete the final assessment within 23 working days.Another important regulatory update relates to electronic submissions. From April 1, 2026, the EDQM will reject non-compliant CEP applications at the point of submission. All applications must include a validated electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) dossier along with a proper validation report, submitted in line with the updated Common European Submission Portal (CESP) guidelines. Taken together, these developments signal a more rigorous yet efficient CEP ecosystem. View CEPs Issued in Q1 2026 (Power BI Dashboard, Free Excel Available)Our viewThe shift to CEP 2.0 signals a move toward greater transparency, digitalization, and global regulatory alignment. Though enhanced disclosure and stricter e-submission requirements may increase the compliance burden, especially for smaller manufacturers, the long-term gains are expected to be significant. Going forward, companies that invest in data quality and regulatory readiness stand to gain from these changes.

Impressions: 2590

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/cep-q1-2026-update-cep-2-0-edqm-s-new-guidelines-strengthen-ecosystem-indian-firms-top-list-of-ceps-issued

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
09 Apr 2026

WEEKLY NEWS RECAP #Phispers

read-more
read-more
FDA hikes ANDA, DMF application fee; Sanofi faces charges of manslaughter in France
This week, Phispers brings you the user fee FDA will collect in FY 2021 from drug makers, CMOs and medical device makers. In France, Sanofi was indicted for manslaughter, over birth defects linked to an epilepsy drug, in a long-running case. In Covid-19 vaccine updates, there is news that the US government would pay US$ 2.1 billion to Sanofi and GSK for their Covid-19 vaccine to cover 50 million Americans and to underwrite their testing and manufacturing. Pfizer and BioNTech have agreed to supply 120 million doses of their experimental vaccine to Japan in the first half of 2021. Teva and Takeda have decided to sell a large chunk of generic assets of their business venture in Japan to Nichi-Iko Pharmaceutical Company.  The US Department of Justice is demanding over US$ 11 billion in criminal and civil penalties from the infamous OxyContin opioid manufacturer — Purdue Pharma — as part of its bankruptcy reorganization plan.  EMA’s human medicines committee has recommended the suspension of the marketing authorizations of generic medicines tested by Panexcell at its site in Mumbai. FDA publishes new user fees for FY 2021; sharp increase in ANDA and DMF fees Last week, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published the user fee amounts it will collect in FY 2021 from manufacturers of pharmaceuticals, generic drugs, biosimilars, medical devices and outsourcing facilities. Unlike last year, when the fees were either marginally lowered or kept unchanged, this year the FDA has substantially increased the fee for ANDAs (abbreviated new drug applications) and DMFs (drug master files). However, the agency has substantially reduced the fee under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA VI) for applications, though the PDUFA VI program fee has been hiked by US$ 11,008. The fee for facilities — APIs, FDFs as well as CMOs — have been reduced. And the fee under the GDUFA program for large and medium-sized generic drug applicants have also been reduced substantially. FDA User Fee Table FY 2021 Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA VI)(in US$) FY 2021 FY 2020 Change Applications:       Requiring clinical data 2,875,842 2,942,965 -67,123 Not requiring clinical data 1,437,921 1,471,483 -33,562 Program fee 336,432 325,424 11,008 Generic Drug User Fee Amendments (GDUFA II) FY 2021 FY 2020 Change Applications:       Abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) 196,868 176,237 20,631 Drug master file (DMF) 69,921 57,795 12,126 Facilities:       Active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) – Domestic 41,671 44,400 -2,729 API – Foreign 56,671 59,400 -2,729 Finished dosage form (FDF) – Domestic 184,022 195,662 -11,640 FDF – Foreign 199,022 210,662 -11,640 Contract manufacturing organization (CMO) – Domestic 61,341 65,221 -3,880 CMO – Foreign 76,341 80,221 -3,880 GDUFA program:       Large size operation generic drug applicant 1,542,993 1,661,684 -118,691 Medium size operation generic drug applicant 617,197 664,674 -47,477 Small business operation generic drug applicant 154,299 166,168 -11,869 EMA shares list of medicines impacted by data integrity concerns at Panexcell PharmaCompass has routinely covered news about how contract research organizations (CROs) have faced the flak of regulators over the last four to five years. This includes companies like Semler Research Center and Micro Therapeutics Research Labs. In March this year, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) had started a review of medicines for which studies had been conducted by Indian CRO - Panexcell Clinical Laboratories Private Limited - at its site in Mumbai, India. The EMA had raised clinical data-integrity concerns at Panexcell. This week, we bring you news that the EMA’s human medicines committee (CHMP) has recommended the suspension of the marketing authorizations of generic medicines tested by Panexcell at its site in Mumbai. The recommendation comes after Austrian and German inspectors found irregularities in how the company carried out bioequivalence studies. These are studies used to show that a generic medicine produces the same amount of active substance in the body as the reference medicine. “The inspectors found samples from different patients that were exceptionally similar and an instance of personnel documenting the wrong room temperature for the area where samples were being processed. These findings raise serious concerns about the company’s quality management system and the reliability of data from that site,” says an EMA statement.  