Bora CDMO Bora CDMO

X

Find PharmaFlow Article for Ceritinib

PharmaCompass
API SUPPLIERS
API Suppliers

API Suppliers

US DMFs Filed

US DMFs Filed

CEP/COS Certifications

CEP/COS Certifications

0

JDMFs Filed

JDMFs Filed

0

Other Certificates

Other Certificates

Other Suppliers

Other Suppliers

API REF. PRICE (USD / KG)
INTERMEDIATES
DOSSIERS // FDF
USA (Orange Book)

USA (Orange Book)

Europe

Europe

0

Canada

Canada

0

Australia

Australia

0

South Africa

South Africa

0

Uploaded Dossiers

Uploaded Dossiers

0

GLOBAL SALES (USD Million)

U.S. Medicaid

Annual Reports

EXCIPIENTS
PATENTS & EXCLUSIVITIES

USFDA Orange Book Patents

USFDA Exclusivities

DIGITAL CONTENT

Blog #PharmaFlow

News

REF STANDARD

EDQM

0

USP

0

JP

0

Other Listed Suppliers

0

SERVICES

0

Who has the biggest one? Sales of the top pharma products by revenue.
We always knew math was fuzzy, but never imagined addition could get so complicated.  A recent publication on 2014 Global Prescription Medication Statistics listed the top pharmaceutical corporations by revenues, the best selling products along with the top therapy areas. The list, based on data published by IMS Health, caught us by surprise since a previous publication by FiercePharma had a completely different order when ranking the top 15 pharmaceutical companies.  As the difference in revenues of the top-10 companies was in excess of $60 billion and IMS Health’s data is an industry standard for decision making, we dug deeper to analyze the correlation between the information in the annual reports and IMS Health’s statistics. Which pharmaceutical company is the largest? Simply put, the answer is, ‘it depends’ on how you define a pharmaceutical company.  Should divisions like diagnostics, animal health, vaccines, consumer health be counted when determining the size of a pharmaceutical company? FiercePharma, in their analysis, used the total revenue of all divisions of the organizations to determine the largest organization; in their case it is Johnson & Johnson. IMS determines their numbers by measuring “prescription sales and dispensing” and hence, excludes divisions like diagnostics, consumer health and animal health, making Novartis the largest company. As currency exchange rate fluctuations have their own, big role, in determining the size of organizations, we believed it would be best to share the revenues, as presented, so that you can draw your own conclusions. Table 1/ Sales comparison for top pharmaceutical companies in 2014 from different sources (IMS, Fierce Pharma and Annual Reports)  Big Pharma IMS Rank IMS Sales (US $Mn) Fierce Pharma Rank Fierce Pharma Sales (US $Mn) Group Sales based on the Annual Report (Currency as reported, Mn)    Novartis 1 51,307 2 57,996 USD 57,996 Pfizer 2 44,929 4 49,605 USD 49,605 Sanofi 3 40,037 5 43,070 Euro 33,770 Roche 4 37,607 3 49,866 CHF 49,866 Merck & Co 5 36,550 6 42,237 USD 42,237 Johnson & Johnson 6 36,422 1 74,331 USD 74,331 AstraZeneca 7 33,313 8 26,095 USD 26,095 Glaxo SmithKline 8 31,470 7 37,960 GBP 23,006 Teva 9 26,001 11 20,272 USD 20,272 Gilead Sciences 10 23,673 10 24,474 USD 24,890 Amgen 11 20,473 12 20,063 USD 20,063 Lilly 12 19,909 14 19,615 USD 19,615 AbbVie 13 19,049 13 19,960 USD 19,960 Bayer 14 18,347 9 25,470 Euro 42,239 Bristol-Myers Squibb Not in Top 20 15 15,879 USD 15,879 NB: Mn is million Click here to access and download all the 2014 data (Excel version available) for FREE! Since each group has multiple divisions, we further split the sales for you to brainstorm: Table 2/ Sales comparison of the different divisions of top pharmaceutical companies in 2014 (Annual Reports in Mn)  Big Pharma Pharma Division Vaccine Division Generics Consumer Health Other Divisions Medical Devices/ Diagnostics Division Animal Health Division Divestures/ Other adjustments Novartis USD 31,791   Sandoz USD 9,562   Alcon USD 10,827     USD 5,816 Pfizer USD 45,708     USD 3,446 USD 451       Sanofi Euro 22,578 Euro 3,974 Euro 1,805 Euro 3,337     Euro 2,076   Roche CHF 38,969         CHF 10,897     Merck & Co USD 30,740 USD 5,302     USD 6,195       Johnson & Johnson USD 32,313     USD 14,496   USD 27,522     AstraZeneca USD 26,095               Glaxo SmithKline GBP 18,670     GBP 4,336         Teva USD 10,458   USD 9,814           Gilead Sciences USD 24,474             USD 416 Amgen USD 19,327       USD 736       Lilly USD 16,481       USD 788   USD 2,346   AbbVie USD 19,960               Bayer Euro 12,052     Euro 7,923       Euro 22,264 Bristol-Myers Squibb USD 15,879               Click here to access and download all the 2014 data (Excel version available) for FREE! Not sure that it adds any extra clarity on what should define a global pharmaceutical company… Since the various divisions make companies complicated to assess, what about product sales? The good news is that we have a winner!  