The CHMP looked at all medicines tested by Panexcell on behalf of EU companies and found none for which adequate data was available from other sources. Therefore, the committee recommended “all medicines authorized in the EU on the basis of bioequivalence studies conducted by Panexcell be suspended from the market.”  Sanofi charged with manslaughter over birth defects linked to its epilepsy drug In France, prosecutors have indicted pharma giant Sanofi for manslaughter over birth defects linked to its epilepsy drug — valproate, which is marketed as Depakine — in a long-running case. Studies say valproate had caused disabilities in about 15,000-30,000 children whose mothers took the medicine during their pregnancies. The drug has been on the market since 1967 and is used to treat epilepsy, migraines and bipolar disorder. Research found that when pregnant women took the drug, their children had an elevated risk — between 10 to 40 percent — of congenital malformations, autism and learning difficulties. This week, Sanofi confirmed a newspaper report that said prosecutors have now also charged it with manslaughter over the devastating effects of Depakine. However, the company insisted it had “fulfilled its obligation” of providing information on the drug and its side-effects, and said it “contests the validity of these proceedings.” Sanofi said it has filed a legal challenge to the indictment. The investigation will determine whether Sanofi can be held responsible for the deaths of four babies in the late 1990s and early 2000s, whose mothers took Depakine while they were pregnant. Sanofi is also facing charges of aggravated fraud and unintentionally causing injury in 42 cases filed by families. The company says it had warned health authorities of the drug’s risks in the 1980s. US government demands US$ 13 billion in Purdue Pharma bankruptcy case The US Department of Justice (DOJ) is demanding that Purdue Pharma, maker of the infamous OxyContin opioid painkiller, pay over US$ 13 billion in criminal and civil penalties as part of its bankruptcy reorganization plan, according to people familiar with the claims. Purdue had filed for bankruptcy protection nearly a year ago. Due to its Chapter 11 bankruptcy case, the court had halted over 2,600 lawsuits brought by cities, counties, states, hospitals and other plaintiffs alleging the company and its billionaire owners — the Sackler family — were major contributors to the US opioid epidemic. The company and the Sackler family have denied the allegations. The DOJ had to meet a July 30 deadline to assert financial claims against the company. The federal prosecutors want Purdue to pay as much as US$ 6.2 billion on the criminal side and about US$ 5 billion in civil compensation for tax dollars spent battling the US opioid epidemic and the havoc wreaked by allegedly illegal marketing of the drug, a Bloomberg report said. The size of the claims represent the upper limit of penalties federal prosecutors might seek, and the ultimate sums paid to resolve the investigations are likely to be far lower. The DOJ is among thousands of creditors vying to extract money from Purdue, which has a liquidation value of only a bit more than US$ 2 billion. Teva, Takeda to sell chunk of generic assets of Japanese venture to Nichi-Iko Pharma In April 2016, Japanese drug maker Takeda and Israeli generic giant Teva had announced the establishment of Teva Takeda Yakuhin. This joint venture was to meet the wide-ranging needs of patients for generics in Japan. Last week, the two drug companies announced that they are shifting focus of this business venture to commercializing a selection of complex generics, specialty assets and other pipeline opportunities. This shift will include a divestment of the majority of the joint venture company’s generic and operational assets to Nichi-Iko Pharmaceutical. This transaction is expected to close by early 2021. The strategic shift is the result of an “in-depth review of market opportunities” five years after the joint venture’s launch, Teva said.  The Japanese venture will retain approximately 20 generic molecules and several pipeline assets, as well as its robust portfolio of authorized generics, LLPs and specialty assets. Teva didn’t specify how much of the venture’s portfolio would be sold off. The downsizing of the joint venture comes months after Teva wrapped up a multiyear restructuring that closed down facilities around the world and cut around 13,000 jobs. Of late, Takeda has also been shedding assets to hit its goal of cutting annual operating costs and retiring the debt it took on to buy Shire in January 2019. Vaccine updates: Sanofi, GSK sign deal with US; Japan to buy Pfizer’s vaccine; J&J starts human trials Last week, the US government announced the biggest award yet under Operation Warp Speed (OWS), the White House initiative aimed at accelerating access to vaccines and treatments to fight Covid-19. In a deal announced by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the government would pay US$ 2.1 billion to Sanofi SA and GlaxoSmithKline Plc for Covid-19 vaccines to cover 50 million people and to underwrite the drug makers’ testing and manufacturing. The Sanofi-GSK deal is for 100 million doses and gives the US government the option to purchase another 500 million doses of the vaccine if it proves safe and effective (the value of this deal is not specified). Sanofi and GSK plan to start clinical trials for the vaccine in September. The cost per person inoculated comes to US$ 42 and is similar to the US$ 40 per patient the US government agreed to pay Pfizer and BioNTech, when it inked an approximately US$ 2 billion deal for 50 million courses of their potential vaccine, a few days prior to this announcement. GSK said in a statement that more than half of the total funding will go into further development of the vaccine, including clinical trials, with the remainder being used for a manufacturing ramp-up and delivery of doses. Japan to buy 120 million doses of Pfizer’s vaccine: Pfizer Inc and BioNTech SE said they have agreed to supply Japan 120 million doses of their experimental coronavirus vaccine in the first half of 2021. However, the companies have not disclosed the financial details of the agreement. BioNTech and Pfizer began a large, late-stage trial of their vaccine candidate to demonstrate its efficacy. The companies say that they are on track to seek regulatory review for the vaccine in October. After promising data from monkey study, J&J to start human trials: Last week, Johnson & Johnson said it has started human safety trials in the US for its Covid-19 vaccine after a study in monkeys showed that its experimental vaccine candidate offered strong protection in a single dose. According to a study published in Nature, when exposed to the virus, six out of six monkeys who got the vaccine candidate were completely protected from lung disease and five out of six were protected from infection as measured by the presence of virus in their nasal swabs. “This gives us confidence that we can test a single-shot vaccine in this epidemic and learn whether it has a protective effect in humans,” Paul Stoffels, J&J’s chief scientific officer, said. The US government is backing J&J’s vaccine effort with US$ 456 million in funding. The drugmaker said it had started early-stage human trials in the US and Belgium and would test its vaccine candidate in more than 1,000 healthy adults aged 18 to 55 years, as well as adults aged 65 years and older. CanSino faces trial obstacle: Chinese vaccine company CanSino Biologics Inc is facing a unique challenge in developing its vaccine for the novel coronavirus — it does not know where to conduct late-stage trial in order to stay in the global race to launch a vaccine soon. Mid-stage trials of CanSino’s experimental vaccine showed that it did not work as well in people with immunity to a particular strain of the common cold virus. It now needs to broaden its pool of testing in Phase 3 trials to see if that outcome, described by the company as “the biggest obstacle”, is replicated abroad. Most countries are pushing ahead with their own vaccine candidates. Moreover, tensions between China and the US are also posing a challenge for a collaboration to test its vaccine, and CanSino is losing out on time. The vaccine uses a harmless cold virus known as adenovirus type-5 (Ad5) to carry genetic material from the coronavirus into the body. “There is a large fraction of people both in the Western world and particularly in the developing world that have the baseline Ad5 neutralizing antibody,” said Dan Barouch, director of the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. CanSino’s co-founder said it was in talks with Russia, Brazil, Chile and Saudi Arabia to launch a Phase III trial. EU warns member states of syringe shortages: After the US took measures to ensure the supply of syringes ahead of the launch of a Covid-19 vaccine, the European Union, last week, warned member states of the risk of shortages of syringes, wipes and protective gear needed for mass vaccinations against Covid-19. The EU also urged its member states to consider joint procurement of these items. The EU has also asked member states to consider jointly buying more shots against influenza and increasing the number of people vaccinated to reduce the risk of simultaneous flu and Covid-19 outbreaks in autumn. “Covid-19 vaccines, once developed, may come without syringes and other items,” the EU Commission, the bloc’s executive arm, told health experts from European countries at a meeting last week.  

Impressions: 74693

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-phisper/fda-hikes-anda-dmf-application-fee-sanofi-faces-charges-of-manslaughter-in-france

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
06 Aug 2020

NEWS #PharmaBuzz

read-more
read-more

https://www.fiercepharma.com/marketing/jazz-hits-sour-note-back-back-rebukes-uk-marketing-watchdog

FIERCE PHARMA
11 Jul 2025

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cms_ia/importalert_189.html

FDA
12 May 2025

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=218793

FDA
19 Dec 2024

https://www.pharmacompass.com/pdf/news/enforcement-report-week-of-april-3-2024-41763.pdf

FDA
03 Apr 2024

https://www.pharmacompass.com/pdf/news/enforcement-report-week-of-june-7-2023-80553.pdf

FDA
07 Jun 2023

https://www.pharmacompass.com/pdf/news/enforcement-report-week-of-august-31-2022-1661930463.pdf

FDA
31 Aug 2022