Humira®, AbbVie’s monoclonal antibody Adalimumab, used to treat rheumatoid and other types of arthritis, is the highest selling product globally. IMS reported Humira’s annual sales for 2014 at $11,844 million, while AbbVie mentions their sales of Humira at $12,543 million, the difference: a mere $700 million! However, with IMS gathering data across various points of the supply chain, and the recent volatility of the currency markets, we believe that a difference of 5.5% of total sales is within range of reason. Unfortunately, things stopped making sense the moment we reached the number-two product on the IMS list. Lantus®, Sanofi’s insulin glargine, recorded sales of Euro 6,344 million (based on Sanofi’s 2014 annual report), while IMS mentions Lantus sales were $10,331 million last year. In addition, Sanofi has an 11% growth rate reported while IMS indicates a growth of 30%.   So unless the Euro/Dollar exchange rate moves back towards the 1.5 range, there seems to be a serious difference in the way the product sales are calculated by companies and by IMS.    Using information available in the annual reports and other company declarations, we attempted to compare IMS’ Top 20 Global Products 2014 with available public information, to only find more complications! Table 3/ Sales comparison of the top pharmaceutical products in 2014 (IMS vs Annual Reports) Products IMS Rank IMS Sales (US $Mn) Annual Reports Sales (US $Mn) Pharma Compass Rank Big Pharma Currency Annual Reports Sales in Mn Marketing Partner Marketing Partner Annual Report Sales (US $Mn) Humira® 1 11,844 12,543 1 Abbvie USD 12,543     Lantus® 2 10,331 7,676 5 Sanofi Euro 6,344     Sovaldi® 3 9,375 10,283 2 Gilead Sciences USD 10,283     Abilify® 4 9,285 7,556 6 Bristol Myers-Squibb USD 2,020 Otsuka 5,536 Enbrel®   5 8,707 8,538 4 Amgen USD 4,688 Pfizer 3,850 Seretide® 6 8,652 6,589 8 GSK GBP 4,229     Crestor® 7 8,473 5,512 11 AstraZeneca USD 5,512     Remicade®   8 8,097 9,880 3 Johnson & Johnson USD 6,868 Merck & Co. 2,372 Mitsubishi Tanabe 640 Nexium® 9 7,681 3,655 19 AstraZeneca USD 3,655     Mabthera®   10 6,552 6,936 7 Roche CHF 5,603 Roche 1,305 Avastin®   11 6,070 6,449 9 Roche CHF 6,417     Lyrica® 12 6,002 5,168 12 Pfizer USD 5,168     Herceptin®   13 5,564 6,306 10 Roche CHF 6,275     Spiriva® 14 5,483 3,917 17 Boehringer Euro 3,237     Januvia® 15 4,991 3,931 16 Merck & Co. USD 3,931     Copaxone® 16 4,788 4,237 14 Teva USD 4,237     Novorapid® 17 4,718 2,835 20 Novo Nordisk DKK 17,449     Neulasta® 18 4,627 4,596 13 Amgen USD 4,596     Symbicort® 19 4,535 3,801 18 AstraZeneca USD 3,801     Lucentis®   20 4,437 4,152 15 Novartis USD 2,441 Roche 1,711 Click here to access and download all the 2014 data (Excel version available) for FREE! It’s clear that the methods used to determine product sales are considerably different between IMS and the pharmaceutical companies, however there is a range of consistency as well. How accurate is each information really depends on the analyst’s point of view. Our take: With over $350 billion in total sales, we have provided our raw data for your review since we are certain that there are opportunities worth capitalizing upon and others, which may not be worthwhile to pursue. While the assessment of pharmaceutical sales is far more complicated than what we had originally imaged, the focus of Big Pharma on small molecules is on Hepatitis C drugs (Sofosbuvir,­ Olysio, AbbVie Hep C), blood thinners, Eliquis® (Apixaban), Xarelto®(Rivaroxaban) and of course ‘tinib’ cancer treatments. Table 4/ Growth of ‘tinib’ cancer treatments in 2014 (Annual Reports) Products Big Pharma Sales (US $Mn) 2013 Sales (US $Mn) 2014 Growth (%) Ibrutinib Pharmacyclics, Inc (now AbbVie) 14 492 3414% Dasatinib Bristol-Myers Squibb 1280 1493 17% Trametinib GSK 10 68 580% Nilotinib Novartis 1266 1529 21% Ruxolitinib Novartis 163 279 71% Ceritinib Novartis Not launched 31   Sunitinib Maleate Pfizer 1204 1174 -2% Crizotinib Pfizer 282 438 55% Axitinib Pfizer 319 410 29% Tofacitinib Citrate Pfizer 114 308 170% Click here to access and download all the 2014 data (Excel version available) for FREE! However, Big Pharma is now all about biologics. IMS’s data indicates that the top 10 products have only 5 biologics, while our calculations have 8 out of the top 10 products as biologics. The future strategy is best summed up by the statement in Bristol-Myers Squibb’s annual report “Just 5 years ago, we had about 40% of our development projects in biologics. If we look forward 3-5 years, we believe that number could potentially grow to about 75%”.  The barriers of entry for generic competition and potential windfalls have made rivals come together to co-market Synagis® (AbbVie & AstraZeneca), Remicade® (Johnson & Johnson, Merck and Tanabe), Xolair® and Lucentis® (Roche & Novartis). Our pharmaceutical whisper (phisper): join the bio-age or bio-degrade!  

Impressions: 12778

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/who-has-the-biggest-one-sales-of-the-top-pharma-products-by-revenue

#PharmaFlow by PHARMACOMPASS
23 Apr 2015
FDA Strikes More Than 40 Drugs Approvals In 2014
Unless you are like Voltaire and think that “The art of medicine consists of amusing patients while nature cures the disease”, you will be thrilled with the new drugs approval (NDAs) list of the FDA: about 40 new drugs in 10 therapeutic areas! It has been 18 years since the FDA approved so many new drugs, so let’s quickly take a tour at the Olympic podium:   OLYMPIC PODIUM The golden medal comes to AstraZeneca with 4 NDAs: Farxiga (diabetes), Movantik (constipation), Lynparza (ovarian cancer) and Myalept (lipodystrophy, also called fat reduction, which is common in patients with HIV and AIDS).  Then come the silver medals with 3 NDAs each: Biogen Idec with Alprolix (hemophilia B), Eloctate (hemophilia A), Plegridy (multiple sclerosis). Lilly with Cyramza (gastric cancer), Jardiance (diabetes), Trulicity (diabetes). Merck&Co with Zontivity (coronary artery disease), Belsomra (insomnia), Keytruda (melanoma). And the bronze medals with 2 NDAs each:  Boehringer-Ingelheim with Striverdi Respimat (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), Ofev (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis). Cubist with Sivextro (skin infection), Zerbaxa (urinary and abdominal infections). Gilead with Zydelig (leukemia), Harvoni (hepatitis C –“first combination pill approved to treat chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection and the first approved regimen that does not require administration with interferon or ribavirin”). Novartis with Xtoro (acute otitis externa), Zykadia (lung cancer). THERAPEUTIC AREAS  In terms of therapeutic areas, infectious diseases come first with 27% of the NDAs, followed by cancer with 18% and then rare diseases with 11% according to Forbes. Knowing that a disease is classified as ‘rare’ when it affects 200,000 people maximum in the US, the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA have done a fantastic job because overall it is 25 millions American whom are concerned by orphan diseases. And how many more around the world?  According to EvaluatePharma, in 2020 orphan drugs are expected to account for 19% of the total share of prescription drug sales excluding generics, reaching $176 billion in annual sales in America alone.   Here are the main NDAs 2014 for rare diseases: Amgen with Blincyto (Philadelphia chromosome-negative precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia- leads to cancer). Anacor with Kerydin (fungal infection). BioCryst with Rapivab (influenza- infectious disease caused by the influenza virus). Biomarin with Vimizim (Morquio A syndrome- the body is missing or doesn't have enough of a substance needed to break down long chains of sugar molecules).  Boehringer-Ingelheim with Ofev (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis).  Chelsea with Northera (neurogenetic orthostatic hypotension- often associated with Parkinson’s disease). Hoffman la Roche with Esbriet (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis). Johnson & Johnson with Sylvant (multicentric Castleman’s disease- involves hyper activation of the immune system). Paladin with Impavido (leishmaniasis- disease caused by protozoan parasites). Sanofi with Cerdelga (Gaucher’s disease- genetic disease in which fatty substance accumulate in cells and certain organs). Spectrum with Beleodaq (non-Hodgkin lymphoma- group of blood cancers that includes any kind of lymphoma except Hodgkin's lymphomas). Takeda with Entyvio (ulcerative colitis ; Crohn’s disease- inflammatory disease that affects any part of the gastrointestinal tract from mouth to anus) Valeant with Jublia (fungal infection).  Vanda with Hetlioz (non stop 24 hour sleep wake disorder).   The huge impact after the release of the 2014 NDAs list was the pharma exchange-traded funds flared up (Nasdaq Biotechnology Index and S&P 500 Health Care Index 34 percent and 23 percent respectively. However, finance is not everything, as we have all learned during the 2008 financial crisis, and NDAs are not the only conditions for a new strategy to success anymore, as proven by a lot of pharmaceutical companies in the past years who haven’t achieved enough revenues despite NDAs.  It seems that pricing is going to be key as competition is becoming fiercer. Look at the 2014 NDAs batch for anti bacterial drugs to treat skin infections; 3 brand new drugs for this year only.  Cubist with Sivextro Durata with Dalvance The Medecine Companies with Orbactiv Same for the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis as we just saw in the rare diseases approval list above: 2 NDAs for 2014. According to Fierce Pharma, there are 8 therapeutic areas where competition is going to be even fiercer in the future: hepatitis C, diabetes, cholesterol, hemophilia, hemo-oncology, psoriasis, melanoma and obesity. And it is not like patents are not going to continue dropping; generics represent now more than 40% of the products sales. Moreover, premium prices following NDAs have been implicating confrontations with insurers and governments in regards to diabetes and respiratory drugs in the past.  Therefore, new tactics have to be found!  AbbVie offered their new anti hepatitis C drug, Viekira Pak, at a discount price to Express Script (the largest pharmacy benefit management organization in the United States) for an exclusive distribution. Even if Viekira Pak is said to be a less convenient dosing regiment when compared to Gilead’s anti hepatitis C drug (Sovaldi), the deal was closed as Sovaldi’s premium price actually chocked the payers. It is a perfect move for AbbVie, who just lost their patent on one of their main drug: Humira (rheumatoid arthritis).  Biotech are said to be an excellent area for successful strategy as well.  If there is more success at R&D projects (as it looks to be the case in the biotech field) then R&D department cost less and the overall financial risk should be lowered.  Here are the main NDAs 2014 for biotech/ cancer:  Baxter with Obizur (hemophilia). Biogen Idec with Plegridy (multiple sclerosis), and Alprolix and Eloctate (hemophilia). Celgene with Otezla (psoriasis) Gilead with Zydelig (anti-cancer treatment). Helsinn with Akynzeo (emesis- prevent nausea and vomiting caused by cancer drug treatment).  Salix with Ruconest and Pfizer with Trumenba (meningitides type B). Bristol-Myers Squibb with Opdivo (melanoma) and Merck & Co with Keytruda (melanoma as well), which work by blocking a protein called Programmed Death receptor (PD-1), are the first in a coming wave of immunotherapies and are said to have the potential of generating more than 30 million USD/ year.       So in case all these new strategies don’t work and definitely become a financial matter only instead of a medical focus to help the world to live a little better, don’t forget to “always laugh when you can, it is cheap medicine” as George Gordon Byron liked to advise.    

Impressions: 2361

https://www.pharmacompass.com/radio-compass-blog/fda-strikes-more-than-40-drugs-approvals-in-2014

#Phispers by PHARMACOMPASS
05 Mar 2015
Ask Us for Pharmaceutical Supplier and Partner
Ask Us, Find A Supplier / Partner
No Commissions, No Strings Attached, Get Connected for FREE

What are you looking for?

How can we help you?

The request can't be empty

Please read our Privacy Policy carefully

You must agree to the privacy policy

The name can't be empty
The company can't be empty.
The email can't be empty Please enter a valid email.
The mobile can't be empty
Post Enquiry
POST ENQUIRY